Fallout TV Series season 2 teaser for a trailer

I found this on RPG codex. Maybe its of interest to the people here.


Makes largely agreeable points when he at least talks about Fallout itself instead of politics or race, which is why people dunk on him so much on YouTube by calling him a racist, they fixate on the part where he mentions politics and race instead of countering the points about how the show is bad itself when he reviewed season 1. I haven't seen people like Mauler and Creetosis receive hate when they reviewed the show, since they mostly focused on the show, unlike Synthetic Man.
 
i'd LOVE to make my contribution to this. you see, oxhorn, you know, the fat waste of a life who prefers neglecting his children, has called season 2 A LOVE LETTER to new vegas.

Screenshot 2025-09-02 173236.png

Personally, i think obituary is a better fit.
 
View attachment 37713
can't wait to see the show runners OC destroy vegas by his edgy power
Damn, I didn't even notice that little detail in Cooper's Season 2 Teaser Poster, GOOD EYE!

:jawdrop:


And yeah, let's see how BRUTAL this season is going to be in regards to screwing up the Established Lore/Game Continuity???



However I do know that it's going to get REAL ugly, especially for the New Vegas Fans...
I'm at the edge of my seat just simply thinking about it now!


:facepalm: :-x :-?
 
i'd LOVE to make my contribution to this. you see, oxhorn, you know, the fat waste of a life who prefers neglecting his children, has called season 2 A LOVE LETTER to new vegas.

View attachment 37702
Personally, i think obituary is a better fit.
This is the same person who says retcons and lore inconsistency are fine, so do with that what you will (i disregard any opinion he has on Fallout).
 
That poster does look cool though

On a related note, I’m interested in seeing how the Deathclaw ends up being. The glimpse of it we see in the trailer looks like it has the head of a bull, which is kind of an interesting take. Not lore accurate, but better than the weird skeletal faces from the 3D games in my opinion.
 
Last edited:
aren't they? they are slavers, misogynistic, rapists, the only good thing about them is how raiders fear them so their roads and the settlements in their region are safe, they also destroy cultures, hell it is one of the reasons why Ulysses in his weird mindset
Roads in NCR are safe too and they have functioning rail systems between major settlements. The whole reasons khans, vipers etc. are in Mojave is that they were driven out of NCR. Sadly there are many of NewVegas fans who haven't played 1 and 2 and take their entire conception of NCR from the Mojave (which isn't NCR state or even NCR territory).
 
You putting them in the context of the real world, Fallout setting is completely different than ours. In the real world they would be no better than terrorists, in a post-apocalyptic setting with no governements or rules of any kind established they be might an actual viable solution. Basically what Caesar is doing is necessary evils to establish a better future.
I think other factions, like NCR (yes, I know they are flawed), have showcased there are methods of redeveloping civilization without resorting to enslavement. Caesar believes what he's doing is necessary which is why he is an interesting character. But, I think it is very clear that they are an objectively negative choice for the vast majority of the region.
 
aren't they? they are slavers, misogynistic, rapists, the only good thing about them is how raiders fear them so their roads and the settlements in their region are safe, they also destroy cultures, hell it is one of the reasons why Ulysses in his weird mindset
I always felt the various NPC dialogues about the legion roads being safe as a clear parallel to how Hitler and Mussolini "made the trains run on time"
 
Back
Top