Pete Hines video interview

Polynikes said:
So does everyone else, the first few times through. After that we like to change stuff and improve the game. You don't like increasing replayability?

I do, but I don't consider it a priority.If the game itself is good and replayable enough (and considering its Fallout with its supposed many ways of completing it), I don't ever need to use mods.

Simply, if I had to choose between a better game itself from the devs without modding tools or a worse game but with those tools and a promise of getting it better sometime in a future, I will pick the first option.
 
Paul_cz said:
Simply, if I had to choose between a better game itself from the devs without modding tools or a worse game but with those tools and a promise of getting it better sometime in a future, I will pick the first option.

Do you mean "X+Y good now, X+Y good later" is better than "X good now, X+Z good later" for all values of X, Y and Z? Because if not, that's a pretty pointless statement.
 
But the advantage of people creating modded content is that even if the devs don't make the game that you exactly wanted, then hopefully modders will give you content that will get it closer to what you wanted.
 
Unillenium said:
Making an awesome game NOW isn't going to help sales that much in a couple of years when people are looking back and laughing about how people thought "Graphics and stuff back then" was cool and realistic.
I laugh about that already.

Anyway, it's a good thing some games are being developed with more than graphics and stuff in mind. That's what makes them great games.

You want graphics? Go see a movie or something. Geekheads.
 
Back
Top