John Uskglass said:Can't say I knew that. Have not read any Turgenev.
See, Turgenev is what I'd call overrated...
John Uskglass said:Can't say I knew that. Have not read any Turgenev.
John Uskglass said:Dude. No.
The worst we could be accused of is Anglophilia in terms of literature. A LOT of people read Russian and some German literature, however.
John Uskglass said:o rly?
John Uskglass said:Can't say I knew that. Have not read any Turgenev.
John Uskglass said:Humph. Interesting. I can see how someone could edit Tolstoy pretty easily to make it seem almost pro-communist (in Anna Karenina especially, as there are real honest to goddness Communist in it).
John Uskglass said:I am curious Kharn, what is your opinion of Bulgakov? Just finished Master and Margarita.
Ignorance and stupidity are the natural state of humanity, and America lets people be what they want to be.THEN EXPLAIN THE LIST! THE HORRIBLE LIST!!!!
In case you are not noticing, I *am* letting you.rly. Remember, I study Russian Literature (as one of my subjects), so allow me to be all snobby here.
Cool. Don't expect me to get at it for a while, I'm only 250 pages into Anna Karenina, and I'm trying to balance it with half a dozen other books at the same time.You should read Fathers and Sons at least. It's a great piece of prose. DDD might be right in that Turgenev is overrated when it comes to a lot of the rest of his works, but Fathers and Sons is one of the greatest books of all time.
Yes. He reminds me of a more serious, less funny, less crazy G.K. Chesterton in some respects, at least in terms of the political perspective of his novels.Yes. Whereas Dostoevskij, especially in Diary of a Writer, is pretty clearly anti-anarchist/communist/socialist.
It's genius. I wish I knew Russian just so I could read it in the original, but Pevear and Volokhonsky will have to suffice for now (and they do, well).Bulgakov? I have to admit I haven't read as much of his works as I'd like, but I like what I've read. Haven't read Master and Margarite, it's near the top of my to-read list.
Seen it. And I performed Heart of a Dog when I was 12. I was the doctor.Heart of a Dog is probably one of the most brilliant "pseudo-psycho" books I've ever read. It's a wonderful coloured analogy from beginning to end. To switch topics a little bit, the 1988 movie of Vladimir Bortko* is probably one of the greatest underrated bits of Russian cinema in existence.
I don't know much about Soviet literature, and frankly Gorky and friends do not appeal to me. I'm quite a fan of Bulgakov because he was essentially an anticommunist and a deeply closeted conservative on some level.I'm not a big fan of Soviet literature, though. Not relatively to older literature, anyway. For instance, I just devoured and loved Lermontov's A Hero of Our Team. 's great.
IIRC he does not have that many good English translations. Tarkovsky's movie is a must though.Montez said:What are your opinions of Solzhenitsyn? I've been meaning to read some books by him for years but have always managed to put it off.
John Uskglass said:Ignorance and stupidity are the natural state of humanity, and America lets people be what they want to be.
John Uskglass said:In case you are not noticing, I *am* letting you.
John Uskglass said:into Anna Karenina, and I'm trying to balance it with half a dozen other books at the same time.
John Uskglass said:Yes. He reminds me of a more serious, less funny, less crazy G.K. Chesterton in some respects, at least in terms of the political perspective of his novels.
John Uskglass said:It's genius. I wish I knew Russian just so I could read it in the original, but Pevear and Volokhonsky will have to suffice for now (and they do, well).
It's also very literate: there's a lot of refreances to Goethe (some that I got on my own) and a heck of a lot to Pushkin (none of which I got).
And it's funny. And scary. And it influence the best song the Stones ever did.
John Uskglass said:Seen it. And I performed Heart of a Dog when I was 12. I was the doctor.
John Uskglass said:I don't know much about Soviet literature, and frankly Gorky and friends do not appeal to me. I'm quite a fan of Bulgakov because he was essentially an anticommunist and a deeply closeted conservative on some level.
John Uskglass said:EDIT: Also read WE some years ago.
John Uskglass said:Also, I should add, Master and Margarita has vodka drinking, massive, talking black cats that decapitate people, so it's one of the best books I have ever read.
Montez said:What are your opinions of Solzhenitsyn? I've been meaning to read some books by him for years but have always managed to put it off.
Damn right.The USA, allowing people to be dumb.
Awh, I love you my little Russophile creame cake.Awww, I didn't know you cared.
I have a very good memory.Unless you have a phenomenal memory, it doesn't work.
Everyone I like.I bet everyone reminds you of Chesterton somehow.
I will read it.
Sympathy for the Devil. Great song. The first few lines are from Master and Margarita, IIRC.Which song?
No, we had a Ukranian do that.Yeah, uh-huh, sure, the dog. I bet you were the dog. Before he transformed.
I have a hard time reading Gorky, Ayn Rand, D.H. Lawergay or anyone else in that vein because I think at a base level their books do no good.Reading or not reading people on their political sentiments is lighty silly.
Eugene Zamyatin's WE.Read what now? "We"? Is that some kind of glossy?
CCR said:No, we had a Ukranian do that.
Kharn said:I love it when Russians write in the same way as they talk when drunk. Gogol''s "The Nose" is a prime example of this.
Kharn said:John Uskglass said:Dude. No.
The worst we could be accused of is Anglophilia in terms of literature. A LOT of people read Russian and some German literature, however.
THEN EXPLAIN THE LIST! THE HORRIBLE LIST!!!!