Briosafreak said:
We`re not talking of Bande dessiné but just comic strips right?
If you look at the history of sequential art, you'll soon learn that "comics" are a typical American medium. Comics are originally low budget productions, printed on cheap paper, often in black and white or - if colours are used - with flat colours. The first real comics were about superheroes and stuff like that. They're an all American product (they fit nicely in the American way of thinking).
The 'bande dessiné' you are talking about is basically European. The quality of the product itself is usually much better (I'm not talking about the content), the size differs and so does the printing technique. The content of the stories told differs too: no superheroes in Europe, but rather rogues and rascals. (There are exceptions, of course, like 'Little Orphan Annie' by Harold Gray, but these comic strips were printed in newspapers). Anyway, even Canada has its own traditions (which, imho, are superior to the American traditions).
Today these differences and traditions have almost completely disappeared: there are now Dutch and French and German and... comics (lowbudget, superheroes, blahblahblah), and American comics which look far more European (story/plot: Clowes, Ware, ...).
So: it's kind of stupid to make a distinction between the two anno 2003 (I mean, what about manga then?). That's why Eisner prefers the term 'sequential art': an art and literary form that deals with the arrangement of pictures or images and words to narrate a story or dramatize an idea. It's a discipline alongside film making - to which it is truly a forerunner.
That's why I included Hergé in my list.