"Fallout" developed by CD Projekt Red?

CD Project Red is a kind of weird Mirror Universe Bethesda.

They are amazing, beautiful, wonderful writers.

And their combat and exploration is shit.

The Witcher 3 is some of the most amazing game writing ever committed to keyboard but there's a hundred identical villages and randomly generated bandits, Drowners, and Hags.
 
CT Phipps said:
And their combat and exploration is shit.
Click to expand...
How is Bethesda doing better in any of those areas compared to the Witcher 3? You could argue that Fallout 4 has better combat then Fallout 3. But that is a tricky thing, since Fallout was never meant to be a shooter. That would be like if CD Red changed the Witcher into a top down RTS with resources and base building for example.
 
Crni Vuk said:
How is Bethesda doing better in any of those areas compared to the Witcher 3? You could argue that Fallout 4 has better combat then Fallout 3. But that is a tricky thing, since Fallout was never meant to be a shooter. That would be like if CD Red changed the Witcher into a top down RTS with resources and base building for example.
Click to expand...

I'm sure people here would love the Witcher party-based combat system RPG. ;)

That's a weird way to look at it as the Bethesda Fallout games aren't trying to be the isometric turn based ones. They're attempting to be shooters set in the Fallout world. Tales from the Borderlands goes to show you can do different game styles in well-developed worlds.
 
CT Phipps said:
I'm sure people here would love the Witcher party-based combat system RPG. ;)

That's a weird way to look at it as the Bethesda Fallout games aren't trying to be the isometric turn based ones. They're attempting to be shooters set in the Fallout world. Tales from the Borderlands goes to show you can do different game styles in well-developed worlds.
Click to expand...
Do you mind actually answering our point's rather then totally ignoring them?
 
CT Phipps said:
I'm sure people here would love the Witcher party-based combat system RPG. ;)

That's a weird way to look at it as the Bethesda Fallout games aren't trying to be the isometric turn based ones. They're attempting to be shooters set in the Fallout world. Tales from the Borderlands goes to show you can do different game styles in well-developed worlds.
Click to expand...
Who said anything about that those kind of games can't work?

The point I am trying to make is a whole different one. What I tried to say is that if you follow the vision of the original Fallout 1 developers, there is no way in hell that a Fallout sequel would be realized as shooter - the Fallout developers said it even by them self, that they would have never made a sequel anything else but a top down and turn based game. Turning a Fallout sequel in an first person shooter would only happen if you either don't understand Fallout or if you don't give a shit what the original developers wanted to emulate and achieve with their design decisions.
 
One area CD Projekt Red would excel in is realizing "Mature Title" means Mature Title.

Drugs and murder is fine but sex? OH NO, THE CHILDREN!
 
CT Phipps said:
OH NO, THE CHILDREN!
Click to expand...

Problem solved.
Oh and BTW, this is what 18+ actually means, IT'S NOT FOR CHILDREN. If it got into their hands, it's a bad parenting. The Witcher got away with it rather easy. The 1st one even featured fully nude forest girls.
 
0wing said:

Problem solved.
Oh and BTW, this is what 18+ actually means, IT'S NOT FOR CHILDREN. If it got into their hands, it's a bad parenting. The Witcher got away with it rather easy. The 1st one even featured fully nude forest girls.
Click to expand...


The others actually depicted consensual sex with adults! Goodness!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top