Tagaziel said:
BigBoss said:
I think it matters on what "level" were the NCR technologically advanced. When it comes to vehicular armor and flight capabilities, the NCR does have better technology, but not enough to make a big difference in a way. But still, their tech is more advanced, whether they scavenged it or not.
The overall technological level matters. Overall, the NCR is about equal to World War I, minus transportation and flight. The fact that they have small amounts of power armor and Vertibirds doesn't really change the situation.
Yes, I agree with you here, the overall technological level does matter. But in this exact paragraph and point we are not talking about overall technological level. We are talking about the individual basis' on which warfare is engaged. If we are removing transportation and flight, then the NCR is equal to Cold War in terms of infantry warfare, not to World War I. World War I was a series of trench-battles because automatic weapons were not produced on a mass-level yet. In fact, the only side that had automatic weapons which could be carried by one man were the Germans, in their "Storm Trooper" (what the Nazi SA organization was subsequently named after).
The infantry/ground basis of World War I was a war fought with first generation chemical weapons, single-shot rifles, hand-to-hand combat, and heavy machine guns which took two or more men to operate. The NCR is more advanced in all of these things, such as they have rifles with load in clips in which you do not need to reload after each individual round, outdating and technologically over-powering the single-shot rifle. They have much more powerful hand-to-hand technology considering that, in World War I hand-to-hand combat was formed around the basis of rifle and trench knife fights, in which the NCR has the technological capacity to utilize Power Fists for this purpose (as shown in Fallout 2). They also have Light Machine Guns which can be operated by one man, and can be carried fast and easily at will, with much better accuracy than the World War I machine guns. Keep in mind, that I've taken the liberty of leaving out the scavenged T-45d Power Armor units and the heavy weapons the NCR utilizes.
Tagaziel said:
BigBoss said:
In the matter of resources, production, and utilization of warfare paraphernalia, and war economy/warfare industry, the NCR does not have unlimited resources or a nearly unlimited workforce to produce an effective war effort by materials and industrialization alone (in such, they are forced to resort to scavenging for what they can't create by hand), so they are less advanced in this matter.
I.e. they are less advanced overall. The nation with the strongest economy wins in a war, not the one most advanced in terms of technology. The Third Reich may have been more advanced than the Soviet Union (though that's debatable, since German tanks used in Barbarossa were very much inferior to the mass-produced T-34s), but the latter's sheer industrial capacity allowed to counter the quality gap, especially when the experienced veteran divisions were redeployed from Asia.
Here it is the terms of the industry area of economy on how quickly a nation can produce weapons and vehicles, including recruit and train a standing army, not economy as a whole (though no doubt other areas of economy have factors that play in with industry). When your taking in the Soviet Union for example, this is a communist country, and in communist economy free-market policies and companies which are based off profit and capital are illegal here.
Economy is a different factor to play in a war between a capitalist and communist nation, or in this case, a Fascist nation (which utilizes Third Position economics and politics) and Communism. As one is dependent on a combination of free-market companies and factories and state directed companies/factories to produce their arms, while another is entirely a state controlled nation relying on a central, directed economy to develop its arms. When establishing a base argument about the effect economy plays in a war this large of scale, one has to take in the matter that these two economies operate in very different ways, and therefore the economic benefits and downfall that apply to one nation may not always apply to the other.
Also, the Third Reich had undetestable technological advantage over the allies, including the Soviet Union, United States, and United Kingdom (and especially France), but this mainly happened towards the center of the war). The King Tiger I and the notorious King Tiger II Tanks and Panzers I, II, III, and IV were no doubt better than the Shermans and T-34s, including the A13. They had better armor, and a larger gun where at the beginning of the war, some allied states were made with thin steel, where a regular Kar-86 round would go right through the armor, of course this was changed later. The German tanks also operated on the field of battle astonishingly, and were without a doubt the best tanks at the time. German late-war technology was able to compete with Cold War technology.
Tagaziel said:
BigBoss said:
When it comes to weapons and armor, the NCR are obviously much more advanced than WW-II era militaries, and not taking Power Armor and Energy Weapons into though, are about up-to-par with mid-Cold War era Western militaries.
No, they aren't. Their workhorse is a metal-and-wood battle rifle, there is little standardization in terms of weapons, they do not have access to artillery, helicopters, tanks, armored fighting vehicles, satellites, planes, and dozens of other technologies Cold War militaries had.
Again, you need to look at the big picture. You're focusing solely on infantry weapons, completely ignoring the fact that it's just one facet of warfare. If the NCR is on par with Cold War militaries, where are the helicopters providing transport for troops, giving them extreme mobility? Where are the military trucks rapidly delivering food, fuel, weapons, and ammunition? Where are artillery regiments capable of laying waste to enemy fortifications?
Many historians related that, if conventional warfare (i.e. non nuclear) broke out between the two powers, much of the fighting would be on the ground, and the individual infantry soldier would be the war winner, as he/she is with many wars. And as I recall, we were not talking about general warfare, we were relating it to post-nuclear warfare capabilities.
Also, the United States fell into decline after the Second World War because they will still recovering from a massive World Wide war. The UK had the same problem. You have to look at it this way. During the war, there was a large need for work. Men who weren't fighting (and women at home, not serving as medics) were needed to work factories for supplies and arms, crops for food, etc. There was a surplus of jobs. This was stimulated by what we call today, a war economy. The war was massive, therefore there were many jobs available, as any war of the era needs a workforce behind it to create the things needed for the war. Now look at this picture, after the war was over, there was no longer a need to employ so many people. People were laid off in mass levels. Many citizens of the UK said that post-war time was worse than war-time.
Tagaziel said:
BigBoss said:
That wiki info was taken from New Vegas. And you're right, anyone can post there, but the fact is 95% of the information on Nuka Pedia is verified.
Then how come there's zero references to back that bit up? LM is right to ask for sources, because anyone can post outrageous claims, but few can back it up. So far there's exactly zero references stating that the state of Maxson ever absorbed Lost Hills. All that's known about Maxson is contained in
this article. Note how it references the information.
If there are sources indicating that Lost Hills was absorbed by the NCR, please provide them. Otherwise, you're just generating white noise.
What are you talking about? He asked for a source, and I gave him one. If hes going to complain about the source I gave, well thats his right, but I'm not going to go digging around for his (or anyone elses) behalf.