The absolute rock-hard of gaming experiences

I've played the HHGTG game...and completed it. Blergh.

I Want To Be The Guy a.k.a. Rick Dangerous 3. Rick Dangerous was a platformer that used hidden traps to try to kill the player. The only way to beat the game was to memorize where the traps were. Though nowhere near as nasty as IWBTG, it's hard to forget a game that cruel. No save-states. 3 lives. Limited resources. Good luck. (I actually finished Rick Dangerous 2 once.) Made by the same people that made Tomb Raider.
 
Oldies: I played all of these before I was 10, so they were difficult.
Marathon was hard, but then again, I was like 5 years old. :wink:

Played Half Life after, also hard when I was very young.

Civ2 was hard. When I was 6 I realized cheats and won finally. :lol:

Deus Ex: I was a little older but that first level always got me.

Unreal Tournament: I beat it on easy but the last fight against Xan was a nightmare.

Some Newer stuff (for me at least):
STALKER: especially on the harder settings and with Oblivion Lost.

SS2: I'm still playing it but some parts are difficult and require some managment skills.

COD4 on harder settings.

Some more I can't think of...
 
Warhammer Shadow Of The Horned Rat, the game was really hard, already in second mission enemy had 2-1 ratio of units and those units were equal in strength to yours. You could only replace casualties in towns that were sometimes between several missions and reinforcements were sparse so if some regiment lost more than half of its men you could not reinforce it to full strength.
 
Agree with Contra 3

maximaz said:
DMC 3
was super hard
The original was harder, what was nasty about DMC3 was that the difficulty curve went vertically up a good ways on stage 3 (Cerberus) but after that it had a fairly slow but steady incline, unlike the original game which had a constant but fairly steep incline.

I'd agree with Unkillable Cat on Battletoads, though that's mostly because of the speeder sections.

Wooz said:
The first TMNT game for the NES comes to mind.
Ya know, I used to think so but I just recently went back and played it and it wasn't as hard as I remembered.

Mario 2 (Mario: Lost Levels)
Mike Tyson's Punch Out (though I should probably emulate it and see if using a controller that isn't beat up makes it reasonable, my NES has taken it's blows)
Total Carnage
Smash TV
Probably one of the Mega Man games (I'm too good at them these days, 7's Wily has always been a bitch)

PC games are more of a toss up, strategy games all depend on how good you are at strategy so they really vary from person to person but I'd put a Civ game up there.
 
marko2te said:
Warhammer Shadow Of The Horned Rat, the game was really hard, already in second mission enemy had 2-1 ratio of units and those units were equal in strength to yours. You could only replace casualties in towns that were sometimes between several missions and reinforcements were sparse so if some regiment lost more than half of its men you could not reinforce it to full strength.

o god i played that game, i think it may have been impossible to complete without cheats you know... i used to get near the orc tunnles and get whammed by squigs... cruel cruel inventions of a beast they are. you just had to sit back and watch them jump all through your ranks slowly squashing everyone to death... :(
 
Metzer said:
marko2te said:
Warhammer Shadow Of The Horned Rat, the game was really hard, already in second mission enemy had 2-1 ratio of units and those units were equal in strength to yours. You could only replace casualties in towns that were sometimes between several missions and reinforcements were sparse so if some regiment lost more than half of its men you could not reinforce it to full strength.

o god i played that game, i think it may have been impossible to complete without cheats you know... i used to get near the orc tunnles and get whammed by squigs... cruel cruel inventions of a beast they are. you just had to sit back and watch them jump all through your ranks slowly squashing everyone to death... :(



The main problem with that game was that major factor for winning was luck. I remember one of the first missions when you had to rescue a group of dwarfs who was surrounded. On my first play dwarfs were routed few seconds after the mission started and started running like a bunch of schoolgirls who just saw a really big spider, I won that mission but with heavy casualties which meant pressing the load save option. On my second play dwarfs were also routed but not before the slaughtered two units of ork boys and unit of black orcs which made my life a whole easier. In most strategy games luck is a factor but a minor one, this was the biggest problem with this game no matter how good tactician you are if you dont have luck you end poorly.
 
keyser Soeze said:
Soldiers; Heroes of World War II

Don't remember it being very hard but it was some time ago i played it now. Very fun game tho!

Played it even in MP with some mods that made the game mutch better, at least if you like realism.

It's a very entertaining game, but some of the missions, especially the first Russian mission made me want to pull my teeth out. On the higher difficulties atleast.

As long as I get my arse kicked by the "AI" I would not even dare to think about MP. ;)
 
Back
Top