Lumpy said:Another dumb thing was having forced combat. If they allowed the player to complete 70% of the game with diplomacy, why should they have forced combat in the other 30%, making diplomacy nothing more than a cosmetic option, since you have to have combat skills anyway.
Lumpy said:And in Oblivion, you could also let yourself be killed and allow the Evil God to rule the world. OMG multiple endings.Angrim said:I still have to kill him.
No you don't. You can join him, too
Bullseye said:And last but not least:
Why would you go to a forum where people who like Fallout talk about the positive things of fallout, and come with this negative nonsense, of course we know that the game has flaws, every game does. But the thing you should do is look past those flaws and find that Fallout is a hack of a game!
My point is, you can't just say "Yeah, the game has flaws", but not care about them, because they're never going to get fixed. And discussing those flaws should be very useful for Fallout-inspired games such as AoD or FMF.Lumpy said:In my opinion, Fallout was not as perfect as some of the fans portray it today. Sure, it beats most RPGs today by far, but nevertheless, it could be improved at certain points.
Bullseye said:Why would you go to a forum where people who like Fallout talk about the positive things of fallout, and come with this negative nonsense, of course we know that the game has flaws, every game does. But the thing you should do is look past those flaws and find that Fallout is a hack of a game!