Huh, Las Vegas is a really huge city

Well, nuclear weaponry IS incredibly powerful, so 2 missles *may* level the city completly, why not. Of course some buildlings may withstand the destruction to a degree, but overall there wouldn't be that much left standing.
 
Well, I mean LV is huge enough to be a target. Then in FNV we *may* witness a flat with a few landmarks :shock:

However I really wonder why Washington wasn't totally destroy, geeez at least it's capital.
 
Dr.Xen said:
However I really wonder why Washington wasn't totally destroy, geeez at least it's capital.
Because Bethesda likes to be incompetent, lazy and unrealistic.
 
Dr.Xen said:
Well, I mean LV is huge enough to be a target. Then in FNV we *may* witness a flat with a few landmarks :shock:

However I really wonder why Washington wasn't totally destroy, geeez at least it's capital.

Well, I doubt Washington has *that many* first prority targets - White House and what else? There are many other places in USA that are better targets for concetrated nuclear missle barrage.
 
Ravager69 said:
Well, I doubt Washington has *that many* first prority targets - White House and what else? There are many other places in USA that are better targets for concetrated nuclear missle barrage.

Still, wouldn't you agree that if Washington DC was hit with nuclear weapons that the damage would be worse than a few flattened landmarks and government buildings while the rest looks as if it was firebombed?
 
Las Vegas is invincible as long as the house bets against a missile landing.
Hahaha.
 
Ravager69 said:
Dr.Xen said:
Well, I mean LV is huge enough to be a target. Then in FNV we *may* witness a flat with a few landmarks :shock:

However I really wonder why Washington wasn't totally destroy, geeez at least it's capital.

Well, I doubt Washington has *that many* first prority targets - White House and what else? There are many other places in USA that are better targets for concetrated nuclear missle barrage.

If it was me i'd be tempted to bomb it for the moral damage alone. "Now we bring you breaking news. Washington DC has been hit with nuclear weaponry, resulting in the destruction of the white house and thousands of surrounding buildings. At this stage its unclear if the first family made it to safety, but the same cannot be said for the millions of civilians caught in the blast".

That's why the Americans bombed the targets they did in WWII isn't it? No Military value, just proving they could and would wipe city's of innocents off the map to hit the japanese leadership where it hurt and demoralize japanese troops around the globe until they surrendered.
 
In WWII that's true, but in Great war I guess the leaders should realize that kingdom had finally came, so they won't do moral damage but merely destroy things as much as possible. Thus big cities are first target.
 
Dr.Xen said:
In WWII that's true, but in Great war I guess the leaders should realize that kingdom had finally came, so they won't do moral damage but merely destroy things as much as possible. Thus big cities are first target.

Even by this logic, hitting Washington is a good move.
 
Fenwick said:
I thought cause FO3 was set 10-30 years after the bombs fell. :wink:

Skyscrapers ain't trees, they won't grow back after 30 years. They would most likely fall in ruins even more after that time.

I'm assuming you weren't joking btw 8-)
 
Reconite said:
Dr.Xen said:
However I really wonder why Washington wasn't totally destroy, geeez at least it's capital.
Because Bethesda likes to be incompetent, lazy and unrealistic.

Playing in a completely flat featureless desert is not entertaining, even if it is realistic.

Stop the generalizations.
 
Eh Sorrow, I don't think that comparison goes up.

I don't remember Necropolis' real name but the city was never directly hit by a nuclear warhead.

Instead it suffered the after effects of a nuclear blast when a nearby military base was blown up.
 
Well, it looks like a large portion of the city got cut down by a blast wave.
Hiroshima was practically razed to the ground with a lot of flat terrain, but I suspect that it was mainly due to wooden architecture - on most of photos I've seen, there are remaining stone buildings that were almost intact (in comparison to the surroundings, of course), while everything around them was completely destroyed.

So yeah, it could receive a direct hit or a very close miss.
 
Not to the extend that multi storied buildings are still standing with most of the internal matter still intact.

Perhaps on the edges of the blast wave but definitely not near the center where you often find the biggest buildings.
 
In Fallout 3 we never got the details of what was exactly dropped on Washington.

Or atleast i didn't.

So we can't say for sure but after bombs being dropped on the city and 200 years of exposure, scavenging and little to no maintenance one must imagine that there would be little left. Under the assumption that their materials and architecture resembled or mirrored ours.

I also read that Washington is built on a swamp so unless the climate was changed drasticly it would be slightly...wetter.

After all it's Science! not science.

If New Vegas was bombed and all that was left was sand and fused glass then well it just wouldn't be much fun would it :)
 
The Dutch Ghost said:
Not to the extend that multi storied buildings are still standing with most of the internal matter still intact.

Perhaps on the edges of the blast wave but definitely not near the center where you often find the biggest buildings.
There were multi-stored non-wooden buildings standing in Hiroshima with all around them completely flattened.

Also, Necropolis could be a very big city with a big amount of big buildings, like this one. So, not all of them would be at the centre of explosion.


About Hiroshima buildings:

Survival of some structures
Atomic Bomb Dome
 
Back
Top