Well Bradylama- One could be anti-intellectual, but wouldn't that essentially mean that you're pro-stupidity?
And if you're pro-stupid wouldn't that make you both-
(1) Easily manipulated by folks that are more developed intellect or have a deeper and more sophisticated understanding of ethics.
(2) Do little for you except feed your ignorance, your moral and intellectual frustrations, your atomized sense of existance and thus leading to angst, confusion and occassional outbursts of utter stupidly, kind of like APTYP?
Actually CCR, I apprecaite you putting up this post. I have seen some graphic novels and have talked to a few people about this. In fact I've requested a copy of the graphic novel for Sin City through my library.
So, ok, I am willing to give graphic novels the benefit of the doubt.
But do they give you more than a good novel? Are they little more than movies in book form?
Or are they just easy entertainment for those unwilling to more intellectually challenge themselves?
When I was a kid I had the old Classic Comics- when you could see Moby Dick, Three Muskateers, Jeckell & Hyde, A Tale of Two Cities, in a comic form. That was cool if you're eight years old, but as an adult shouldn't you read those books?
The relevant question is - Are graphic novels are a new form of literature or art?
If so what kind of art?