sai | GLYPH
First time out of the vault

Jiggly McNerdington said:I'm sort of meandering all over the place again, but it just smacks of NMA paranoia to me. Read the whole clip Brother None posted there (Dunno if that's all of it, don't have this issue yet). They say at worst "Some of the more rabid Fallout fan communities", nothing like "Those sons of bitches at NMA who I hate with every fiber of my soul". On top of that, the "The truth of the matter is no one knows a damn thing yet about whether the game will be good or not."
RAGE BALL
Not to be picky, but context and word choice go a long way toward painting a picture. It's why books...work.
"Some gamers (including us) are thrilled by how faithfully Bethesda is preserving the look and tone of the old games while bringing the franchise into the current millennium, while others (especially some of the more rabid Fallout fan communities) continue to deride every new fact, screen, or random piece of info that comes out of Bethesda about the game."
This whole sequence of statements boils down to "we are logical, they are petty."
Thrilled? Implies permanence. The demo may be out but the game isn't, and this article is about the game. We've got somewhat of a mixed context here. Especially when later the article states that most of the game is a huge unknown. Might a better expression than "thrilled" be anticipating or looking forward to? I guess us rabid fan communities aren't the only steadfast in our ways.
Then they launch into what they're thrilled about. Macro-concepts. I'm not arguing that they shouldn't have used such things, however, there's a difference between generalizing and presenting broad concepts...
There's a huge difference in implication between saying "we like this for A and B" then turning around and saying "others just keep on hating everything." It paints the picture that 'we' are logical and decent, while 'others' are illogical and petty.
And then the use of "rabid Fallout fan communities" rather than rabid Fallout fans. There's a difference of aim. One would think without the parenthesis, "others" would mean "other gamers", but apparently it means other game communities.
So the magazine is good and logical while some communities (in their entirety - as per implication) should be disregarded for being full of illogical screaming monkeys.
They won't curse off NMA in a legitimate article, because a legitimate article needs to look legitimate. Legitimacy gives credence to their statements.