15 Coolest Games of the Fall

Brother None

This ghoul has seen it all
Orderite
PC World has an article on the 15 coolest games of this Fall, and naturalement Fallout 3 is in it.<blockquote>Matt: This one has been steeped in controversy ever since a wildly vocal minority elected to brand it as "unfaithful" to the originals. Don't buy what they're selling. First, those originals got better press than they deserved because RPGs in the late 1990s were rarer than jackalopes. (Beware crabby fanboys swathed in blinkered nostalgia!) Second, Bethesda has already done a pretty bang-up job capturing the spirit of the originals in promotional clips, so this skeptic's cap is tipped, and his fingers are triple-crossed.

Darren: I've actually had the chance to play through about a half-hour of the game, and what a huge mistake that was -- I wanted more. Lots more! The thing that's most frightening about Bethesda: Those people make huge, massively single-player offline games that'll chew up well over 100 hours of your life. But you won't miss the lost time as you traipse around a nuke-blasted Washington, D.C. From what I've seen so far, the inky-black humor from the original games remains intact. One thing that the haters jump on is the notion that it isn't a turn-based strategy game. Wrong! Hold down a button in combat, and it stops the clock, allowing you to call your next targeted shot. If you want, you can play the whole game that way.</blockquote>Many of us will remember Matt Peckham for either his false, baseless accusations towards NMA or his NWN 2 review that was so spectacularly bad and misinformed 1up pulled it not long after it was published. Chalk one more up for Matt, this may be the first time someone has gone so low in the hype department as to actually hate on the original Fallouts to praise Fallout 3.

Matt Peckham. A legend in his own time.

Thanks TheGM.
 
*Does GM pose of Victory*

When I read it, I knew they where going to hype it up but I didn't know he say something that stupid.

The dude bashed Fallout 1+2....wow. how the hells does that work?
 
Meh, maybe he's still got his panties in a twist over the NMA seditious libel he wrote and feels the need to lash out at us to make himself feel like a big-man. Don't go to the beach while Peckham is there, he will steal your girl and destroy your sandcastle.
 
Heh.

Funny thing is I never really heard of Peckham before the first time we bashed heads over the rather dubious article he wrote about our review, but since then I have seen nothing but negative opinions on him.

Does he have a personal grudge towards us? If this were a professional journalist we were talking about I'd say no: no real professional would let his feelings interfere with his work like that.

But guys like this, or GameSpy's Delsyn, they're bad. And their editors should know better, and not let them anywhere near a subject they're so heavily involved in on a personal level.
 
Aftewr further thought It looks like Flame Bait.

And now that I read he has vendetta.

What a dink.
 
That NW2 review was pretty fucking botched. I've never played it, but I have a feeling the game doesn't deserve a 5. This guy needs to get off his ego. I mean damn.
 
Gentlemen said:
That NW2 review was pretty fucking botched. I've never played it, but I have a feeling the game doesn't deserve a 5. This guy needs to get off his ego. I mean damn.

The irony is that there were a lot of 'old school RPGers' who deemed him a martyr for giving a fair review of a game they didn't like.

Now he is a douche.

Well either way he is a douche.

And how do I get that job?

HEY GUYS, I LOOKED ON THE AMAZON UPCOMING RELEASES AND HERE THEY ARE! /article submitted /paycheck cashed.
 
Matt Peckham said:
First, those originals got better press than they deserved because RPGs in the late 1990s were rarer than jackalopes

Say what? Even if one was to accept this premise about RPGs being more plentiful nowadays (which just might be true, considering how anything can and will be labeled as one only God knows why), the fact is that both Fallouts managed to stand out among some of the best games ever for the genre, a list that would probably include a lot more entries from that decade than from this dark age of mediocrity and stagnancy we live today.

Now along comes this bozo to say that they were overrated like it makes a difference as to wether Failout 3 is faithful or not to them. Yeah, poor underdog Bethesda is surely powerless against the originals' overwhelming hype and marketing.
 
Stoveburner said:
The irony is that there were a lot of 'old school RPGers' who deemed him a martyr for giving a fair review of a game they didn't like.

There are plenty of reasons not to like NWN2, it's far from a perfect game.

But Peckham's review didn't really contain any valid reasons to disliked NWN 2, just an expression of dislike of the core principles of RPGs. Why this guy plays let alone reviews RPGs is beyond me, he just doesn't like them.
 
Brother None said:
Stoveburner said:
The irony is that there were a lot of 'old school RPGers' who deemed him a martyr for giving a fair review of a game they didn't like.

There are plenty of reasons not to like NWN2, it's far from a perfect game.

But Peckham's review didn't really contain any valid reasons to disliked NWN 2, just an expression of dislike of the core principles of RPGs. Why this guy plays let alone reviews RPGs is beyond me, he just doesn't like them.

I completely agree that his reasons for disliking the game were suspect and mostly outright bad. Personally I liked the game.

But there were in fact many people who just looked at the score and didn't care about the meat of the review. That happens a lot, on both sides.. for many games.

Human nature though. We like to read what we want into things that make them fit our own bias.

I also agree he should not be reviewing RPGs. Someone who hates the core of DnD cannot be objective about.. a DnD game.
 
Valkyria Chronicles looks cool as hell (page 13 of review), turn based rpg, PS3 only though :(. Looks like a cross between Fallout Tactics/Final fantasy tactics and JRPGs like Eternal Sonata, with special moves like FO3 VATS.

Hope it gets bad reviews because i just can't play it :(
 
Humpsalot said:
Valkyria Chronicles looks cool as hell (page 13 of review), turn based rpg, PS3 only though :(. Looks like a cross between Fallout Tactics/Final fantasy tactics and JRPGs like Eternal Sonata, with special moves like FO3 VATS.

Hope it gets bad reviews because i just can't play it :(

I've never heard of the game but it sounds like a sequel to Valkyrie Profile for the PS1 (although I think it may have already had a sequel on the PS2).

Not much to say about the article, it kind of speaks for itself. Writers like this are a big part of the problem with game "journalism" and I think the industry would be in a lot better shape once writers actual show some journalistic integrity.
 
Here is there list in case any of you don't feel like clicking through 15 pages. Fallout 3 has quite the competition this fall, at least on the consoles. It's in order of release date.

Saints Row 2 (Oct. 14)
Dead Space (Oct. 14)
Far Cry 2 (Oct. 21)
Fable 2 (Oct. 21)
LittleBigPlanet (Oct. 21)
Guitar Hero World Tour (Oct. 26)
Command & Conquer: Red Alert 3 (Oct. 27)
Fallout 3 (Oct. 28)
Tom Clancy's Endwar (Nov. 4)
Resistance 2 (Nov. 4)
Gears of War 2 (Nov. 7)
Valkyria Chronicles (Nov. 11)
Mirror's Edge (Nov. 11)
World of Warcraft: Wrath of the Lich King (Nov. 13)
Left 4 Dead (Nov. 17)
 
Brother None said:
because RPGs in the late 1990s were rarer than jackalopes.

And today there are more RPGs or what? And I mean RPGs and not "RPGs".

Bethesda has already done a pretty bang-up job capturing the spirit of the originals in promotional clips,

Bethesda has not.


It is interesting how much negative he is about some RPGs and how less negative about some other.
 
Lexx said:
It is interesting how much negative he is about some RPGs and how less negative about some other.

It's a wonder what a few bottlecaps can do to some people's opinions.
Why people would pay this guy is a mystery, though. Or have him on a payroll.
 
Don't buy what they're selling. First, those originals got better press than they deserved because RPGs in the late 1990s were rarer than jackalopes. (Beware crabby fanboys swathed in blinkered nostalgia!)

:clap: Kind of ironic that the author of this statement, is giving better press to F3 than it deservres.
 
So is this knob gobbler accusing Brother None and SuAside of recording the demo preview at the Game Conference in Leipzig with no sort of evidence what so ever?
 
Back
Top