zioburosky13
Vault Senior Citizen
We know Fallout is inspired by Mad Max and last night, I just watched the re-run of Mad Max: The Road warrior and Mad Max: Beyond thunderdome. Watching both movie has given me an ironic feeling of how Fallout and Mad max had the same fate.
Here's my thought:
Both franchise got their massive attention from the 2nd sequel. In this case, Fallout 2 and Mad Max: The Road Warrior (or FO2 and MM:TRW)
Conclusion: Their sequels are sucky/will suck/will not appeal to even the most casual player.
MM:TRW has engaging car chase scene which in turns like the combat of Fallout. But in MM:Beyond Thunderdome, the car chase scene has been reduced. For me:
Car chase scene in MM:BTD = Fallout 3's V.A.T system.
Conclusion: One of the major element of both franchise suck so bad in their sequel.
MW:TRW has better character development. Lord Humungous is a better villian than Aunt Entity. The master is better than president.
(Especially Lord Humungous, I feel sad when the scene of he took out his Smith and Wesson Model 29 and have a small glimpse of a family picture in it, while the master try to unify humans but knowing his failure made him decided to suicide while saving the rest of the normal humans so his creation will not destroy themselves.
Conclusion:
Villians of MW:TRW and Fallout > better than their sequels.
Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome has Tina Turner,
Fallout 3 has Liam Nelson.
Conclusion: having a A-star performer doesn't always guarantee the success of the work.
Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome turns into a disney film at the second part by introducing those orphans. Fallout 3 has unkillable children.
Conclusion: One step ahead, two steps back.
Mad Max Beyong Thunderdome has received bigger budget but produced only standard quality work. Fallout 3 has 20mil budget and only god knows what the end-product will be.
Conclusion: Having a bigger budget doesn't as always, guarantee the success of the work.
Just my one-man thought at the afternoon, in my office.
Here's my thought:
Both franchise got their massive attention from the 2nd sequel. In this case, Fallout 2 and Mad Max: The Road Warrior (or FO2 and MM:TRW)
Conclusion: Their sequels are sucky/will suck/will not appeal to even the most casual player.
MM:TRW has engaging car chase scene which in turns like the combat of Fallout. But in MM:Beyond Thunderdome, the car chase scene has been reduced. For me:
Car chase scene in MM:BTD = Fallout 3's V.A.T system.
Conclusion: One of the major element of both franchise suck so bad in their sequel.
MW:TRW has better character development. Lord Humungous is a better villian than Aunt Entity. The master is better than president.
(Especially Lord Humungous, I feel sad when the scene of he took out his Smith and Wesson Model 29 and have a small glimpse of a family picture in it, while the master try to unify humans but knowing his failure made him decided to suicide while saving the rest of the normal humans so his creation will not destroy themselves.
Conclusion:
Villians of MW:TRW and Fallout > better than their sequels.
Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome has Tina Turner,
Fallout 3 has Liam Nelson.
Conclusion: having a A-star performer doesn't always guarantee the success of the work.
Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome turns into a disney film at the second part by introducing those orphans. Fallout 3 has unkillable children.
Conclusion: One step ahead, two steps back.
Mad Max Beyong Thunderdome has received bigger budget but produced only standard quality work. Fallout 3 has 20mil budget and only god knows what the end-product will be.
Conclusion: Having a bigger budget doesn't as always, guarantee the success of the work.
Just my one-man thought at the afternoon, in my office.
