Favre does look MVPish, and is certainly rising in the ranks of best QBs of all time, especially if he leads them to the Super Bowl.
He's not playing as well as his stats indicate, tho'. A few come-from-behind victories that did impress me nonwithstanding, he's simply not being asked to do too much.
This may sound odd, but the Seahawks D looked really good playing the Vikes, and I think some of the future opponents should take notes. In the first quarter, they limited Adrian Peterson to summat like 3.6 ypc and forced Favre to complete only dink-and-dunk passes to HBs and TEs. The Vikings O looked tepid, on both facets, and I don't think any other team's managed that so far.
Of course, our O couldn't stay on the field, and you can't expect the D to keep that up when they're on the field all the time. Still, with a more competent O and a good defensive setup, there's some lessons to be learned from the Seahawks game.
And it's part of the reason I'm not that impressed by Favre. Again, he and his statline look better because of surrounding talent and what he's asked to do, which is not often that much, though he has impressed at times when asked to do stuff.
Also fans can be so lulzy. Saw on blog-commentator note Favre "turned the Vikings from a good team into Super Bowl champions". I love it when people get ahead of themselves.
Also, Texans-Titans should be interesting. Sooner or later some team will figure out this Vince Young-Chris Johnson thing, and take away the run, you take away that team's O. Texans got as good a shot as any, solid run D.
Also
at GB's defensive woes. Even with a W, this team's chances to get into the post-season certainly just fell.