Despite Bethesda's Flaws...

Do you agree?

  • yeah

    Votes: 10 24.4%
  • nah

    Votes: 31 75.6%

  • Total voters
    41
Why? Obsideian makes better written, better designed, and more fun rpgs than Beth. What would obsidian gain from being bought by a company that is incapable of doing any of that?

Money and stability.

In the article the CEO said that he always felt the gun to his head when it came to budget. He also stated that the heads had to take pay breaks to pay the other employees. Fallout has already proved interesting to millions of people in its "retarded" form. No they just need good writing and better RP.
 
I give full credits to the concept art artists, any day. I'm always baffled by the quality of some concept arts, hell, even for mediocre games.
But the thing is, Fallout 3 doesn't do them a good justice. Hell, even Unreal Tournament had more visual fidelity to its concept arts, the maps are big, beautiful, unique and they really look like what you had in mind, watching the work of the artists. Same for Dishonored, which is admirable in terms of level design, and fidelity with its concept arts. You can really see that there was a synergy in the dev team, between the concept artists and the actual level designers.

As much as Fallout 3 tried, I see it far behind these titles, unfortunately. Blame the game's engine for that, because Unreal Tournament came out in 2004 and even by today's standards, has pretty good looking sets. Fallout 3 came out, what, four, five years later ?
Or blame the lack of coordination and synergy within Bethesda's team. Maybe the concept arts never actually met the level designers, which would be a shame. It's like if a movie's writer never gets to be on set, talking to the director. That can only result in poor concept fidelity, for obvious reasons.
 
>I think Fallout 3 and 4 are great

Fallout 4 is atrocious. It's a dumbed down, even more casual version of FO3 with diablo-like legendary weapons, mutating enemies (which have no in-lore sense whatsoever) where your main focus of fun is building settlements. (which were meant to be optional part of the game)
It's like they made it with a principle "mods will fix it".

So I voted for nah, just because you've included it.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top