Source of the crased Fed encouner ?

Blackwing said:
My personal reply would be 'is to Star Trek what FO:BOS is to Fallout'.
Correct answer.


PsychoSniper said:
Enterprise isnt that bad, just has a ton of contuinuity errors, even for StarTrek.
Wrong Answer.

And somehow "I havent watched" reminds me of "I haven't read the other threads" ...

Regarding Voyager, Voyager is incredibly weak sometimes, but also has some good points. The Doctor, for instance.
Enterprise is like Voyager without the Doctor. It's got a Vulcan that makes Tuvok appear brilliant. (Not that he was that bad, but I felt compared to the equivalent roles in previous Treks he fell short.)
And it's got a captain who makes Janeway look like a shining example of common sense. (!!!)

I could go on about why Enterprise is horrible, or you could do yourself a favour and visit www.firsttvdrama.com and read the reviews, which are all hilarious (and only slightly biased :lol:).
 
I like some of the things about Enterprise, but dislike some.

For example, why have the transporter allready ?

And at least have it seem more lowtech than the TOS transporter, take a few minutes to beam someone up and such.

But I also like how they have the trek world's great allince's shown, like with the Vulcan/Human conflictt.

Oh, and didnt the Roms devolp good ships MUCH later on ?
 
Im new to star trek fannery, so could someone make a timeline between voyager and enterprise, i think voyager is set earlier but am not sure. And whats up with that 70s decor on the Enterprises bridge???
 
Back
Top