Fox News on Holland

They have admitted thousands of radical Islamists who have not assimilated and are threatening the stability of the nation.

Oh dear God...


Did anyone else notice his grammar, syntax, writing skills, etc are equal to those of a 10-year old retard?
 
If anyone would make a good canidate for Euthanasia its that author! Not only lying, but about a place most American's dont understand...so they will most likely take his words as fact.

My apologies to my European friends.

:evil: ,
The Vault Dweller
 
Now, now, no need to assume responsability for Fucks News just because you live in the same piece of land.
 
Sure, everyone knows the UN has worse reputation than Goebbels' dream of a propaganda channel.

One more trolling comment like that, and I'll be wearing your teeth as a necklace.
 
PS: Stop, that's the second warning now. One more and I'm banning you for a week.
 
Jebus, you too. Stop spamming, you know the rule (eventho you are gloating).
 
Well, speaking of euthanasing people, some news from my old stomping grounds of Rostov-on-don. Two girls, one 17 the other 14 have been sentenced to 5 and 4 years in a prison colony for killing their neighbor. The thing is, the neighbor paid them to do it.
She had been in a terrible car accident and every time she moved she suffered horrible pain. She was stuck in her home and couldn't leave, so she asked the two girls to help her end her suffering. At first the girls tried to inject air into her veins, but couldn't manage it. Then the woman suggested they strangle her to death with a rope, so they did. Then they took the money they were promised, about 160 dollars (which wasn't even all the money in the house, or even in the room, they only took what the woman had said they could) and left.

Ah, its great to be going home.
 
Still, actually doing a "murder" does violate the laws. Even if the victim wants it or not.
 
Its actually illustrated a problem with the Euthanising laws in Russia. There is no clear definition of what it is, who can do it, or where it applies.
 
I like how he used drug usage and prostitution as a slippery slope towards infanticide.

I don't see what tokin' and the pleasures of the flesh have to do with Designer Babies.
 
Commissar Lauren said:
Its actually illustrated a problem with the Euthanising laws in Russia. There is no clear definition of what it is, who can do it, or where it applies.

There actually is an Euthanising law in Russia? I would assume this would fall under the regular murder laws, even if it was a mercy murder.
 
I think I said it wrong before. Its still illegal, but carries different legal ramifications then regular murder (As far as I know). Its the primary reason the girls are serving less time then orginally anticipated.
 
Absolutes

Absolutes

B.:
... I don't see what tokin' and the pleasures of the flesh have to do with Designer Babies.

The article is purposely short. It feeds the need for agreement of a targeted audience. This is commentary with an agenda, but it is still commercial first , then editorial, in over all intent.

If it doesn't stoke the fires of fear, it strokes the anxiety synapses and then offers the tentative 'relief' that moral absolutes, absolutely enforced will solve all social ills.

A longer treatment might have shed light on the conditions for 'baby killing', and developed a larger social and historical context so the inclusion of other moral issues, the 'sins' of drugs and prostitution, and Nazi's killing Ann Frank, might have been less a 90 degree shift of , ... titillation.

In this absolutist idealogy one moral failure implies a moral weakness in general, or rather, in TOTAL. The ""radical Islamists"" allowed to swarm the ""open border"" seem to be the - wages of sin - for not having Cal Thomas's ""governing moral standard"".

Islamists. The boogey men of our era of neo - con, neo - faith.

Hordes of Islamists, a last reel moralising for Cal Thomas's non specific commentary about euthanasia.


4too
 
Do they have euthanasia laws in Germany today? I ask this because I am reminded of the cannibal case. Is there a difference between a contract between healthy adults and terminally ill adults?

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/040702.html

Meiwes, who'd been fantasizing about cannibalism since childhood, is said to have exchanged messages with at least 200 like-minded souls, most of whom he met through Web sites catering (sorry, poor choice of words) to cannibal fetishists. By and large his correspondents--even a few who went to his house for play dates--weren't ready to do more than talk about being eaten, but in March 2001 he hooked up with a fellow who was willing to put his money where Meiwes's mouth was. Bernd Juergen Brandes, like Meiwes a 40-ish computer geek, traveled to Rotenburg and permitted his host to slice off and cook his central extremity, which the two then attempted to eat. (Apparently it came out a bit tough.) Later, after Brandes had knocked back several further courses of liquor, cough syrup, and sleeping pills, Meiwes stabbed him to death in a bathtub, stored most of the body in his freezer, and eventually ate about 20 kilograms of it. All of this, if you can believe media accounts--I rely here mainly on the BBC--was done with Brandes's full foreknowledge and cooperation, and Meiwes captured the proceedings on video. Police got wind of it only after they received a call about a year and a half later from an alarmed Austrian student who'd just seen another of Meiwes's ads seeking dinner partners. At trial--this was Germany's first cannibalism case--Meiwes's lawyer argued that the victim had been asking for it, a defense that the court seems to have bought at least partially, since the killer was convicted of manslaughter rather than murder and sentenced to eight and a half years. Many have condemned the sentence as too mild, but defenders say, hey--consenting adults.
 
Here is another tidbit about a slippery slope......

I heard this just yesterday on NPR.

It seems that some conservatives are worried about the disparity between the number of 'conservative' instructors vs. 'liberal' instructors on college campuses in our nation. They believe that the students are somehow getting a skewed point of view by listening to all those dangerous liberals and are therefore proposing to have some sort of quota system to ensure that conservative thinking teachers will be hired and put into positions of influence.

I also heard a report on NPR about a week ago, that talked about how jobs in the different lobby groups and think tanks in Washington are also being now consistently, and methodically staffed with conservatives. In fact, there is apparently and actual weekly meeting among the conservative power players in Washington, to review which positions are becoming vacant in the near future and who will be best to fill them. Mind you they are not outright firing anyone, or forcing anyone out. We are just talking about people retiring, or new positions that are created. The end result of course is that the lobby groups and think tanks are becoming mostly staffed by conservatives.

Nobody is hiding any of these activities. I heard both on an hour long discussion program on NPR, where the discussion was about what implication they might have. (Unfortunately I can't recall which one off hand. I will try to remember and post later if anyone cares.)

The justification was that the conservatives feel that they are just exercising a right to be heard.

I will refrain from expressing my opinion about this at this time, and see what all of you have to say first.
 
Back
Top