welsh
Junkmaster
Hey- remember, Fallout begins as a war over oil and other resources!
SO what's with the expensive gas?
(You elect an oil man president and then are surprised that the oil companies are making a mint? What the Fuck were you thinking?)
Or in other words, much of today's oil is controlled by state owned enterprises- essentially monopolies that get to decide what they want to sell oil for. If the SOE decides that oil is too cheap, it can control supply, which increases price as demand increases.
Put enough SOEs together over a common resource- oligopoly!
And... this is the peak oil problem?
One of the main challenges of the peak oil idea is that alternatives are likely to be found to replace petroleum. For instance- organic fuels- made from corn or sugar. But if you rely on organic fuels from things that people are supposed to eat- the price of food goes up.
Possible that this might have to do with recent discussions on global warming, with poor countries demanding a reduction of petroleum use and countries, like Saudi Arabia, asking that the poor countries about to drown pay them for NOT producing oil.
But it doesn't want to.
And then there is the speculation of commodities traders.
This shit will be with us until we find alternatives.
SO what's with the expensive gas?
(You elect an oil man president and then are surprised that the oil companies are making a mint? What the Fuck were you thinking?)
Plenty in the tank
Jun 11th 2008
From Economist.com
The problem seems to be getting to enough of the oil that is known to exist
“WE’RE not running out of hydrocarbons,” insists Tony Hayward, the boss of BP, one of the world’s biggest listed oil firms. To back up this view, he cites various comforting figures from the latest edition of the firm’s “Statistical Review of World Energy”, released on Wednesday June 11th. Enough oil has already been discovered around the world, Mr Hayward says, to maintain consumption at current levels for another 42 years. As he recently put it, humanity has guzzled through 1 trillion barrels, but has its next trillion already lined up, and could probably unearth a third trillion if it really applied itself. Why then, are oil prices hovering over $130 a barrel?
Mr Hayward blames poor policy-making or, in his florid phrase, “the madness of men”. Some 80% of the world’s oil reserves, he says, are in the hands of state-owned oil firms, which tend to allow firms like his only limited access. He believes that if these riches were fully exploited, the world could easily produce 100m barrels a day (b/d) or more. That’s a big increase on last year’s figure of 82m b/d, and a level that other oilmen, such as the boss of Total, another big Western firm, think impossible.
Or in other words, much of today's oil is controlled by state owned enterprises- essentially monopolies that get to decide what they want to sell oil for. If the SOE decides that oil is too cheap, it can control supply, which increases price as demand increases.
Put enough SOEs together over a common resource- oligopoly!
At first glance, BP’s own data seem to support the gloomier case. The firm reckons that global output fell by 130,000-odd b/d last year. Worse, proven reserves also fell, by about 1.6 billion barrels. This suggests that the world is consuming oil faster than it can be found—a worrying thought, even if reserves are large.
And... this is the peak oil problem?
One of the main challenges of the peak oil idea is that alternatives are likely to be found to replace petroleum. For instance- organic fuels- made from corn or sugar. But if you rely on organic fuels from things that people are supposed to eat- the price of food goes up.
But Christof Rühl, one of the report’s authors, points out that data on reserves are slow to appear. For several countries, BP had to make do with last year’s numbers. When the updated figures are in, he expects they will actually add up to an increase. Global reserves have risen by 36% since 1987.
As for output, Mr Rühl breaks last year’s decline into involuntary and deliberate portions. There are countries, such as Mexico and Norway, whose output is in inevitable decline. Others, such as Nigeria, saw declines brought on by political unrest. But by far the most precipitous drop last year took place in Saudi Arabia. Some argue that it too is testing the limits of geology’s bounty. But ostensibly, at any rate, the production cuts were intentional.
Possible that this might have to do with recent discussions on global warming, with poor countries demanding a reduction of petroleum use and countries, like Saudi Arabia, asking that the poor countries about to drown pay them for NOT producing oil.
Early last year OPEC was worried about rising stocks and falling prices. It resolved to trim its output, and Saudi Arabia did most of the trimming. Mr Rühl, for one, believes that it could raise its output again if it wanted.
But it doesn't want to.
In terms of consumption, too, BP reports a mixed picture. Demand for oil in rich countries fell by almost 1% last year—the biggest decline since 1983. But in poorer ones, it grew by over 4%, partly because developing economies are growing faster than those of the rich world. But subsidies for fuel consumption also play a big part. According to Mr Rühl, consumption is falling in countries with heavy taxes and rising only sluggishly where taxes are moderate. But in countries with subsidies, it is rising faster than normal, and fastest of all in the countries with the highest subsidies.
In other words, the root of the high oil price in BP’s view is not a mismatch between strong demand and feeble supply, but failure on the part of various governments to allow markets to work their magic. There are hints of an improvement on the demand side: several Asian governments have recently decided they can no longer afford subsidies. But it is hard to imagine the world’s ardent energy nationalists suddenly throwing their doors open to foreign investment.
That obliges the likes of BP to concentrate on marginal projects, either in difficult surroundings (the Arctic or deep water, for example), or with trickier forms of oil (such as tar sands). The development of such fields has been hampered of late because of a shortage of qualified engineers and suitable equipment. The traders who have been driving up the oil price believe that these bottlenecks will prevent global output from keeping pace with the developing world’s thirst for oil. For the past few years, BP’s number-crunching suggests, they have been right. But by the firm’s own admission, its statistics, although illuminating about the past, are no guide to the future.
And then there is the speculation of commodities traders.
This shit will be with us until we find alternatives.