Fallout Boy (John Woo style)

Army Of One

Army Of One





alec:
... The stuff that is designed by mister A, drawn in pencils by missus G, inked by mister F and lettered by ...

Commercial art is just that, an assembly line.

Part of the art of creation is identifying images one wants to render to presentation level. A dozen or more sketches might pave the way to one keeper. The rest went into the portfolio, never knew when the 'process' might have as much selling power as the finished piece.

If you are in an academic program and have never been asked ''is this all you've done ?'', then you might have impressed the instructor with your work ethic, or
you ended up in the art class intended for non majors and athletes on scholarship.

alec, presentation is part of the process, and supporting your work, some times with extreme prejudice is a skill that must be practiced. When to ignore, when to confront, and when to lead the flippant into a lawyer's rhetorical trap. Can not let the casual remark of a motor mouth steal the thunder of a drawing taken to presentation levels of detail.

How good is the work I've seen? I was impressed with your avatar thumb nail.
I can see you are true to the hard copy level when I see the above rendering.
You must decide how much polish you need later, if you choose to emulate the commercial artists of the '50's. Perhaps an old issue of the New Yorker Magazine or The Saturday Evening Post will provide examples in how free flowing pen and ink rendering can be.

I look forward to any image you choose to show, and am most interested in the Perk and Traits work in progress.



4too
 
Wow! I have been granted a reply by 4too! (Of which I don't quite understand everything, but that is besides the point.)

Anyway, maybe I get carried away a little too much when it comes to that 'army of one' thing, but I have great respect for artists who pull everything off by themselves and are able to deliver quality that complete think tanks can not match. (Not that I am up to such things, but again, that is besides the question.)

I love the old New Yorker cartoonists, especially Peter Arno and Chas Addams and Hokinson. All of them masters with the brush, a tool which I should use more often, because practising with it really pays off. Do I wat to emulate those old masters? No, not really. While I wouldn't mind if my work were to look like theirs, I can't help to think that I've got some sort of 'alec-ness' in my work that can in time become just as good.

Yes, delusions of grandeur those are. But so are a lot of things.

gunvaultboykb9.png
 
St. Exupery cartoons!

Better and better, man. A shame your disgust for digital media has the scanner foul up your image tones.
 
i doubt that one of you, would like to see alecs version in Fallout 3.

keept it real, original. no hating, though.
 
The only thing that bothers me in the first picture(and in Alec's avatar) is, that I have never seen hate in the Vault boys eyes, and there should never be any, and thus the second picture is much better, but I like the over all style of Alec's art, and I like it a lot.
 
alec said:
http://img486.imageshack.us/img486/8546/gunvaultboykb9.png

Okay, THAT's perfect.

Of course it's a different style than Fallout, but that's not even remotely on topic (i.e. Schuljunge, stuff it and shut it).

Quality can not be measured by how much you manage to put into a picture. We're talking about a minimalist style here, so less is better. It's not a baroque painting, it's a cartoon.
 
Back
Top