We can haz discussions without personally insulting the guy, yes?
We can haz discussions without personally insulting the guy, yes?
As opposed to the 400-pound, immobile, neckbeard-having, Trilby-wearing sacks of shit who constitute gamers and Fallout fans? Where are you going with this? Show up to a volunteer effort or do some activism. There are normal people in every camp.
Criticism is fine. But there's a line where criticism turns into personal insults, and I'd rather we don't cross that line.We can haz discussions without personally insulting the guy, yes?
He's a willful public figure, he's fair game for criticism. I don't think anyone is just insulting him out of nowhere.
Well, look at the poor guy. Unfortunate body and face, with gyno on top of it. The green mohawk doesn't help either, though I can imagine why the guy would think it does. These are the type of people who become extreme SJWs.
I didn't mean to insult him. I actually don't think gyno, or any other deformity, is laughing matter and I didn't even intend to poke fun at his chubbiness (what I meant by "unfortunate body and face"). I'm just saying that things like that have a significant effect on one's personality, so I can believe these rumors about him wanting to make women unkillable like how Bethesda makes children unkillable.It's a set of personal insults with a very, very tenuous conclusion attached. He could have made the same point without personally insulting the guy.
True, Arcade and Veronica weren't written homosexual because they had to fill a "gay quota". However, with Arcade, I'd say that they presented his homosexuality in a forced manner. That "lover don't make good confidantes" line felt so out of place that I just had to think that they put it there only to say "he fucks men", it was very stupid. It would have felt a lot more natural if his homosexuality was knowledge that you could only get if you had the Confirmed Bachelor perk.Characters like Arcade Gannon and Veronica weren't designed to be homosexual and lesbian because the developers felt it was necessary to include that because otherwise they 'weren't with the times'.
These characters were written like this because the designers felt it worked well with them.
That's not what I'm saying at all. I'm just saying that the line in which Arcade's homosexuality is revealed is unnatural, it feels forced.Gay people only talking about homosexuality to gay people is more natural? Huh. I must be living on some alien planet.
That's not what I'm saying at all. I'm just saying that the line in which Arcade's homosexuality is revealed is unnatural, it feels forced.Gay people only talking about homosexuality to gay people is more natural? Huh. I must be living on some alien planet.
Another thing that makes homosexuality feel forced in the entirety of the game is the fact that there are no homophobic people. Only ones mentioned are Caesar's Legion, but it's not represented in any way.
Yeah, I guess that makes sense, but with that in mind I think even providing that bit of lore that "Caesar's Legion is homophobic" was a mistake. They should have had just shut up about it, not mention homophobia at all, especially with how irredeemable the Legion already is.To be fair, there wasn't really any good way to represent it; you only have a glimpse of Legion society, and having a part of the camp dedicated to crucifying homosexuals would be a waste of resources.
If the Legion was a bit more fleshed out though as a faction, perhaps they could have shown their homophobia without going into sheer cartoon villain territory.
Why would it be non-existent? The anarchy of the bombs falling suddenly made people all accepting, with no one sticking to the old prejudices? Let's not forget that the world retained all the culture of the 50s and from what I remember 1950s US wasn't famous about its kindness to homosexual people.Again, I don't think it's all that unreasonable to suppose that three hundred years in the future homophobia is virtually non-existent.