PC Gamer on Fallout

Brother None

This ghoul has seen it all
Orderite
PC Gamer has this short bit on Fallout (my highlight):<blockquote>Falling out.

You know what would be a good idea right about now? Why not track down the Fallout box - set on budget release? Go on, acquaint yourself with a classic. Just in case y'know, a certain PC games magazine were about to blow the lid on the high-tech third in the post-apocalypse RPG series. Developers Bethesda have launched forums for the game, which are sadly so far filled with Fallout fanboys telling Bethesda not to muck with their precious game world. I don't know if they are expecting elves, but they should give Bethesda a chance.

Author, Ross Atherton, PC gamer June 2007.</blockquote>Thanks Muff.

Meanwhile, here's what the developers themselves had to say on our behaviour:<blockquote>How do you feel about the negative comments and predictions taken by some of the Fallout community? Has it affected your opinions in anyway? What do you feel towards such pointless and nonconstructive comments?

[Gonzalez] Is there a such thing as a forum without trolling and other brands of negativity? Could such a thing even be called a forum qua forums? Doubtful. :P What I’ll say about the FO forums is that most complaints here are paired with concrete and even reasonable solutions, with which I agree and disagree on my own terms. There are certain forum communities that’ll remain nameless ( *cough* WoW General *cough* ) that make a e-career out of flaming for flaming’s sake, which makes me greatly appreciate the constructive, albeit sometimes harsh, criticisms I find here.

[Caponi] I do read most of the forums and of course, I’m very aware of the things that people have to say. Behind a lot of the negative comments, there are some good ideas and genuine criticisms, so I try to peel away the negativity and see those for what they are. And of course, there are some people who just enjoy being negative. Having written my share of vitriolic diatribes, I certainly see the appeal. Righteous anger just feels… good. But, the best thing to do with those people is to tune it out and not take it personally.

You learn to develop a thick skin pretty quickly when you’re in game development. You have to. No matter what you do, no matter how many people praise it, and matter how many people buy it and love it, somewhere, someone thinks that it sucks and they just can’t wait to tell you all about it. And thanks to the power of the internet, they can. Frequently. But, it can serve as a not-so-gentle reminder that no matter what you do, there’s always room for improvement.

[Zeleny] Well, that last question was a bit leading, wasn’t it? But I think I get your gist.

I used to dread the idea of posting on the forum, because I had heard (and seen) so many horror stories on various fan fora - not even just on games, but on all sorts of topics across the internet. But having had the chance to talk to folks on this list, and getting to recognize some of you as individuals, it’s been a lot more pleasing and rewarding than I had expected. A lot of you have provided valuable insights and perspectives on what you most loved about the game, and I really enjoy the discussions - even if I can’t talk about anything particularly juicy, yet.

As for the “nonconstructive comments”, I can entirely understand the anticipation and anxiety that a lot of Fallout fans have about us working with the franchise they’ve loved for a decade. Hell, even I occasionally feel anxiety about being able to live up to what I consider two classics in the medium - any creator does, to some degree. And considering how badly the loyal fans have been burned in the past, I can understand the bitter distrust of anyone else with it - you can only get screwed over so much before you get mean. Add that to the long, long wait since a game worth the name came out, and you have to expect a certain degree of frustration and nastiness.

So there are a lot of negative comments that I don’t really mind - in a lot of cases, I chalk them up to worried but well-intentioned people blowing off steam and venting frustration. And that’s no problem, because I know how they feel, and I don’t begrudge anyone the occasional complaint. Especially not when they’re intelligent and reasonable. I’d much rather hear a well-reasoned, harsh critique of my work from someone who respectfully disagrees with my choices than receive vapid fawning and bootlicking from someone who only likes my work because I’ve got a fancy logo next to my name. At least the critique can lead to better work in the future.

The only thing that bothers me - and this happens on all over the internet, not just here - is when someone goes way out of their way to find something “bad” about an otherwise fine piece, and uses that smaller imperfection to tar the whole piece as being terrible. That’s the sort of thing that can be frustrating to any creative type who’s pouring their heart into their work, and that just hurts the final piece. And we all want the final piece to be the best it can be - even when we don’t all agree on exactly how it should be.</blockquote>Link: Meet the Devs
 
unfortunately there is going to be far more negative responses as we have so little to go on, all we can do is bemoan the fact of what they have done in the past compared to what they are doing now and how little faith we have in them because they have shown us nothing as to what they are doing.

unfortunately the playerbase cannot engage in solid and informed critiquing untill we have some information to go on. once they release the priliminary information, thats when the real discussion can happen. untill then it will all be vitriolic flaming and bemoaning the obviousness that beth has never tried to tackle something like fallout.
 
From that article I can sum up the following:

- Dev's are listening to us.
- Devs think that some of us are ignorant trolls. (I might be.)
- Devs think that some of us are actually highly intelligent people that have been abused for countless years by different software companies. (True.)
- Devs rather have us bitching about Fallout then the Oblivion 'bootlickers'.
- Devs say our critique of Oblivion is hurtful.
- Devs want it to stop.
- Devs want food.
- Dev like fooood.

:P
 
I should have added that the comment was on page 23 in the This is... RPG/ADVENTURE section.

SO it look's like PC gamer is going to be showing us some fallout 3 related items in the next few month's, that will be good to see. What we will see is most likely going to be screen shot's or a short video I think, But a demo wouldn't go a miss ;).
 
Brother None said:
The only thing that bothers me - and this happens on all over the internet, not just here - is when someone goes way out of their way to find something “bad” about an otherwise fine piece, and uses that smaller imperfection to tar the whole piece as being terrible. That’s the sort of thing that can be frustrating to any creative type who’s pouring their heart into their work, and that just hurts the final piece. And we all want the final piece to be the best it can be - even when we don’t all agree on exactly how it should be.

I can understand that one with some of the concept art we've seen. I'm getting tired of some of the baseless complaints I hear in there. The "I look at it and don't FEEL Fallout" BS has got to stop, unless it gets more grounded and not this sissy FEEL crap.


Also, WRT PC Gamer, I doubt they'll have anything new. I'm sure it'll be leaked to the Internet before then, or they'll be writing an interpretation of the trailer that we'll have seen anyway.
 
i'm starting to think that devs are slowly slipping into a state of denial :) and self conviction .... not all mind you but some responses seem to be on the verge of : "yeah you guys are right - but we know better and you are gonna love it nonetheless"
 
Why do you ass clowns keep changing your usernames? Is that the latest fad? Kotario has a different name. Kharn has changed his name. Sheesh.

PC Gamer said:
I don't know if they are expecting elves, but they should give Bethesda a chance.
What, a chance to put elves in? Not bloody likely. I'd rather let them know we don't want any elves long before they get to making that decision, rather than hoping they're not that dumb and finding out after the fact that they are that dumb.

Teh Interview said:
How do you feel about the negative comments and predictions taken by some of the Fallout community? Has it affected your opinions in anyway? What do you feel towards such pointless and nonconstructive comments?
I like that bit on the end. It's a good thing none of our negative comments are pointless or nonconstructive. ;)
 
DarkUnderlord said:
Why do you ass clowns keep changing your usernames? Is that the latest fad? Kotario has a different name. Kharn has changed his name. Sheesh.
it's a typical & extremely annoying 'the order' thing...
 
SuAside said:
DarkUnderlord said:
Why do you ass clowns keep changing your usernames? Is that the latest fad? Kotario has a different name. Kharn has changed his name. Sheesh.
it's a typical & extremely annoying 'the order' thing...
It is? I thought it was because sometimes people get tired of nicknames, and sometimes they get a temp one (like mine now).
 
A bit later on in the mag there was a rant but some ware in it there was a short reference to the fallout IP and how if Interplay, did a fallout MMO how they would have to get the OK from Beth no more than 6 short lines and nothing new.
 
a certain PC games magazine were about to blow the lid on the high-tech third in the post-apocalypse RPG series.

Ah! I knew it!

which are sadly so far filled with Fallout fanboys telling Bethesda not to muck with their precious game world.

Hmmmmm? Since when PCGamer stopped giving devs hints on what they want the game to be?

If they do it why can't we do it?


I don't know if they are expecting elves, but they should give Bethesda a chance.

Nice, so he can give us all the advice he has, but we can't do the same thing to Bethesda. Does not compute.

Though the elves thing is funny :)
 
Ziltoid said:
It is? I thought it was because sometimes people get tired of nicknames, and sometimes they get a temp one (like mine now).
well, yeah, kinda, since 90% of the people doing it are Order members. viral spread and all...
 
SimpleMinded said:
Brother None said:
The only thing that bothers me - and this happens on all over the internet, not just here - is when someone goes way out of their way to find something “bad” about an otherwise fine piece, and uses that smaller imperfection to tar the whole piece as being terrible. That’s the sort of thing that can be frustrating to any creative type who’s pouring their heart into their work, and that just hurts the final piece. And we all want the final piece to be the best it can be - even when we don’t all agree on exactly how it should be.

I can understand that one with some of the concept art we've seen. I'm getting tired of some of the baseless complaints I hear in there. The "I look at it and don't FEEL Fallout" BS has got to stop, unless it gets more grounded and not this sissy FEEL crap.


Also, WRT PC Gamer, I doubt they'll have anything new. I'm sure it'll be leaked to the Internet before then, or they'll be writing an interpretation of the trailer that we'll have seen anyway.


Agreed... I was about to quote his comment before I noticed this. I'll be the first to admit I will at times poke fun or jab at the work in progress, but I will also admit I am completely optimistic about the project and look forward with anticipation and glee and what will be Fallout 3. I just want to fit in...*frowns*
 
We should settle this on Family Feud or on Jerry Springer...in the end its just a game, one of the best game ever made (in my opinion) but still just a game, so I wont lose sleep over all the stuff that is being said. the truth is , I'm just glad that some one took the flame and tries to do something with it, no matter the outcome something interesting will surely come out of this. Bottom line is Beth knew how nma was before starting this project and they should not act surprised or offended by what is being said here...if you cant stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen.
 
DarkLegacy said:
From that article I can sum up the following:

- Dev's are listening to us.
- Devs think that some of us are ignorant trolls. (I might be.)
- Devs think that some of us are actually highly intelligent people that have been abused for countless years by different software companies. (True.)
- Devs rather have us bitching about Fallout then the Oblivion 'bootlickers'.
- Devs say our critique of Oblivion is hurtful.
- Devs want it to stop.
- Devs want food.
- Dev like fooood.

:P

And that Ross Atherton of PC Gamer is absolutely clueless.
 
No matter what any gamer rag or any beth shoe lickin panty bunching dolt says... Beth better give us a Fallout 3 that wows, amazes, and makes us all fall to our knees weeping tears of joy. Or they will have lost me as a customer.
 
Is it a requirement to be retarded in order to be hired for a games magazine?

Honestly, I have yet to see a games magazine worthy of reading.

Even the last one I had some appreciation for lost ANY kind of respect from me when they called NWN "an almost perfect RPG".

So, yeah... fuck you PC Gamer. You suck.
 
I must say Ross seem's slightly clueless when it comes to fallout I have sent him a Email asking him some questions on fallout and I am waiting for a response but I doubt I will get one.
 
FeelTheRads said:
Is it a requirement to be retarded in order to be hired for a games magazine?

Honestly, I have yet to see a games magazine worthy of reading.

Even the last one I had some appreciation for lost ANY kind of respect from me when they called NWN "an almost perfect RPG".

So, yeah... fuck you PC Gamer. You suck.

what do u expect from people that gives scores from over 90% to games like wow and oblivion or gothic 3...

screw them all, thats one of the reason i dont read games mags for more then 7 years...
 
Back
Top