The Vault Dweller
always looking for water.
Is it Supreme Commander (with expansion), Command and Conquer 3 (with expansion), or Warhammer 40K Dawn of War (with expansions)?
Now first let me give you some background. I've loved strategy games for years. For the longest time I played them casually. However I eventually realised "why play a game for one month single player when I can play two months by doing online play too?". I realised that while competitive play would be challenging to the point of being stressful (bad) it would also be alot more rewarding (good) so ultimately I would get more replay value out of a game.
Boy was I wrong. Communities are so large and hardcore about their respective games there is alot more to do than just play 1v1 against players of my level. I can observe games and treat the spectacle as both learning and fun watching like a bunch of friends chatting over a game on TV. I can have deep and long discussions about game theory in chat. I can download reviews of the funniest matches (hard to explain funny in game terms) and laugh my ass off.
Needless to say I didn't just get addittional replay value, but also alot more quality too.
I played Starcraft competitive for a week before I realised there are too many good players and I stand no chance. I played Warcraft 3 for over three months and had a great time due to battlenet doing a great job of matching me with players of equal skill. However I eventually reached a level I couldn't progress past and now I need a new game.
Problem is which one? It's so great to have so many more RTS out not only worth-playing, but way better than average yet now I don't know which to start on.
It depends on two things mainly: faction balance and a wide variety of play styles.
If a game isn't properly balanced then people will all play the same faction and in the same style which will bore me to death. If a game doesn't have a wide variety of play styles it won't be much of a challenge to adjust to my opponents strategy or fun thinking of my own.
Now mind you it doesn't have to be perfectly balanced (Starcraft), but I would like it to be close (Warcraft 3). It doesn't have to have 4 factions (Warcraft 3) as I would settle with 3, but I would like that the factions be very different to provide wide play styles.(Warcraft 3).
So my question to all of you friendly and knowledgable NMA'ers. Which would be best overrall; Supreme Commander, Dawn of War, or Command and Conquer 3? I realise Dawn of War has a huge amount of factions, in fact so many more that it will probably go down in history, yet are they really much different? Supreme Commander is a much more massive game with so many more unit types, but don't they seem lacking in style? Command and Conquer 3 is supposedly true to its roots in being casual and hardcore, but are those fans new ones or old ones?
I've spent the last few days spending half my online time browsing forums for such games and watching them on youtube and on each one there are always a few people whining about balance. Thing is with no knowledge of the games I have no idea whether they are just stupid noobs who can't accept defeat or seasoned pro's that are trying to get the company to patch there game.
I appreciate any and all commentary.
Sincerely,
The Vault Dweller
P.S.
I will play each game through eventually if only for single player so don't forget that the game you pick won't prevent me from playing the others. I just want to determine which is best online so I can start playing soon while alot of other players are also just starting out.
Now first let me give you some background. I've loved strategy games for years. For the longest time I played them casually. However I eventually realised "why play a game for one month single player when I can play two months by doing online play too?". I realised that while competitive play would be challenging to the point of being stressful (bad) it would also be alot more rewarding (good) so ultimately I would get more replay value out of a game.
Boy was I wrong. Communities are so large and hardcore about their respective games there is alot more to do than just play 1v1 against players of my level. I can observe games and treat the spectacle as both learning and fun watching like a bunch of friends chatting over a game on TV. I can have deep and long discussions about game theory in chat. I can download reviews of the funniest matches (hard to explain funny in game terms) and laugh my ass off.
Needless to say I didn't just get addittional replay value, but also alot more quality too.
I played Starcraft competitive for a week before I realised there are too many good players and I stand no chance. I played Warcraft 3 for over three months and had a great time due to battlenet doing a great job of matching me with players of equal skill. However I eventually reached a level I couldn't progress past and now I need a new game.
Problem is which one? It's so great to have so many more RTS out not only worth-playing, but way better than average yet now I don't know which to start on.
It depends on two things mainly: faction balance and a wide variety of play styles.
If a game isn't properly balanced then people will all play the same faction and in the same style which will bore me to death. If a game doesn't have a wide variety of play styles it won't be much of a challenge to adjust to my opponents strategy or fun thinking of my own.
Now mind you it doesn't have to be perfectly balanced (Starcraft), but I would like it to be close (Warcraft 3). It doesn't have to have 4 factions (Warcraft 3) as I would settle with 3, but I would like that the factions be very different to provide wide play styles.(Warcraft 3).
So my question to all of you friendly and knowledgable NMA'ers. Which would be best overrall; Supreme Commander, Dawn of War, or Command and Conquer 3? I realise Dawn of War has a huge amount of factions, in fact so many more that it will probably go down in history, yet are they really much different? Supreme Commander is a much more massive game with so many more unit types, but don't they seem lacking in style? Command and Conquer 3 is supposedly true to its roots in being casual and hardcore, but are those fans new ones or old ones?
I've spent the last few days spending half my online time browsing forums for such games and watching them on youtube and on each one there are always a few people whining about balance. Thing is with no knowledge of the games I have no idea whether they are just stupid noobs who can't accept defeat or seasoned pro's that are trying to get the company to patch there game.
I appreciate any and all commentary.
Sincerely,
The Vault Dweller
P.S.
I will play each game through eventually if only for single player so don't forget that the game you pick won't prevent me from playing the others. I just want to determine which is best online so I can start playing soon while alot of other players are also just starting out.