Sixth Great Extinction

welsh

Junkmaster
So what do you think? Enough doom and gloom?

Are we up for the 6th great extinction?

The Sixth Extinction
By Niles Eldredge


There is little doubt left in the minds of professional biologists that Earth is currently faced with a mounting loss of species that threatens to rival the five great mass extinctions of the geological past. As long ago as 1993, Harvard biologist E.O. Wilson estimated that Earth is currently losing something on the order of 30,000 species per year -- which breaks down to the even more daunting statistic of some three species per hour. Some biologists have begun to feel that this biodiversity crisis -- this "Sixth Extinction" -- is even more severe, and more imminent, than Wilson had supposed.
http://www.well.com/user/davidu/sixthextinction.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3667300.stm

also-

Mass Extinction Underway, Majority of Biologists Say
Washington Post
Tuesday, April 21, 1998

[Note: scroll down this page for HUNDREDS of links to updates about the current mass extinction. Most recent update: April 14, 2005.]

By Joby Warrick
Staff Writer

A majority of the nation's biologists are convinced that a "mass extinction" of plants and animals is underway that poses a major threat to humans in the next century, yet most Americans are only dimly aware of the problem, a poll says.

The rapid disappearance of species was ranked as one of the planet's gravest environmental worries, surpassing pollution, global warming and the thinning of the ozone layer, according to the survey of 400 scientists commissioned by New York's American Museum of Natural History.

The poll's release yesterday comes on the heels of a groundbreaking study of plant diversity that concluded than at least one in eight known plant species is threatened with extinction. Although scientists are divided over the specific numbers, many believe that the rate of loss is greater now than at any time in history.

"The speed at which species are being lost is much faster than any we've seen in the past -- including those [extinctions] related to meteor collisions," said Daniel Simberloff, a University of Tennessee ecologist and prominent expert in biological diversity who participated in the museum's survey. [Note: the last mass extinction caused by a meteor collision was that of the dinosaurs, 65 million years ago.]

Most of his peers apparently agree. Nearly seven out of 10 of the biologists polled said they believed a "mass extinction" was underway, and an equal number predicted that up to one-fifth of all living species could disappear within 30 years. Nearly all attributed the losses to human activity, especially the destruction of plant and animal habitats.

Among the dissenters, some argue that there is not yet enough data to support the view that a mass extinction is occurring. Many of the estimates of species loss are extrapolations based on the global destruction of rain forests and other rich habitats.

Among non-scientists, meanwhile, the subject appears to have made relatively little impression. Sixty percent of the laymen polled professed little or no familiarity with the concept of biological diversity, and barely half ranked species loss as a "major threat."

The scientists interviewed in the Louis Harris poll were members of the Washington-based American Institute of Biological Sciences, a professional society of more than 5,000 scientists.


for more links

Now what if this extinction was inevitable- or so our leaders believed? Would they tell us?

Could countries work together to stop this?

Would it be possible to arrest our own extinction?
 
Earth is currently losing something on the order of 30,000 species per year -- which breaks down to the even more daunting statistic of some three species per hour.
These statistics always include speculated, but undiscovered species. The actual number is about 1/10,000 of what is usually stated, according to this link:.
Statistical Brick Wall

Meaning that if this article says 30,000 species go extinct every year, then the number of confirmed extinctions is closer to 3 per year, including insects.
 
As stated in the first link, the estimate is from 17,000 (not counting unknown species) to 100,000 (counting them). So it's kind of a lowered average.

Also,
This is precisely what Stuart Pimm did in describing the prospects of the Hawaiian birds. Only eleven are assured of survival well into the next century. Populations of the remaining 124 species have already been reduced, in some cases perilously so. Yet a simple species accounting notes that 135 species exist: no extinction to report.
A little more than a decade ago, ninety species of plants became extinct in a virtual instant, when the forested ridge on which they grew was cleared for agricultural land. [..] Among the riot of biodiversity that is nurtured by this habitat, Gentry and Dodson discovered, were ninety previously unknown species, including herbaceous plants, orchids, and epiphytes, that lived nowhere else. Centinela was an ecological island, which, being isolated, had developed a unique flora. Within eight years the ridge had been transformed into farmland, and its endemic species were no more. [..] Countless such ridges exist along the whole length of the Andes, most of which, too, must have developed species not found elsewhere. [..] There are two points to be emphasized here. The first is that whenever ecologists are able to survey a habitat before and after disturbance, species loss is almost always seen, often a catastrophic one. However, in the vast majority of instances, habitat destruction occurs in areas that have not been surveyed for their flora and fauna, so it is more than likely that countless species become extinct before ecologists even know of their existence.
P.S. It won't stop. As long as saving nature won't bring more money than destroying it, it won't stop. America probably will go first (since it's the most economy-driven country, and also has the highest record of extinct species), but other's won't fall far behind.
 
Yes...its not just the excessive pollution, which leads to environmental degradation and the killing of animals and plants. Its a cycle. First the larger animals go then the smaller ones. Eventually nothing keeps the plants in check and they die too. With nothing to keep the environment in balance various things worsen. Flooding increases with no plants to barricade the ground in place. Air grow more noxious without plants to use the CO2. Water over-proliferates with menacing micro-organisms that can thrive in any water. This leads to any leftover species being destroyed which ultimately...etc.

I saw we build a colony on the moon and start terraforming it. Hopefully once the environment is up and running up there we can start using it in a way already safe and within the environments means.

Sincerely,
The Vault Dweller

P.S.

...or you could hide underground 'til the primitive microorganisms create enough matter for plants to again take root and the animals to return.
 
Back
Top