The female side of George Bush (warning- it may shock you)

Discussion in 'General Discussion Forum' started by welsh, Feb 19, 2004.

  1. welsh

    welsh Junkmaster

    Apr 5, 2003
  2. Snake

    Snake Vault Dweller

    725
    Jul 6, 2003
    This is his monkey like side.

     
  3. Eisenhower

    Eisenhower First time out of the vault

    42
    Feb 12, 2004
    Bush seems to be 0wned!!! :)
    [/list]
     
  4. Johns Volition

    Johns Volition Still Mildly Glowing

    209
    Dec 25, 2003
    I doubt that lady bush would have such a nice body...
     
  5. Eisenhower

    Eisenhower First time out of the vault

    42
    Feb 12, 2004
    its a shemale dude! :P
     
  6. c0ldst33ltrs4u

    c0ldst33ltrs4u Vault Dweller

    702
    Jan 12, 2004
  7. Eisenhower

    Eisenhower First time out of the vault

    42
    Feb 12, 2004
    [/list]
     
  8. Liquid

    Liquid First time out of the vault

    51
    Dec 2, 2003
    dude, that is really horrible.
    i mean he is the most made fun of US president.

    Not that I mind :)
     
  9. calculon000

    calculon000 Sonny, I Watched the Vault Bein' Built!

    Feb 10, 2004
    That's because he's an idiot.
     
  10. Paladin Solo

    Paladin Solo So Old I'm Losing Radiation Signs

    Nov 7, 2003
    No, it's because he's not a kiss-ass.
     
  11. Brother None

    Brother None This ghoul has seen it all
    Admin Orderite Board Cop oTO

    Apr 3, 2003
    Yeaj! :roll:

    Roosevelt, that was "not a kiss-ass". Did he get ridiculed (aside from being called "the red man in the white house")? Not much.

    Bush gets ridiculed mostly for stating the facts wrong or using wrong English.

    It's like our old premier, Wim Kok. Once, during a conference with Chirac (of France), after Chirac explained his position, Kokkie said "La meme pour moi" to state he agreed. However, that statement is normaqlly made when you want to order the same as your companion in a restaurant. Ooops
     
  12. Liquid

    Liquid First time out of the vault

    51
    Dec 2, 2003


    That's mostly right. I saw a webpage that made me laugh to tears :). It was about a dialogue between Condie Rice and g.w.bush.

    I hafta give a link.


    It was here somwhere...
     
  13. calculon000

    calculon000 Sonny, I Watched the Vault Bein' Built!

    Feb 10, 2004
  14. Ugly John

    Ugly John So Old I'm Losing Radiation Signs

    Apr 3, 2003
    Please someone explai to dubwa that it'S nucLEar not nuCUlar
     
  15. Big T

    Big T Sonny, I Watched the Vault Bein' Built!

    Jan 23, 2004
    So many people make that same mistake
     
  16. night monk3y

    night monk3y First time out of the vault

    19
    Dec 30, 2003
    True, but they're not the leader of the world's strongest nation :roll:
     
  17. calculon000

    calculon000 Sonny, I Watched the Vault Bein' Built!

    Feb 10, 2004
    Is it just me, or do you kina want the *smartest* possible person running a country?
     
  18. John Uskglass

    John Uskglass Venerable Relic of the Wastes

    Aug 29, 2003
    No, he is the leader of the strongest nation in history. Dumbass.

    No, you want the person the people (or, arguably in this case, the system that works for the people) choose. I dont care if you are the most intellgent, best suited person for the job in history and could rule forever. The purpose of government is to work for the people by mandate, and if the people are not satisfied, then the government serves no purpose.
     
  19. calculon000

    calculon000 Sonny, I Watched the Vault Bein' Built!

    Feb 10, 2004
    I think you mis-interpreted him, he was referring to what Big_T_UK said. night monk3y was simply stating that most of the people who mis-pronounce the word Nuclear are not the leader of the USA.

    EDIT: and yes, I suppose leadership is not the same thing as intelligence, but Bush? Lets get someone who doesn't shit in the face of the god-damned UN by invading a country that didn't even have WMD. But thats another debate.
     
  20. welsh

    welsh Junkmaster

    Apr 5, 2003
    Indeed, but that assumes
    (1) the social contract
    (2) that the social contract is actually working.

    I actually am rather suspicious of the first as more than a philosophical idea. Perhaps through the development of democratic norms, but even that I doubt.

    Which raises the question of funding and special interest. What matters more, the popular will or the funding and special interest support that can channel popular support? And if there is a clash between the two (popular will vs special interest), which will prevail and why?