Soviet union and EC

victor

Antediluvian as Feck
Orderite
What side do you think the Soviet union fought for before the Great war, or if it fought at all? China or the US? Was it one of the countries bombing with nukes? Maybe it had gone bankrupt because of a cold war with the States, just like in our world, but remained the Soviet union.

Same with the European Commonwealth. Did it have US support to attack the Middle east, or was the US against it, wishing they would one day control those oil fields for themselves?

This might be explained in the Bibles, I'm not sure, but it's more a matter of opinion.
 
Baboon said:
What side do you think the Soviet union fought for before the Great war, or if it fought at all? China or the US? Was it one of the countries bombing with nukes?

North Korea. For sure.

peanuts.gif
 
None of these were ever answered anywhere. Soviet Union is mentioned only once in all Fallout games, after all.
 
What do you think seems more likely? Siding with China, the US, or remaining neutral/helping the EC against the Middle east?


Also, I don't really get how there could be a "limited nuclear exchange" between Europe and the Middle east, where the latter doesn't really have any organized nuclear arsenals.
 
At that point in history I don't know, but it seems to me that now the (American)world wound not be in danger from them(the Russian, cause of USAs corruption in there), thought it doesn't mean that everybody else is in safe from the American dictatorship. :evil:

I not happy whit, what the world is now.
And will never apparently be.
 
Baboon said:
What do you think seems more likely? Siding with China, the US, or remaining neutral/helping the EC against the Middle east?


Also, I don't really get how there could be a "limited nuclear exchange" between Europe and the Middle east, where the latter doesn't really have any organized nuclear arsenals.

They don't now, but have you ever thought that they might have in the future of an alternate timeline?

As for the Soviet Union, both it and China were communist...
 
If you knew anything about 20th century history, you'd also know that the Soviet union and China were far from being friends. When the US are going to attack North Korea in a few years, do you really think China will help NK?

Communism doesn't necesarily mean they're friends.

I really don't see any Middle Eastern country (that is, excluding Iran and Pakistan, they're NOT the Middle east) being organized, wealthy or motivated enough to get a nuclear arsenal.
 
Yea, but I thought China always coveted the USSR's resources.

From what I remember in the 70's, Russia and Chinda both built up their troop allocations along the border, as China was concerned that it would become another Soviet republic, and Russia was worried about having a nuclear capable neighbor with billion person population to their south.

Fun stuff.
 
They even had skirmishes an micro-wars along their border. In case of a nuclear exchange between the US and the Ruskis, I wouldn't dismiss China as the Soviet Union's enemy. China was definitely very jealous of the Soviet Union.

The way I see it, and the way it's explained in the Bibles/Fallout Wiki, Fallout's world really diverged from ours around 1992 (I don't trust it to have diverged right after WW2), about the time the Soviet Union collapsed in our timeline (it probably survived there, albeit crippled beyond repair, much like our Russia today I'd think). Anything before that was roughly the same, at least politically. Cold war and everything. Probably not in detail, but you should definitely be able to draw certain parallels when it comes down to major events.

One thing that boggles me is the lack of rocketry in Fallout. The space race never occurred, hence the huge computers. But rocketry was established by the Germans during WW2, it could easily have developed into an ICBM arsenal without the existence of a space race. Weird. But if Fallout 3 is to be trusted, there were in fact space stations and satellites and such.

Considering the whole oil crisis thing in Fallout, something we may one day face, what happens after 2010 or so in Fallout could happen in our world, somewhat differently, but again, quite similar.
 
Baboon said:
I really don't see any Middle Eastern country (that is, excluding Iran and Pakistan, they're NOT the Middle east) being organized, wealthy or motivated enough to get a nuclear arsenal.

Pakistan was not very organized, didn't have a great technical staff, is very poor but has atomics . Israel is a good motivation for a nuclear program but I don't think they are going to do the same mistake as India who made a nuclear test a week after a crash with pakistans troops in Kashmir trying to impress the pakistan government. Now they have atomics. :!:
 
Baboon, there's an excellent alternate timeline thread
here.

As for Russia, yes it probably existed past 1992, but methinks it quickly faded from the main political stage, it no longer had the power to make a big difference on the world stage.

Another interesting thought would be that the dominant Communist country role the SU performed throughout the Cold War was then taken over by China, which started to control a lot of states as puppet states...
 
EyeMaster7 said:
Pakistan was not very organized, didn't have a great technical staff, is very poor but has atomics . Israel is a good motivation for a nuclear program

According to the timeline Israel would clearly be on the EC's side after the terrorists nuking Tel Aviv. Pakistan is NOT the Middle East, and doesn't have any oil that I know of, so would not be a direct target for the EC. Possibly they rivaled the EC for conquest of the Middle East however, so joined the conflict. Same with India and possibly China, although that would've sparked the Great war, so it's not so probable (perhaps China annexed most of Asia and even parts of Europe once the Resource wars were over though).

According to the timeline, China had puppet states/annexations (other than Tibet, Inner Mongolia and Taiwan I guess);

Fallout Wiki said:
June 2076: Power Armor prototype completed, resulting in the Power Armor players find in Fallout 1. This is the pinnacle of Power Armor technology before the Great War. Many of these units are sent to China, and they begin to carve a swath through the Chinese forces. The Chinese resources are strained to the breaking point, and the supply lines from the nations China has annexed begin to break down.
 
Europe was out of the power structure remeber, it had run out of resources, and russia would most likely side with china if it was still soviet russia. If you look at history they were allies, not trusting allies, but still allies (Like the constant visits from poloticians, also remeber the accedent that happens in 1991 (china calls it an accedent, even though the military knowingly killed like 40000 some people) who were protesting communism with a polical forign agent from russia was visiting.)
And if they were going to blast the united stats back to the stone age with nukes, they would need more help than a few middle eastern countries.
 
Baboon said:
If you knew anything about 20th century history, you'd also know that the Soviet union and China were far from being friends.

That's not right, Baboon. The Fallout timeline only follows our timeline until WW II, after that it diverges. We don't know if the Korean or Vietnam war ever happened, we know the USSR never collapsed, we don't know if 9/11 happened, we know that China probably continued to be communist rather than turning centrist.

It's a completely different universe. Current facts for the most part can be used for speculation, but they'll often diverge. I know you might like it more if it diverges at 1992, but it simply doesn't, it diverges at WW II. You said yourself the space race never occured, which is a pre-1992 divergence.

It is, in fact, not known who shot the first bombs and where. For all we know the president of the USA bombed his own country. Maybe Europe bombed the States. Maybe the SU. Maybe China. We don't know.

Baboon said:
Pakistan is NOT the Middle East, and doesn't have any oil that I know of, so would not be a direct target for the EC.

"The Middle East" is just a term and does not denote a big block of allies. Pakistan might very well turn against the EC, especially if the EC were allied to Israel and/or India. Pakistan being middle eastern or oil rich doesn't really matter for the political situation

But remember that during the end-talks in the UN everyone was pressuring the VS. It looks a lot like there weren't allied powerblocks facing each other, but rather it was a huge free-for-all. The EC had collapsed, but they still had nukes, same probably goes for the SU. The EC was the enemy of most the Middle East, so Israel probably sided with them, but where does that leave the US?
 
Kharn said:
That's not right, Baboon. The Fallout timeline only follows our timeline until WW II, after that it diverges. We know that China probably continued to be communist rather than turning centrist.

It's a completely different universe. Current facts for the most part can be used for speculation, but they'll often diverge. I know you might like it more if it diverges at 1992, but it simply doesn't, it diverges at WW II. You said yourself the space race never occured, which is a pre-1992 divergence.

China was said to be communist, and that's how it is in our world too. China is about as communist as the US, but it's still called communist. We're probably talking about two Chinas that are roughly identical here, even though the Fallout one might be slightly more powerful.

Of course the post-WW2 events are different, but the divergence doesn't have to be very significant. The Cold war was a result not only of WW2, but the historical events before that, such as colonialism. A cold war was pretty much inevitable after WW2. The question is who the major players were. Like: "Who defeated Hitler?"

The space race never occurring is not equal to the Cold war never occurring. It never occurring though was probably due to the Soviet Union not being one of the victors after WW2, maybe it was defeated by Hitler and then liberated itself after the Americans liberated all of Europe. The only probable consequence this had for the world of Fallout was the lack of miniaturization in computers. I still think 1992 is a major date.

Maybe Europe bombed the States.

Very unlikely that they started it. I think Europe ended up bombing each other and everyone else when the first planes were in the air.

Pakistan being oil rich doesn't really matter for the political situation

I think it does. The war was named the "Resource war" for a reason. Pakistan needed the oil as much as the EC did, so I'm not surprised if they joined in. Also because they didn't like the idea of having the EC as neighbors, in case they won (wars in the fallout world seem to be of conquest).


where does that leave the US?

This is thoroughly detailed in the Fallout canon. They started an extreme isolationist policy, focusing everything on their own continent (i.e taking over Mexican oilfields and later annexing Canada). They probably aided the EC indirectly in the Resource war , but barely, being self-sufficient thanks to the Alaskan oil reserves.

It wasn't until China invaded Alaska in 2066 that they woke up, resulting in the end of civilization 11 years later. China probably dropped the bombs first, as a sign of desperation, because their resources were stretched thin, and the US Army was winning the war in mainland China, due to the new power armor, something the Chinese couldn't truly rival.

The EC, USSR and Middle East were probably a mess at this point, unable to do anything but send their own planes and enjoy the holocaust.


The Great war resulted from a runaway energy crisis, something that doesn't strike me as neither odd nor unrealistic.
 
Why the hell would 1992 be a major date? it's included in the timeline only because it's mentioned in the Sierra Army Depot holodisk as a date of SAD's mission change, and there is no information about any other events that year. The SAD mission change is a rather minor event, so what makes you think it's the point of divergence?
 
Ausir said:
Why the hell would 1992 be a major date? it's included in the timeline only because it's mentioned in the Sierra Army Depot holodisk as a date of SAD's mission change, and there is no information about any other events that year. The SAD mission change is a rather minor event, so what makes you think it's the point of divergence?


Our Sierra Army depot and their Sierra Army depot had the same mission up until that time, and military base missions are usually somewhat of a reflection of current geopolitical events. Also,

Fallout Wiki said:
1942: Sierra Army Depot is created. Its mission is to store and maintain a defensive supply of military ordinance. This mission continued until 1991. (a real event, possibly before the Fallout universe diverged from ours)

But it's true that after studying the Bibles more, the Fallout universe probably diverged earlier. But then, you must define divergence. Political? Strategic? Technological? And so forth...

Finally, it's possible it didn't diverge too significantly, as all the meaningful events take place in the future.
 
Baboon said:
China was said to be communist, and that's how it is in our world too. China is about as communist as the US, but it's still called communist. We're probably talking about two Chinas that are roughly identical here, even though the Fallout one might be slightly more powerful.

Unlikely. China was the replacement enemy of the USSR in the 50's, which makes it very likely they resembled 50's USSR in a number of ways.

Baboon said:
Of course the post-WW2 events are different, but the divergence doesn't have to be very significant. The Cold war was a result not only of WW2, but the historical events before that, such as colonialism. A cold war was pretty much inevitable after WW2.

The Cold War started before WW2, that's hardly the issue.

Baboon said:
I still think 1992 is a major date.

For unclear reasons

Baboon said:
Very unlikely that they started it. I think Europe ended up bombing each other and everyone else when the first planes were in the air.

Yip. I said maybe

Baboon said:
I think it does. The war was named the "Resource war" for a reason. Pakistan needed the oil as much as the EC did, so I'm not surprised if they joined in. Also because they didn't like the idea of having the EC as neighbors, in case they won (wars in the fallout world seem to be of conquest).

That was exactly my point. Pakistan not being oil-rich or "Middle East" doesn't mean it wouldn't have important ties with oil-rich Middle Eastern countries, not to mention that like any country it also needs oil. Reason enough to get stuck into the bosh.

Baboon said:
This is thoroughly detailed in the Fallout canon. They started an extreme isolationist policy, focusing everything on their own continent (i.e taking over Mexican oilfields and later annexing Canada). They probably aided the EC indirectly in the Resource war , but barely, being self-sufficient thanks to the Alaskan oil reserves.

Not true. The US had tapped the final below-sea oil reserve, cutting off China who would actually have beaten them if the US hadn't sabotaged them. That was what was keeping them up and pissing the rest of the world off.
 
Ah yes, any sources on that? Explanations? In decent English?
Or any reasons at all to post this here?
 
Back
Top