The American Royalist Party

Really? If you'll be passing through Zagreb, let me know. I might summon the strength to get off my ass and meet you.
 
A monarchist party suggests both the notion of a king and an aristocracy.

Now while that might not sell in the US, there is nothing to say that a person who is a naturally born citizen in the US and could inherit royalty in another, couldn't run for president in the US- the problem comes down to citizenship.

But merely getting rid of labels like King, Queen, Count, Duke or Duchess, doesn't mean we don't have or couldn't have a group of insular elites who essentially run a country either. For example, Bush sr. Bush Jr. Jeb or even the Kennedy's.
 
That is why we should instaure good-ole' fashioned methods to get rid of oligarchy.

The guillotine, of course.
 
Wooz said:
That is why we should instaure good-ole' fashioned methods to get rid of oligarchy.

The guillotine, of course.
Click to expand...
That would be overly violent and uncivilized. I am appalled by your barbaric manner.

Firing squad would be much better.
 
The guillotine is one of the most humane methods of ending someone's life. Most gruesome too, sure, but also most humane.

Besides, guillotines and royalty just work well together for some reason. :look:
 
Morte's opinion on this matter is hereby ignored, since he is obviously biased towards guillotines.
 
And Ratty's opinion is hereby ignored becuase he obviously sucks donkey balls. And he's ugly.
 
Call me ugly again and I'll carve you up so bad you'll be begging for a guillotine, shithead.
 
Right, uhm, Ratty, there's a certain boundary betwee, ahm, funny and insulting and, hmmm, you just crossed it. I think I'm clear, hmmm, ok
 
Kharn said:
Right, uhm, Ratty, there's a certain boundary betwee, ahm, funny and insulting and, hmmm, you just crossed it. I think I'm clear, hmmm, ok
Click to expand...

What did the rat bastard say? I'm ignoring him, remember?
 
Firing squad- every once and awhile they don't kill the guy and the master of the squad has to shoot him in the head. Who the hell wants to take a risk with guys who can't shoot straight.

That said, supposedly something like 1 in 6 individuals were still "conscious" after being guillotined. THeir heads fell in the basket only to look up at the bloody blade that had severed them from their bodies. The eyes would often keep blinking for a few moments until blood loss and oxygen killed the brain. Twisted, but nothing I'd like to experience.
 
The infamous coup de grâce. Though, that's not because of poor aim on the part of the firing squad, freak chances can keep people alive. Though it might be quite different with modern rifles.

I'm suspect on the "consciousness after beheading" thing. It's not as if there has ever been testing on this matter. Besides, who to say that these individuals would be truely "conscious" and not completely lost in shock, before they die. Not that there is a way to really tell.

Just remember to leave the nobility alone, who cares what is done with the royalty.
 
welsh said:
Firing squad- every once and awhile they don't kill the guy and the master of the squad has to shoot him in the head.
Click to expand...
That could be solved with the use of Bazookass instead of rifles.
That said, supposedly something like 1 in 6 individuals were still "conscious" after being guillotined.
Click to expand...
And that could be solved by dropping a solid block on the head. *smoosh* Then they'd be dead :twisted:
 
You know what the coolest method of execution ever would be? Infecting the subject with HIV, then leaving him to die in his prison cell. Wouldn't that rock?

Kharn said:
Right, uhm, Ratty, there's a certain boundary betwee, ahm, funny and insulting and, hmmm, you just crossed it. I think I'm clear, hmmm, ok
Click to expand...
He called me ugly!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top