Pull those pants up!

What's funny is that in my apartment complex I have a couple of white kids that listen to the tunes and dress the style, but who would otherwise be posterchildren for the Klan.

Like.... you do realize what culture you emulate, right?

Yo, my white brotha, what about that 40 acres and a mule,

(we could raise some good shit on that 40 acres and get the mule stoned.)... etc.
 
welsh said:
Interestingly enough, Malkyland does have this rather bizarre hillbilly/gangsta rap going on.

This is the problem with sub-cultures- they tend to blend and shape society in new, and often perverse ways.

Bob- I apologize. I am busting on you too hard. I still love ya, Yo's my nigga.

That said, I also believe in the free expression of topless bathing.

:rofl:

its all coo, just dont let it happen anymo aight.


on a more lighter note i think im convinced to leave this subjest alone.............but if i see one bit of some wanna be thugs crack im gonna whip out some free speech of my own.........
 
Ya know Malkavian...I remembered a conversation with you:
*
-Me: "Whats life like in Virginland?"
-Malkavian: "Ironically I just learned my state has the highest rate of teen pregnancy in the nation."
*

I guess they just need people to have sex less so their trying to repress those sort of desires.

Sincerely,
The Vault Dweller
 
Technically, there should be a moral code of what people wear. Girls who wear slutty things and guys who practically do the same thing promote a lot of sex, and that can be a bad thing.

But you know what? I totally dig chicks who wear sexy clothing and look good in it, so I'm 100% against this law.
 
bob_the_rambler said:
Typical American...your right.........spoon fed propaganda i was, but i left public schools for that very reason. To me its as simple as i dont want to see your underwear so i shouldnt have to.

I don't want to see red shirts so I shouldn't have to.

I don't want to see black hats so I shouldn't have to.

I don't want to see white socks so I shouldn't have to.

All of the above three sentences make as much sense.
 
Oh guess, please. Let off on poor Bob.

Let's be honest, these idiots running around with their pants down to their knees and boxers hanging out look stupid.

My wife and I saw this one guy dressed like that try to get out of his car. His three buddies were all dressed the same way, except when he tried to get up his boxers rolled down and he practically fell out of the car showing everyone on the New Jersey Turnpike his ass.

It was such a display of fashion stupidity we just died laughing.

But one should not be fined for stupid fashion.
 
Commissar Lauren said:
Thats why we invented the GULAG
Gulag? I don't understand. If someone breaks the law, why reward them by granting them food and a place to stay at government expense? There is only one suitable means of punishment for various transgressors and it is called AK-47.
 
Ratty said:
why reward them by granting them food and a place to stay at government expense?

Food? Comrade, you must be mistaken there is no food or lodging (other then the ground, or whatever the "visitors" can fashion from the frozen corpses of their fellow visitors). Or perhaps you are thinking of the Western Gulags, commonly found in places like Florida and Southern California. Those really arn't the same thing and should not be compared.
 
Like some places you go to have dress requirements. IE. "Must wear tshirt and pants to enter." Decency is a matter of atmosphere, private establishments have their own, but in public, the thoroughfare, it must be neutral. If you can wear bikini/bathing suit in public, why not allow underwear to show?
 
welsh said:
And that goes for breast feeders too, damn it. Because every time I see a woman breast feeding a woman, I think back to those good old days of suckling the nip, and damn it I want more!
I just want to point out this typo because I find it rather typical of Welsh.

Example: A thread on showing underwear (primarily male underwear) becomes another "Who's sexiest" Jr thread.

Just kidding Welsh.

Scantily clad (attractive) women = generally good.
 
Jabbapop said:
Like some places you go to have dress requirements. IE. "Must wear tshirt and pants to enter." Decency is a matter of atmosphere, private establishments have their own, but in public, the thoroughfare, it must be neutral. If you can wear bikini/bathing suit in public, why not allow underwear to show?
You mean, like, "No shirt, no shoes, no brain, no service"? I agree with it all, but especially with the "no brain" bit.
 
I'm just curious, but what type of swimwear do guys wear in your respective countries (or states)? In Australia, it is fashionable to wear big boxer shorts for swimming among teenagers. Although I am a teenager myself, I stick to my Speedos. Wearing pants in the sea seems unnecessary.
 
Commissar Lauren said:
Food? Comrade, you must be mistaken there is no food or lodging (other then the ground, or whatever the "visitors" can fashion from the frozen corpses of their fellow visitors). Or perhaps you are thinking of the Western Gulags, commonly found in places like Florida and Southern California. Those really arn't the same thing and should not be compared.
Speaking of Gulags...
 
I will just say it the silliest thing they could have ever thought of. A fine for people boxers showing , ok big fat people should cover up its not nice to see the pants underlapping what is not very nice to look at.
 
I guess i should explain my passion for not wanting to see man ass.

I work at a water park over the summer, and even though i get to see some REALLY hot chicks i also have the unfortunate displeasure of having to see WAY To much of people......(ugly fat hairy grandparents) in particular. Plus i have a hatred for punks, i was the "easy" target for assholes to pick on....so i am a little twisted when it comes to the "gangsta" mentality. I understand what true gangsters are like and it bothers me to see the growth of a subculture of "wannabe" Gangsters.

wooz........i dont really think i have ever personally attacked you. so lay off, or i might have to think of you as a asshole.
 
I know we have the right to hold to and lobby unpopular beliefs, but as we live in "society" there is a certain amount of conforming that needs to be done in order to have order and peace.

When low-rider jeans cause the Great Fashion Riots of 2007, I'll consider supporting fashion decency standards.
 
A few years back, in Ontario (don't know about the rest of Canada) some women lobbied that they had the right to go topless since men could.

They won and a law was passed that women can go topless in public (ie the streets, not businesses, restaurants etc).

Since they won that right and the law came inot effect, not a single woman (at least that I've ever seen has gone topless other than topless zoned beaches).

Which is good because the majority of the breasts out there are not nice.
 
Back
Top