welsh said:
I recently saw Night of the Hunter- this is a movie that begs to be redone.
I have that on DVD, but haven't watched it yet. I've actually had it for about six months. I couldn't get into it, but since I've been watching silent films lately I think I'll finally be able to give it a go.
BTW, do you remember a while ago when you asked me about my film history project? If you remember I brought up the Hayes Code/Motion Picture Production Code. Check into it -- you can find it in its entirety on the Web, even down to the revisions made after it was initially drafted in '30 -- and you'll see why it is that a lot of films ended up being re-worked and fucked up in the process because they weren't allowed to say/refer to/show whatever. We're talking everything from miscegeny to rape to clergy being portrayed as villains. (Which is one reason
Night of the Hunter is of interest since it has a villainous preacher...) Hell,
Citizen Kane had to have a scene changed (the one w/the dance girls) because it was set in a brothel, and that went against the Code.
welsh said:
One of my favorites is Orson Well's A Touch of Evil. This is such a good flick.
Isn't it amazing that Charlton Heston who is such an abominable actor was in so many great movies? Of course, they're largely great in spite of him rather than because of him, but that's another issue.
Personally, I think it's a tragedy that people are largely closed to black and white cinema today. There's a lot of things that can be done w/expressionistic lighting, etc. that simply can't be done w/color. However, no producer is going to let a film be made in this medium unless it's a farm film like
Clerks, which took zero advantage of the medium because it was a budgetary constraint rather than an artistic choice.
OTB