The female side of George Bush (warning- it may shock you)

Malkavian said:
ConstinpatedCraprunner said:
No, he is the leader of the strongest nation in history. Dumbass.

I'm getting sick of asking you to watch yourself.

Okay, okay, that was out of line. Still, first time in a while, and that was fairly subdued. Guess I am used to forums where you can do that.
 
I'd say dubyah's The leader of the strongest nation in history AND a dumbass. At least somebody expertly faking a dumbass.

Welsh, those pictures are disgusting. ' Sides, I think I saw them here (was it in another forum or in another thread in GD or TO?).

I don't know why people aren't allowed to post pictures involving beautiful women's breasts and nipples, whereas transsexual fantasies starring The Missing Link are permitted.

Legalize nipples!
 
At least somebody expertly faking a dumbass.
You would be surprised how likely that is.

Not to mention his obvious dyslexia. And I do not need to state how angry I get when people confuse dyslexia with stupidity, do I?

Which raises the question of funding and special interest. What matters more, the popular will or the funding and special interest support that can channel popular support? And if there is a clash between the two (popular will vs special interest), which will prevail and why?
Simple- what the people want. It just so happens that alot of the time what the people want is influenced by money. However, not all the time....look at the resserection of Kerry.
 
Ugly John said:
Please someone explai to dubwa that it'S nucLEar not nuCUlar

It is funny though that some people say nuclear, and others say nucular. I guess it's kind of the same with the word gray/grey.

Haha, "nuclear not nucular", remembered that off family guy did you?
 
from The Simpsons

"And it's 'foilage' Marge, not 'foliage'" :)

or was Lisa correcting Homer? whatever

nucular & foilage
 
I'm surprised I didn't see this pic anywhere in this topic, until now... that is.

negative15.jpg
 
ConstinpatedCraprunner said:
No, he is the leader of the strongest nation in history. Dumbass.

Would the US attack Russia? NO

Would the US attack Pakistan? NO

Would the US attack China? NO

Would the US attack England? NO

Would the US attack France? NO

Would the US attack India? NO

Would the US attack North Korea? NO

Why the US is never going to attack these nations (of course if that nations attack the US there would be retaliations)?

Atomics Bomb. The US can have the biggest army but these nations just need to drop seven atomic bombs to exterminate everything in the US. The same applies to each nation mentioned. These nations can do anything in the world and the US cannot do anything to avoid that.


I think Bush is gifted. Very few people in the world is so funny like him. Every site I visit there is a joke about Bush. Every week a receive an e-mail with Bush doing something stupid. Homer simpsons is a nuclear genius compared with Bush. I think Bush is going to became the most famous president in history.


Yesterday I received this link:

http://www.bush-jokes.com/
 
Dude, it would take more than 7. Way more.

And don't say we would never attack those nations. Agreed, most of those nations you listed are our allies, but that could change real quick. And don't say those nations would never attack us either.
 
Paladin Solo said:
Ugly John said:
Please someone explai to dubwa that it'S nucLEar not nuCUlar

It is funny though that some people say nuclear, and others say nucular. I guess it's kind of the same with the word gray/grey.

Haha, "nuclear not nucular", remembered that off family guy did you?

NO i actually think that a guy that has the power to press that button should be able to say it correctly. HOw would you feel if your doctor talked about your hearth as "the beating thing that pumps the red stuff"?
 
Agh, I feel the same way about mechanics who say that big metal block which has all those little metal wires attached to it. That's the problem and it's going to cost you a little extra.
 
Sander said:
GW Bush is not stupid:

http://www.rotten.com/library/bio/presidents/george-w-bush/

Read it. Seriously. The guy isn't stupid. Underestimating may be what killed off his opponents.
Hmm...
That took a while to read.
I didn't know most of that.
Is it true?

Paladin Solo said:
Agh, I feel the same way about mechanics who say that big metal block which has all those little metal wires attached to it. That's the problem and it's going to cost you a little extra.
In that case, the mechanic might be trying to talk so that regular people can understand.
Pronunciation of "nuclear" is a different story.
 
EyeMaster7 said:
ConstinpatedCraprunner said:
No, he is the leader of the strongest nation in history. Dumbass.

Would the US attack Russia? NO

Would the US attack Pakistan? NO

Would the US attack China? NO

Would the US attack England? NO

Would the US attack France? NO

Would the US attack India? NO

Would the US attack North Korea? NO

Why the US is never going to attack these nations (of course if that nations attack the US there would be retaliations)?

Atomics Bomb. The US can have the biggest army but these nations just need to drop seven atomic bombs to exterminate everything in the US. The same applies to each nation mentioned. These nations can do anything in the world and the US cannot do anything to avoid that.


I think Bush is gifted. Very few people in the world is so funny like him. Every site I visit there is a joke about Bush. Every week a receive an e-mail with Bush doing something stupid. Homer simpsons is a nuclear genius compared with Bush. I think Bush is going to became the most famous president in history.


Yesterday I received this link:

http://www.bush-jokes.com/



Actually, only one of those nations has missles that can reach anywhere in the US, and they have dismateled many of those, and the other half are uselsess..

And Europe would have MUCH more to loose with a nuclear exchange, as we have many more, better missles and they have a smaller area.

Not to mention how completely ass backwards the entire EU's military is. They spend less then half of what we spend on defense, and the vast majority of them go to useless ground forces.
 
Hmm...
That took a while to read.
I didn't know most of that.
Is it true?
Yep. Well, for as far as I know, it is true.

Not to mention how completely ass backwards the entire EU's military is. They spend less then half of what we spend on defense, and the vast majority of them go to useless ground forces.
Yeah, because you can really invade and conquer country without ground forces....oh, wait....

Besides, most of the European militaries are not being used for military purposes, but for both peacekeeping and humanitarian purposes.
And Europe would have MUCH more to loose with a nuclear exchange, as we have many more, better missles and they have a smaller area.
Why.the.fuck.would.Europe.get.involved.in.a.nuclear.war?
 
Back
Top