Stupidity and the Florida votes.

[Guest]

RE: Here's a pic of the vote:

>[font size=1" color="#FF0000]LAST EDITED ON Nov-13-00
>AT 09:05 AM (GMT)
>
>http://a388.g.akamai.net/f/388/21/1.../11/09/election.president/large.ballot.ap.jpg
>
>Now...anyone who could NOT understand this
>should either be shot dead
>on general principles, or declared
>mentally incompetent.

Actually, that ballot is the most un-selfexplainable voting mechanism I've ever seen. In Norway we just have colored slips of paper, ONE - and get this - ONE slip of paper per political party. We just select a slip and done with it. And it's not harder to auto-count, well maybe a little harder but i think it's easier than your system anyway

>And for a write-in candidate, I
>would have put Alfred E.
>Neuman, because he's the one
>with most sense!
>
>"What, me worry?"

I just noticed something! Is this joke really old, seems too obvious that nobody noticed it before:

didn't the Worker's World candidate have a "sexual relationship" with one well-known Democrat some time back?

 

[Guest]

Alfred E. Neuman all the way!!!

[font size=1" color="#FF0000]LAST EDITED ON Nov-21-00 AT 06:15PM (GMT)[p]But... how would he make fun of the president? We'd lose quality MAD material by the bowl-full! That's why I would have put down Andy Kaufman as a write-in, or found a way to vote for Johnny Rotten (a.k.a John Lydon). What are they going to do if a British person wins the presidency? Kick him out?