To the Moon and then Mars

welsh

Junkmaster
Towns on the moon? THe latest in lunar buggies? Newest fashion in space suits. The next great leap of mankind? The romance of space?

To be honest, I thought when President Zipperhead (GWB) said Mars, I thought he was just blowing smoke up our ass. But it seems they are quite serious.

What do you think?

Check it here

According to 60 minutes-
NASA is serious, very serious, about launching the most difficult mission ever attempted by the human race: putting an astronaut on Mars. The voyage will cover hundreds of millions of miles and take two-and-a-half years for the roundtrip. It sounds like science fiction.

To make it scientific fact, the United States needs to first visit familiar terrain - the moon.

It’s been nearly 40 years since Neil Armstrong took one giant leap for mankind and almost as long since the American public was truly captivated by the space program. You may not know it, but as 60 Minutes correspondent Bob Simon first reported this spring, the journey to send humans back to the moon and beyond has already begun.
 
I think this is great but we must give credit where its due. The reason for the mission to Mars even being on the table is because of Robert Zubirn chewing out John McCain and other senators back in 2003. After he made the most compelling case for space exploration and ultimately settling Mars that I could ever conceive of O' George announced to the world that we would be going to the red planet... Although I'm quite certain he used it as a diversion from Iraq so he could go on vacation for a few more days.

I (like Mr. Zubrin) do not understand the logic behind NASA's insatiable need for moon bases and in this case towns...Think of the logistics involved in sustaining a colony of any significant size on the moon. The moon as a 28 day/night cycle. How would one grow crops on the moon when all plants on earth require a 24 hour day?

Plants on earth just like humans are genetically conditioned to live in a 24 hour day/night cycle. Without severely altering that, you can not sustain crops and therefor a colony on the moon unless you want to face the overwhelming logistics of sending astronomical amounts of supplies to sustain the people there.

What of Mars you ask? Interestingly enough, Mars has for the most part, a 24 hour day. Adequate protection from solar flares and radiation (yes the existing atmosphere will protect plant life). Mars also has an atmosphere and soil that plants love to grow in. You could have an unpressurized dome and so long as you kept it warm, could grow crops.

Is the moon a good staging ground to work out the kinks before we go to Mars? You bet, I'm with that plan 100%. Does the moon have resources available to sustain a population of any kind given our current delivery methods from Earth? No way in hell. Does the moon have resources that are valuable? YES! Titanium, H3! lots of interesting things but only enough to support a small mining outpost (believe me, a miner could retire after a couple years working there!).

Given our current technology there is no feasible way to settle the moon nor is there any logic behind doing so. Mars is where its at, Mars has ALL the same elements found on earth (including water). As discussed in another topic here, Mars could be warmed up by pumping green house gasses into the atmosphere creating a "short sleeved" environment for humans. Yes, its possible the environment created will simply whisp away into space just as is happening with our planet... but does not make it not worth trying?

I find it unforgivable (as many in the space industry) that not only the USA, but the world has neglected to strive toward landing and setting up a permanent base on Mars much earlier.

We could go to Mars in the next 10 years, it is possible, it does not cost 400billion dollars as NASA at one time would have us beleive.... We can go to Mars and back... for under 100 million dollars. Mr. Zubrin exclaimed when addressing congress in 2003, "Why is NASA stuck in low earth orbit!?"

Needless to say, he never received an answer... McCain asked why he was angry instead. Good listener that one. :lol:

We need to go to Mars, and we need to do it today.
 
Maphusio said:
How would one grow crops on the moon when all plants on earth require a 24 hour day?.
Hehe so wrong. Where I come from we have this little thing called the polar circle. During the early summer we have 28 days of sun in parts of the country and guess what...our crops grow just fine with the sun shining at them 24/7. And seriously even if that was not the case, how hard would it be to cover over the plants, like you know...pulling the shutters close?

Personally I do not care to much about the travel to the moon or the mars, but last time man went to the moon there was done alot of research into science and technology to get those men to the moon, things that have helped us alot since. Imagine the stuff that the engineers at nasa will invent when they need to send people to Mars and how helpfull that will be. Not to mention what they will have to invent to start bases on the moon.
 
Loxley said:
Maphusio said:
How would one grow crops on the moon when all plants on earth require a 24 hour day?.
Hehe so wrong. Where I come from we have this little thing called the polar circle. During the early summer we have 28 days of sun in parts of the country and guess what...our crops grow just fine with the sun shining at them 24/7. And seriously even if that was not the case, how hard would it be to cover over the plants, like you know...pulling the shutters close?

Personally I do not care to much about the travel to the moon or the mars, but last time man went to the moon there was done alot of research into science and technology to get those men to the moon, things that have helped us alot since. Imagine the stuff that the engineers at nasa will invent when they need to send people to Mars and how helpfull that will be. Not to mention what they will have to invent to start bases on the moon.


You've missed my point. Crops do not grow when there is no sun light. The amount of energy required to provide a substantial crop enough to survive equates to every power plant in the world pumping at max... That's just how much energy the sun gives us and that is how much energy a good sized crop will require in order to survive on the moon. See my point now? Why try to survive on the moon when you are talking more money than anyone could possibly afford.

On Mars, you don't have the month of no light, and a month of light cycle. Plants have soil and the appropriate atmosphere to breath. Creating these "moon towns" is just not practical absent of a good delivery system. If we could get to LEO without having to worry about that pesky thing gravity, then the logistics of supplying moon towns or even cities is not as extreme. Until that day, we need to strive for Mars not the moon, yet, folk keep headed for Luna's grasp.
 
Every single President promised to return to the Moon and go off to Mars. It's not gonna happen unless the Chinese flag appears on the Moon, and that won't be for a while.
 
I think at this point in time, our monies could be better spent on earth. We've got more serious problems such as our energy dependency on petroleum then picking up some more pretty rocks on the moon, then mars.

I would be all for this a few years ago, but when I'm having to spend 5-600/month on gas. it seems a bit excessive.
 
People grow weed in their basements (I've seen it on the internets!). They just need to open up those gates to hell and let some demons run the hamster wheels. UV lamps for teh win!
 
Well, I agree that our money could be spent elsewhere, however, the point was also made about the advancement of technology in several fields of study as a by-product of the research needed for the mission. You say that you want money to go into alternative energies, well that would be just one of these byproducts. Perhaps if we really want to achieve the goal of a sustainable energy source that everyone can agree upon, we need to inspire people through something amazing such as this mission to mars. This would be an absolutely huge step in human kind and I believe that is exactly what we as a species need. Just a thought though.
 
Once, long ago, I would have been totally enthusiastic about these dangerous, romantic space missions, the whole "to boldly go where no man has ever gone before" crap I grew up with, but now that I am older and a little wiser, I feel like asking the retards who thought this up one simple question: "What's the friggin' point?" Not only would it be unethical to burn all those tons of fossil fuel on said missions, energy that might be spent more wisely, but it's also completely unrealistic. Towns on the moon? Men on Mars? Are these people still living in the goddamn fifties or something? We're sitting on a planet that is in dire need of help (in oh so many ways) and these NASA goons actually have the nerve to say stuff like:

"I think Mars will figure prominently in the future of the human race. Well, I think Mars is in, in the distant future, is another home for human beings."

Another home? I don't know about you, but I sure as hell do not want to live on a fucking ball of dust where, on an avarage day, it doesn't get much warmer than minus 60° Celsius simply because all the geniuses we presumably have couldn't figure out a way to save Earth.

"The average American’s bill, if you will, for the space program, is 15 cents per person, per day," says Griffin. "I don’t know about you, but I spend more than that on bubble gum."
He even chews fossil fuel residu! This Griffin should be double hanged, skinned alive and thrown into a jacuzzi full of starving pirahnas.

I've really started hating scientists when I discovered that all the fluoride in my toothpaste is simply there to keep me calm and manageable (heavy water fluoridation was used in Siberian workcamps to keep the prisoners calm and meek) and doesn't really do anything for my teeth.
 
I don't think mankind wants to rely on fossile fuel and chemical rockets to roam around space ...

Like KillerJoe123 stated - a mission to Mars could bring about the transition to better utilized energy sources much faster than our oil companies' hunt for profit.
 
Ok, so we spend money now for a mission to mars, which isn't going to happen for how many years? Then, we gain knowledge into alternative energy sources. How many years after that can we expect a viable return?

Why not put that money to use NOW? How is actually going to Mars going to produce results that we can't obtain by staying on the the ole Earth and applying the same research to the problems we have here?
 
While I agree with you in principle, Pope, I just don't see us (yes, the entire world) being able to do it.

Simply put; competition.

It is too easy for world leaders to adhere to the principle of the tragedy of the commons. "Why should we reduce our pollution if country xx does not do the same?"

When it comes to being able to say "Hey; we beat you guys to Mars. Mars, man!" I think both funding and focus will be much easier to come by.
 
Daimyo said:
I don't think mankind wants to rely on fossile fuel and chemical rockets to roam around space ...
We may not want to rely on them for space travel, but we have to. It's all we've got to escape Earth's gravity. Unless you want to start building that space elevator made out of carbon nanotubes (or whatever it is) I've been hearing about. And that's not taking into account the fact that we would (again) need tons and tons of fossil fuel to build that contraption and make, have it work.

Apparently, I can not repeat this enough: there are no exotic energy sources out there that we have not yet discovered. I know some of you are overly optimistic because you were born that way, but trust me: it's not going to happen. Ever. All the mad plans of fuelling space ships with light or sunwind or hydrogyn and so on, they're all good and well, but they will not get us to escape Earth's gravity and that's the first thing you need to do to get into space.

Daimyo said:
Like KillerJoe123 stated - a mission to Mars could bring about the transition to better utilized energy sources much faster than our oil companies' hunt for profit.
Huh? In what way would a manned mission to Mars teach us more about alternative energy sources? These missions will be so small in scale, they'll be able to feed all their electronic instruments with solar energy and brainfarts - things we can experiment with on Earth as well AND on a much grander scale.

Our species don't need a manned mission to Mars (and a succesful one at that) to be inspired. And such a mission would not be an absolutely huge step for humankind in any way. It would be a stupid step to take in times like these. The only thing humankind needs to be inspired in their search for sustainable energy sources is a huge kick in the butt. And I'm pretty sure that nature will eventually hand us such a humongous buttkick.
 
alec said:
All the mad plans of fuelling space ships with light or sunwind or hydrogyn

Can we power them with misogyn? Smack some bitches and we're awaaaaaaaayyyyy
 
alec said:
Our species don't need a manned mission to Mars (and a succesful one at that) to be inspired. And such a mission would not be an absolutely huge step for humankind in any way. It would be a stupid step to take in times like these. The only thing humankind needs to be inspired in their search for sustainable energy sources is a huge kick in the butt. And I'm pretty sure that nature will eventually hand us such a humongous buttkick.

I'm sorry your heart is not in it as it once was.

Since you seem to be convinced on proving that spending resources on space flight and manned missions to Mars is a misuse I'll put things into perspective for you... If we as a species are to have any hope of survival we must become a space faring species. We must get off this planet, we must spread our seed through this solar system and beyond in order to ensure our survival. As Spock would say, "Logic dictates this."


You stated that there are no "exotic" particles or alternative means of travel and seemed to imply that as a known fact. That, we as humans have evolved to the point where we completely understand the universe and know there is no way to traverse the expanse of space other than with current conventional means. Surly this was a comment made in angst as it is clearly flawed. We know very little about the universe, a true working TOE has not been developed. The closer we come to figuring things out we come up with more questions and new innovative ideas. Look at the development of string and m-theory in the past 20 years. In that time alone we have discovered so much that has turned what we thought we knew before upside down. Now amazing concepts such as traveling through space via a gravity or "SlipString" drive has come to pass. There are limitless ways to traverse space and beleive me, we have just begun our trek at exploring those ways and satisfying our never ending curiosity.


You had also indicated a manned mission to Mars would not accomplish anything of value and that we would not want to live on the surface of that planet due to its inhospitable climate. As I stated in the post above your initial post in this thread, that is something we can correct. Terraforming Mars is a very real possibility and to assume it will not work, and therefore is not worth trying is mind boggling. We are talking the equivalent of cave man discovers fire and puts it out because it might not always start in the future.


Common sense suggests that our days are numbered on this planet. Its only a matter of time before a catastrophe destroys life as we know it, as has happened many times in Earths past. The longer we stay here and continue to over populate this planet, rob it of its balance, ignore external threats and expect it to keep on giving brings us one step closer to finding out when our lease on this world ends.

I'm not the doomsday fanatic you might find preaching on a bustling street corner. I'm not a 30 year old male in his parents basement waiting to join starfleet academy. I'm someone whom believes in the survival of the human race. I'm someone whom recognizes the need to have a back-up plan, and to not have all of the proverbial eggs in one basket. :wink:
 
Maphusio said:
I'm sorry your heart is not in it as it once was.
That's what getting older usually does to a man.

If we as a species are to have any hope of survival we must become a space faring species. We must get off this planet, we must spread our seed through this solar system and beyond in order to ensure our survival. As Spock would say, "Logic dictates this."
Oh, but I agree: that is what logic dictates. Unfortunately it's never going to happen unless it is staged and filmed in a Hollywood studio. Where it has happened countless times before.

You stated that there are no "exotic" particles or alternative means of travel and seemed to imply that as a known fact.
No, I did not state that. I said there are no exotic sources of energy out there that we don't already know of. We're not going to dig up some weird, magical mineral all of a sudden of which we only need a gram to fuel everything on Earth for the coming thousand years or so. That's not going to happen. Trust me.

That, we as humans have evolved to the point where we completely understand the universe and know there is no way to traverse the expanse of space other than with current conventional means.
Again: I did not state that. At all. Of course we do not understand the universe completely. We never will. We do have a pretty good understanding and knowledge of what Earth has to offer, how our small planet works, where it is located, and so on. We don't know everything about Earth yet, but I reckon it's safe to say that this is the only planet we understand so well.
Compare it to the Electromagnetic Spectrum: we know that spectrum from top to bottom. There are no surprises left there for us, even if we can't see or feel or hear certain wavelengths. Compare it to the Periodic Table: we know that table, we even designed an extended version of it, including numerous possible, but yet to be discovered elements and there's no totally awesome element left that can save our arses, otherwise we'd be looking for it or making it ourselves.
The same thing holds true for energy sources. We know them. We know all the stuff we can use to fuel things with. We can't use all of them because they're often not even to be found on Earth (stuff that happens in stars or black holes), but we do know them. So no: we're not all of a sudden gonna discover a new alternative source of energy. Those days ended long ago. We have to make do with what we have.

Surly this was a comment made in angst as it is clearly flawed.
No.

We know very little about the universe, a true working TOE has not been developed. The closer we come to figuring things out we come up with more questions and new innovative ideas.
We'll never construct such a TOE. Ever. It's not because we're supposed to be the most intelligent species on Earth that we can grasp everything. Just like a cat doesn't know that it is a cat. Just like lice think the world starts and ends with the fur of certain animals. And so on. We are limited as well, and it is my opinion that we are too stupid to figure out completely how the fabric of reality works. I don't care about that, though. The only thing I hate about this is that 99% of humankind chooses to discard what little we do know about the universe (scientific facts) in favour of bedtime stories and blatant lies (religion and philosophy).

Look at the development of string and m-theory in the past 20 years. In that time alone we have discovered so much that has turned what we thought we knew before upside down. Now amazing concepts such as traveling through space via a gravity or "SlipString" drive has come to pass. There are limitless ways to traverse space and beleive me, we have just begun our trek at exploring those ways and satisfying our never ending curiosity.
In short? Science Fiction. In the past we've speculated about travelling through wormholes as well, but as far as I know, we have yet to do so, right?
All the crap that scientists come up with nowadays serves one main purpose: fund raising, blingbling making. If NASA claims that there is certain evidence for life on Mars, you can bet your arse that they need cash badly. And they usually need it for something completely unrelated to what they've just made public.
It's a trick as old as the world. It's why Columbus got to "discover" America, for instance (new traderoutes -> let's rob them of their gold and dignity). And it's sad that so many people tend to believe this crap.

You had also indicated a manned mission to Mars would not accomplish anything of value and that we would not want to live on the surface of that planet due to its inhospitable climate. As I stated in the post above your initial post in this thread, that is something we can correct. Terraforming Mars is a very real possibility and to assume it will not work, and therefore is not worth trying is mind boggling. We are talking the equivalent of cave man discovers fire and puts it out because it might not always start in the future.
Terraforming Mars? Science Fiction. And yes: it's mind boggling that one would dare to believe stuff like that. Discovery Channel is probably one of the worst inventions ever. It feeds lies to kids and grown-ups alike.
That you dare to compare Terraforming and Galactic Conquest to the discovery of fire is - to say the least - pretty damn laughable. Fire was handed to mankind on pretty much a silver plate by nature.

Common sense suggests that our days are numbered on this planet. Its only a matter of time before a catastrophe destroys life as we know it, as has happened many times in Earths past.
I agree wholeheartedly.

The longer we stay here and continue to over populate this planet, rob it of its balance, ignore external threats and expect it to keep on giving brings us one step closer to finding out when our lease on this world ends.
Overpopulation can be dealt with without having to travel the rest of the universe. All it takes is five minutes of political courage. Pollution can be dealt with without having to leave Earth. Again: five minutes of political courage and the first step would be taken.
The reason why this ain't happening is probably because a large part of humankind thinks exactly the way you do: pfff, if this place gets fucked up, let's just move to another planet and fuck that one up as well. Reasoning like that would make sense if we were located in a part of the universe with lots of habitable planets and an abundancy of resources, but that is not the case. Our solar system is such an empty, lonesome place that common sense should tell you only one thing: we're stuck here and if we don't try to save our arses here, it's not going to happen anywhere else.

Another reason why it ain't happening? Courage and politics don't go well together nowadays. Popularity is all that counts. Losing votes because of harsh decisions is not an option for modern day politicians. But you already knew that, right? That real change ain't gonna happen? :roll:

I'm not the doomsday fanatic you might find preaching on a bustling street corner. I'm not a 30 year old male in his parents basement waiting to join starfleet academy. I'm someone whom believes in the survival of the human race. I'm someone whom recognizes the need to have a back-up plan, and to not have all of the proverbial eggs in one basket. :wink:
There is no back-up plan. Plan A is all we've got and unfortunately we are noticing that our Plan A is becoming quite the failure.
How many centuries do you think we have left to figure out how to SlipString our sorry arses through space before the ice melts, the water raises and the floods swoop us away?

:roll:

Maybe we should learn how to grow gills first before we try to conquer the rest of the universe. What do you think? Wouldn't that be feasible according to Discovery Channel?
 
I'll keep my 2 cents short and sweet.

Baring a major biological or nuclear conflict, this planet is going to remain habitable for thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, if not millions of years. Even then, a major war would have little effect to the overall picture.

Space travel is something that we should do, but we are not ready yet, and we are certainly in no rush, aiming to get to mars within 10-20 years is uncessary and holds little if any benifit.
 
Back
Top