PALGN previews Fallout 3

Brother None

This ghoul has seen it all
Orderite
Another preview from the Australian rounds.<blockquote>From a gameplay perspective, most aspects are very solid. The emphasis on exploration and discovery are also punctuated with the interactions that you have between others in world and the numerous factions that are out and about. So exactly how you go about these things will determine your course towards the final destination. For example, if you are a jerk towards the sheriff in the first town you’ll likely visit, he’ll diplomatically blow you off. However, if you are polite, he will confide in you, which will have further implications. Your personal interface is now governed by the PIP-Boy 3000, which is upgraded from previous games and gives you access all your stats and inventories and what not.

Interacting with your environment is very important as well. Often you’ll search for water, though it will be contaminated by radiation. So you need to make a choice whether or not to heal yourself and take radiation damage, or go at it until you find another source of healing. At one stage, a radio signal was picked up about a man sheltering his family and asking for assistance. Upon discovery of their location, it was actually found that they’ve been dead for a long time, but left a lot of items for you to collect. It’s this part of Fallout 3, the numerous choices behind what you’ll be able to do that drive the game.

A point of contention in Fallout 3 is change in perspective. The game is now played from either first or third person. From the above mentioned gameplay features, the perspective fits in very well, though the one issue that remains relates to combat. Relying on playing like a first person shooter isn’t bad, though just like Bioshock, the combat doesn’t excel as much as the other aspects in the game. However, there are some great additions. In particular, the fact that you’ll have to be on the ball as weapons wear-and-tear, you’ll get to build custom weapons and pick-up and play with whatever you find.</blockquote>Link: Fallout 3 Preview on PAL Gaming Network.
 
This is the first preview I've actually read through in quite a while, and I instantly felt the goold ole boredom set in again. Talk about some old, same old. At least one can chuckle sadly at statements like how the game seems to be a mix of Oblivion and Bioshock.

I also gotta love that they mention stuff like how you treat the sheriff will affect how he treats you back.
I mean, that is pretty damn meat and potatoes of RPGs one would think. Still, I guess it's better that it's actually in there than if it would be mysteriously missing from all the previews.

Bleh, I really feel my interest in this game is at an all time low. It's pretty funny how I get more excited about something like Diablo 3, which is a sequel to games that I've always found sort of amusing but not great.
 
Bleh, I really feel my interest in this game is at an all time low. It's pretty funny how I get more excited about something like Diablo 3, which is a sequel to games that I've always found sort of amusing but not great.

I wonder how excited we'd be about FO3 if Bethesda hadn't turned Leon Boyarsky down before he went to Blizzard.
 
Ausir said:
I wonder how excited we'd be about FO3 if Bethesda hadn't turned Leon Boyarsky down before he went to Blizzard.

American Poet and abolitionist John Greenleaf Whittier (1807-1892) wrote, "For of all sad words of tongue or pen, the saddest are these: 'It might have been!'" Harriet Beecher Stowe (1811-1896)
 
I understand people are still clinging to Fallout 3 in search for a glimpse of fun and entertainment, something that could make it worth the while they spend clinging to Fallout 3, but in my humble opinion, people that are just generally uninterested in Fallout 3 should just give up and search for other games. Because, you know, I bet there lots and lots and lots of people saying "bugger! Fallout 3's gonna suck" but they really don't know what else to play and look forward too...

My personal advices would go for Purgatorio (mod for NWN2), Age of Decadence and Eschalon 2, but I should remember most of those people still have whole loads of long published outstanding RPGs to play...

So, @ you, Starwars, why?
 
Ausir said:
I wonder how excited we'd be about FO3 if Bethesda hadn't turned Leon Boyarsky down before he went to Blizzard.

Eh?

I thought Leon's been with Blizzard for quite a while now.
 
You are probably right Morbus.

At one point I really hate Fallout 3, the fact that the storyline has no connection whatsoever with the previous games, the change in gameplay, the general simplification of almost every element in general, the gearing towards the console crowd.

And yet for some damn reason I want to try the thing out, perhaps to know how much they ruined the Fallout atmosphere for me.
 
Brother None said:
Ausir said:
I wonder how excited we'd be about FO3 if Bethesda hadn't turned Leon Boyarsky down before he went to Blizzard.

Eh?

I thought Leon's been with Blizzard for quite a while now.

Yeah, but he did apply for a job at Bethesda in 2005 or so, between Troika's demise and joining Blizzard, and was turned down.
 
Ausir said:
Brother None said:
Ausir said:
I wonder how excited we'd be about FO3 if Bethesda hadn't turned Leon Boyarsky down before he went to Blizzard.
Eh?

I thought Leon's been with Blizzard for quite a while now.
Yeah, but he did apply for a job at Bethesda between Troika's demise and joining Blizzard.

What, in early 2005?

How do you know?
 
The Dutch Ghost said:
You are probably right Morbus.

At one point I really hate Fallout 3, the fact that the storyline has no connection whatsoever with the previous games, the change in gameplay, the general simplification of almost every element in general, the gearing towards the console crowd.

And yet for some damn reason I want to try the thing out, perhaps to know how much they ruined the Fallout atmosphere for me.
Bah, as long as you don't reward them for ruining it, I think Father Fallout is ok with it :mrgreen:
 
How do you know?

From the Codex, I think. Can't remember the details. But I remember there bing a thread in 2005 about Leon having approached Bethesda about working on FO3 and being turned down.
 
Seymour the spore plant said:
Ausir said:
From the Codex, I think.

Yep, he posted about it there after being shown the door by Bethesda.

Uh...no?

What he says there is that Troika approached Bethesda to work with them on Fallout 3 but Bethesda was not interested. He doesn't talk about himself applying to work for Bethesda on Fallout 3. Notice the key change in words: Troika to himself, and with to for.
 
Yeah, but there were rumors running around that time about one of the main Fallout developers having been turned down by Bethesda, which somehow, over the time, merged with the information that Leon approached Bethesda in the name of Troika, giving us the "Leon applied for a job at Bethesda but was turned down" meme.
 
And if the "one of the creators of Fallout applying for a job at Bethesda" rumor is correct, there's a 25% chance of it actually being Leon, since there wasn't much contact in the community with two out of the 6 people credited for original game design, which left us with either Leon, Tim, Jason or Chris.

And "I wonder how excited we'd be about FO3 if Bethesda hadn't turned [insert name here] down before he went to Blizzard." is just as valid regardless of which of the four it was.
 
Have any of these informed journalists actually even played a demo of the game, or are they still just regurgitating PR thrown at them by Beth?

How can they have such strong opinions about a game when, at best, they've only seen a scripted walk-through? Can you imagine if other media reacted the same way. Car Magazine: "This new car from Ford is going to be the best car ever. We know this because they showed us the clay model minitures, and because they've said it will come in red! Ford's PR manager even showed us how the new car will handle by pushing one of the clay models around a model track. It looked awesome! From what we could see the new traction control worked very well when some water was applied to the track, and the car accelerated strongly which shows they've sorted all their fuel injection issues from the previous model." :roll:

Mick
 
So, @ you, Starwars, why?

It's initially the warm fuzzy feelings I bear towards the first two games, which make me interested in Fallout 3 in some manner. I still feel connected to Fallout and am morbidly interested in what happens with the franchise and games..
I've also been reading NMA for a really long time as well, and I don't plan to stop.

I have no doubt that I will try Fallout 3 at some point or another. But yeah, I feel quite not-so-interested in this game at the moment. Previews are spewing the same stuff over, and what new stuff we've seen since that first GameInformer preview has been minor indeed.

But my point with the Diablo example is that it's pretty amusing that I am more interested in a sequel to a game (Diablo, Diablo 2) that is really quite far from what I would like in games in general than I am with the sequel to a game (Fallout 1) which was something that I felt catered almost completely to what I would want from a game.
 
Back
Top