Fallout 4 images leak

Kilus

Not Australian
Orderite
Images from the Spanish version of Fallout 4 have leaked:

Image album Nuked

New set of leaks in English with a female protagonist:

Image album Nuked

Picture of Dogmeat:

<iframe src="http://gfycat.com/ifr/OrneryObviousBirdofparadise" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="1280" height="720" style="-webkit-backface-visibility: hidden;-webkit-transform: scale(1);" ></iframe>

Of note is the date on Pipboy being October 23th 2287 which means the game takes place 210 years to the day after the bombs fell. It also takes place 126 Years after Fallout, 46 years after Fallout 2, 10 Years after Fallout 3 and 6 years after Fallout New Vegas.
 
Last edited:
So it looks like the Lyons Brotherhood of Steel will be the Brotherhood we see in Fallout 4 then. 10 years is more then enough time to build a bigger army and expand.
 
Now the airship named Prydwen makes complete sense. Arthur Maxson, now at the age of 20, is one of the leaders or the leader of the chapter. I'm not a fan of Lyons' group based off what we saw in 3, but I hope the midwest chapter is also involved.
 
It looks just as expected on the consoles.

No groundbreaking visuals, just average solid graphics. No surprise here.

We all know Fallout never looks groundbreaking, it's an enormous open world where you can do anything... not Uncharted or Crysis.
 
It looks just as expected on the consoles.

No groundbreaking visuals, just average solid graphics. No surprise here.

We all know Fallout never looks groundbreaking, it's an enormous open world where you can do anything... not Uncharted or Crysis.

Witcher 3 was one of the biggest open world games ever made and the graphics of that game are very well made. There is no excuse for Fallout 4 especially given their supposed 5 year development time.
 
It looks just as expected on the consoles.

No groundbreaking visuals, just average solid graphics. No surprise here.

We all know Fallout never looks groundbreaking, it's an enormous open world where you can do anything... not Uncharted or Crysis.

Witcher 3 was one of the biggest open world games ever made and the graphics of that game are very well made. There is no excuse for Fallout 4 especially given their supposed 5 year development time.

Supposed? I don't think they have been doing anything else at least the last 4 years.

I played over 100 hours of Witcher 3 on PS4, loved it, but it doesn't look that different graphic wise and has lots of framedrops while Fallout 4 (according to the Spanish guy posting the pics) runs smoothly.
 
You seriously need to get your eyes checked if you seriously think this looks like Witcher 3....

On console.. yes.. don't see much difference. There's just this limitation with these gen consoles..

On PC witcher 3 is far superiour of course.
 
It looks just as expected on the consoles.

No groundbreaking visuals, just average solid graphics. No surprise here.

We all know Fallout never looks groundbreaking, it's an enormous open world where you can do anything... not Uncharted or Crysis.

Witcher 3 was one of the biggest open world games ever made and the graphics of that game are very well made. There is no excuse for Fallout 4 especially given their supposed 5 year development time.

Supposed? I don't think they have been doing anything else at least the last 4 years.

I played over 100 hours of Witcher 3 on PS4, loved it, but it doesn't look that different graphic wise and has lots of framedrops while Fallout 4 (according to the Spanish guy posting the pics) runs smoothly.

It doesn't look any different? Okay now I think your just trolling. Also of course "critics" will say the game runs smoothly. I remember before Skyrim was released when "critics" said that it didn't have any bugs! :lol:
 
It looks just as expected on the consoles.

No groundbreaking visuals, just average solid graphics. No surprise here.

We all know Fallout never looks groundbreaking, it's an enormous open world where you can do anything... not Uncharted or Crysis.

Witcher 3 was one of the biggest open world games ever made and the graphics of that game are very well made. There is no excuse for Fallout 4 especially given their supposed 5 year development time.

Supposed? I don't think they have been doing anything else at least the last 4 years.

I played over 100 hours of Witcher 3 on PS4, loved it, but it doesn't look that different graphic wise and has lots of framedrops while Fallout 4 (according to the Spanish guy posting the pics) runs smoothly.



It doesn't look any different? Okay now I think your just trolling. Also of course "critics" will say the game runs smoothly. I remember before Skyrim was released when "critics" said that it didn't have any bugs! :lol:

The Spanish guy posting these pics is hating on them. Go look at his posts.

He says it looks like shit. But he says it runs really smooth.
 
You seriously need to get your eyes checked if you seriously think this looks like Witcher 3....

On console.. yes.. don't see much difference. There's just this limitation with these gen consoles..

On PC witcher 3 is far superiour of course.

And there's the difference: Without mods, Fallout 4 will look basically the same on PC. Because ports are hard.
 
You seriously need to get your eyes checked if you seriously think this looks like Witcher 3....

On console.. yes.. don't see much difference. There's just this limitation with these gen consoles..

On PC witcher 3 is far superiour of course.

And there's the difference: Without mods, Fallout 4 will look basically the same on PC. Because ports are hard.

I play on console (i am a poor student) so I get to play the crappiest looking version anyway.

I Just don't understand why people think this looks worse than other games on PS4.
 
as a newbie i cant post the links but go to allgamesbeta dot com and you will see there a couple of more screenshots
 
Back
Top