MrBumble said:Age of Decadence ? Afterfall ?
Eschalon: Book II? Geneforge 5? Frayed Knights? Scars of War? Cyclopean? ITS Unnamed Project?
Man the indie RPG genre is thriving. If AoD is the success we all hope it is, it should rocket up.
MrBumble said:Age of Decadence ? Afterfall ?
As I said, it looks worse than the game that I played that I only enjoyed because it was multiplayer so even when I was frequently playing four player games it wasn't appealing enough to warrant more than a look and some question of whether a game worse than what we were playing would be fun purely because it was different.Jiggly McNerdington said:The Dark Alliance games are probably a better bet. Unless you absolutely positively have to see F:BOS, which is understandable.
Why not?Arash said:cmon guys, Fallout 3 cant be as bad as Fallout POS.
I think that Dragon Age: Origins looks promising as well and it's not an indie. That said, it's also to early to make any call on it and it seems to have a fairly linear story ala Bioware's norm (though I'm futilely hoping they make it variable) so it's likely to offer less freedom (hence less roleplaying) than the indie titles.Brother None said:MrBumble said:Age of Decadence ? Afterfall ?
Eschalon: Book II? Geneforge 5? Frayed Knights? Scars of War? Cyclopean? ITS Unnamed Project?
Man the indie RPG genre is thriving. If AoD is the success we all hope it is, it should rocket up.
cmon guys, Fallout 3 cant be as bad as Fallout POS.
Jiggly McNerdington said:You played Hinterland by any chance, Brother None?
Arash said:Fo 2 > Fo 1 > Fo:Tactics > Fallout 3 > Fo:BoS
fixed.
cmon guys, Fallout 3 cant be as bad as Fallout POS.