Alternative Perspective

Lumpy said:
RPGenius said:
Yep, some people have difficulty with the concept that if you're aiming for something in paticular, but don't hit it, you miss it.
:roll: You miss it, so how about you hit something else?
Sander, the eyes are just above the center of the face. Sure, there should be a lower chance - like 65 vs. 90, but not worse.

Pretty much what I'm saying, but you are still missing the eyes.
 
if you aim at somones eyes and you aren't blind have nubs for hands,even if you miss your still gonna F some dude's face up.that will do some serious damage no matter what part of the head you hit.think of it like them turning to the side and just barely grazing the top of their eye socket.atleast those are my views on the eye hits.critical hits are pretty self explanatory.
 
I think Sander explain it properly.

I'll support him with an example.

An US Army private sorints across the street into a house. A Wehrmacht soldat sees him and shoots him with his MP40. Being not too accurate at longer distances, most of the burst misses, but one scrapes his head.

"Pvt. John McNamara was hit in the head for 8 hit points."

He carries a sniper rifle and returns fire, aiming for the hed of the enemy. Fires. The Springfield is accurate, and the bullet hits cleanly.

"Sch. Paul Krieger was critically hit in the head for 128 points. The attack crushes the temple. Good night, Gracie."

C'est tout.
 
*blinks*
It was an example, corey. An example. Something made up.
Also, could you stop spamming? You've been posting mostly useless junk like that post above here, so stop it.
 
Back
Top