Autoduel76
Look, Ma! Two Heads!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbf6c/fbf6ccde05e9d918c547eb2285cb677af91fbaaa" alt=""
Brother None said:And you are still not seeing the difference of money is in how much you spend to convince people per-person, which is why your "ton of money" remark is irrelevant.
Blizzard works with the excitement about their game that's already there. They don't have to worry about who gets to see it, they talk to fans as much as media. Bethesda uses money and a press party to get gaming press to talk about a game they wouldn't normally talk about, and to talk about it more excitedly than they would otherwise.
Riding the wave of excitement vs. manipulating the media to create excitement. Your attempts to equate the two are kinda funny.
What wave of excitement are you talking about?
And how is anything in a "per person" spending, in any way relevent?
What I find funny is that you find Blizzard's method to be acceptable and Bethesda's outragous.
Personally, I find Blizzard's method a bit of a turn off for my tastes. Its much like when I saw the Xbox 360 have their big event before release, in a concert atmosphere that was broadcast on MTV. It made me feel old and think "they truly aren't marketing video games to me anymore, but to these MTV kids"
But, in the end, its simpyl another method of throwing money out there to hype your product. The idea that the per-person cost is relevent doesn't make any sense? How about per media person cost? Blizzard's event still cost way more per media-person in attendance.
But does it really matter? no.
Bethesda's method might not be the best, in terms of marketing to you, but I fail to see how its more "outragous" than Blizzards. In fact, you were arguing with me just a week or so ago that reviews don't sell games anyway, so I really fail to see why this would outrage you, at all, in the first place.
Blizzard made the excitement. They aren't riding a wave of pre-existing excitement. Once again, it's not like they just stumbled across a group of 20 thousand starcraft fans milling around in a park and then just decided to unveil their game there.
No. They put out a bunch of money to hold a huge event, in which fans were invited. I don't know why you think that Bethesda couldn't get a huge crowd of fans to show up also, if they went that route. Its been done before by various companies. Was Blizzard's on a huge scale? Yeah, but again, how is that good?
Wasn't your whole point that Bethesda went overboard? (even though the article clearly stated that Bethesda's media-event wasn't the most lavish out there)
Yet, when Blizzard goes overboard with that type of media event, somehow that's ok?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0261/d02616978c6a89594536e0025eed9c1b66d8f321" alt="Rolling Eyes :roll: :roll:"
Both are nothing more than financial decisions to generate hype via holding expensive media events. As that article points out, its common practice. If you don't like it, that's fine. Your perogotive, but to defend Blizzard's as perfectly ok while being outraged at Bethesda's is simply hypocritical.