Bradylama
So Old I'm Losing Radiation Signs
Sander said:Ofcourse, but the less resistance of the general people(Who do not agree with the occupying role of the USA even though they are happy with being freed), the less problems there will be.
I haven't heard about any protests since the start of the reconstruction effort. Are normal Iraqis really giving the US that many problems?
That's very good, noone has a right to anything. So what's the USA doing there then?
Protecting its own self-interests. Don't like it? Probably not. Mostly because it doesn't help your country's self-interest.
Seriously, though: The USA is occupying the country, and so it is, in fact, a hostile force. It isn't actually being speedy with handing over control to the Iraqi people, and it isn't the friendliest nation around right now. If they were to hand over control to either the Iraqi people or to the UN, they would be at least showing that they are willing to do anything to rebuild Iraq, and they'd be showing that they were not staying there just so they could get their hands on the resources Iraq has. Basically, by allowing the UN to come in, they show that they have good intentions, and are more a rebuilding than an occupying force, because they allow an international organisation that is not going to be interested in it's own profit.
Don't make me laugh. Do you honestly believe that UN member nations want to take control of Iraq from the Americans for purely humanitarian reasons? You've got a lot to learn about Politika.
The soldier suicide I've been hearing aobut in the news for the past two weeks....
When I ask you, "What soldier suicide?" I really want you to post a link to an article on the subject.
When countries don't abide international law, they are shunned or excluded by the rest. SO it is effective...
Right. Countries like Iraq have a LOT to lose by defying the UN. There are so many glaring exceptions to that rule it sickens me.