S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Q&A

Morbus

Sonny, I Watched the Vault Bein' Built!
Rock, Paper, Shotgun has put up a few months old S.T.A.L.K.E.R. I.N.T.E.R.V.I.E.W. that has never seen the light of day because it was originally conducted "as research for a feature on S.T.A.L.K.E.R. commissioned by PC Gamer UK" and little of it was actually used. Still, it’s a very good and interesting read for those who (like me) enjoyed the game.<blockquote>RPS: How important was the book ‘Roadside Picnic’ and the film ‘Stalker’ to the development of your game?

Bolshakov: As important as an inspiration can be. We are old fans of Strugatsky brothers’ creations, however the game in no way repeats the book or the movie. We created our own game world, story, characters and so on, so considering S.T.A.L.K.E.R. an adaptation of the “Roadside Picnic” and “Stalker” movie would be wrong. (...)

RPS: Do you think that the existence of the Chernobyl has helped to create a more authentic game than you might otherwise have produced?

I think Chernobyl was very important to create the kind of environment, architecture and other details S.T.A.L.K.E.R. is particularly known-for. Ruins of old Soviet industrial complexes, blocks of flats, military and civil facilities, vehicles and so on are still plentiful around ex-USSR. However, those traces of old empire can hardly be felt as keen and striking as in the Chernobyl zone. To me it’s living history, as life has been still there for over twenty years now, ending back in USSR times. It was only after visiting Chernobyl that we were able to render the atmosphere of true post-apocalyptic Soviet world which we intended to deliver.</blockquote>Link: S.T.A.L.K.E.R. I.N.T.E.R.V.I.E.W.
 
anyone who has read Roadside Picnic will be able to enjoy the game much more btw.
 
SuAside said:
anyone who has read Roadside Picnic will be able to enjoy the game much more btw.

as for me, I'd say no. I love books by brothers Strugatski, especially this one. and this game has nothing to do with the book, just a few names like 'stalker', 'zone' and general idea of 'stalkering' as hunting for artefacts. but the idea behind the book is totally different.
they've took those mostly for the hype, but didn't even mention Strugatskis in the credits.
/offtopic
 
Excellent interview! I agree, the game doesn't have anything to do with Roadside Picnic. I've read the book, I've seen the movie. But they are saying that the initial title was Oblivion Lost and wasn't intended to be linked with the book of Strugatsky Brothers.
I love the writtings of Strugastky Brothers, they are pretty much insane, full of originality and under the pretext of a future, victorious soviet empire, they've criticised not only the system, but also what they've perceived to be wrong with the humanity at the time.
Two games inspired by earlier books of Strugatsky Brothers are coming next year: Hard to be a God and Dead Mountaineer's Cabin.
I love Eastern's Europe literature, but seems so hard to find in a good translation(unfortunately). Roadside Picnic it's a must read, if you can get your hands on a copy.
Then you'll understand why STALKER doesn't have anything to do with the book(except the names).
 
what?

how can you say it has nothing to do with it? Stalkers, artifacts, anomalies, scientists, whatnot.

sure, it's not the same background and the game is obviously more of a shoot 'em up compared to the book, but the inspiration is bloody obvious...

and yes, i DID read the damn book (twice).

(though i'll admit the book also makes you see how STALKER couldve been, but hey, take it as it comes...)
 
SuAside said:
anyone who has read Roadside Picnic will be able to enjoy the game much more btw.

I've had the Tarkovsky film lying about for ages without watching it. It any good? (kind of a non-question for Tarkovsky's films, but still)
 
I can't say that I love Strugatski books and I can't say that I love this game... Maybe I'm strange :| ?
I've had the Tarkovsky film lying about for ages without watching it.
Studying in VGIK for a couple of years, I'm never watching Tarkovsky films :roll:
 
Wasteland Stories said:
I can't say that I love Strugatski books and I can't say that I love this game... Maybe I'm strange :| ?
I've had the Tarkovsky film lying about for ages without watching it.
Studying in VGIK for a couple of years, I'm never watching Tarkovsky films :roll:

I named my older kid after Andrei Tarkovsky. Still I haven't seen two of his films, and one of those is Stalker.
 
Briosafreak said:
I named my older kid after Andrei Tarkovsky. Still I haven't seen two of his films, and one of those is Stalker.
For real? Andrei or André?

I have seen stalker (two months ago) and I didn't find it particularly interesting. But that's probably me, since I don't really like movies at all... :lol:
 
I watched Tarkovski's Solaris. It was a pretentious, drawn-out mess that had little to do with Stanislav Lem's creation.

Same can be said about Soderberg's Solaris, as well, because it doesn't appear that he read the book at all... he just imitated Tarkovski's skewed vision of Solaris and added George Clooney's naked butt.
 
No, I'm watching Tarkovsky films, but can't said that I'm big of him etc., like bigger part of other stundents. It's became disscussion about russian cinematographic, so "немножко по-офтопили" :)
I must say, that Tarkovsky has big talent, but as I say, I don't think that he was greatest director of USSR, but one of greatest, yeah, but I'm don't big fan of his films, include "Solaris" for example.
P.S. Ok, it was just "понт" :)
 
Brother None said:
I've had the Tarkovsky film lying about for ages without watching it. It any good? (kind of a non-question for Tarkovsky's films, but still)
Watch it already! I don't know what kind of sci-fi you prefer, but if you like the kind that doesn't flood you with technology, lasers, aliens etc, this is a good film. Though perhaps a little bit too slow in places.
 
Forgive me for being an ignorant Canadian at this point, but who in the nine is this director fellow, and it sounds like there's quite the fanaticism behind him.

Personally I like the cyberpunk view of the future myself, gritty and dark, but that's just me, I have no idea if 1) I could even understand these movies as I don't know a lick of Russian, and 2) just what kind of Sci-fi this would fall under, as fedaykin mentioned it isn't lasers and death robots and things like that so I (having been exposed mostly to either Hollywood rubbish where everything is teched to the nines and it's killing with several million rounds per second, or Japanese which tends to be much the same thing, although usually with bigger robots :) ) have only have a vague idea of what that would play out like.
 
I don't know what kind of sci-fi you prefer, but if you like the kind that doesn't flood you with technology, lasers, aliens etc, this is a good film.
I'm fan of Firefly/Serenity. It doesn't means that I dislike Tarkovsky Stalker, cause there's no guns, ships and Greg Edmonson theme, though.
 
Wasteland Stories said:
I'm fan of Firefly/Serenity. It doesn't means that I dislike Tarkovsky Stalker, cause there's no guns, ships and Greg Edmonson theme, though.
Yes, I understand it's not mutually exclusive for everybody. For me, it mostly is, though.

For instance, I've grown to dislike the newer star wars episodes, due to their shallow, almost comedic treatment of characters and the constant requirement to display "special" effects. Films like stalker, on the other hand, are more psychological, more character-centered, as I like to say.
 
For instance, I've grown to dislike the newer star wars episodes, due to their shallow, almost comedic treatment of characters and the constant requirement to display "special" effects. Films like stalker, on the other hand, are more psychological, more character-centered, as I like to say.
Oh, if you mean this - agreed. Sci-Fi like other genres, expect Porn, B (C) movies, not for fools.
 
Wasteland Stories said:
I must say, that Tarkovsky has big talent, but as I say, I don't think that he was greatest director of USSR, but one of greatest, yeah, but I'm don't big fan of his films, include "Solaris" for example.

I thought the consensus greatest would be Eisenstein becuase of his impact on the history of cinema?

Either way, if it's not Tarkovsky, then who?
 
Back
Top