The statue of liberty and its symbolic use in movies

ConstinpatedCraprunner said:
Lach Walesa (sp?) would disagree with you there. Poland is capitalist, and it's human rights record (even post-wall) is not that of America.

Poland's government is pseudo-capitalist, I'm not. And Lech Walesa wasn't capitalist-driven, either. He was a union worker, hence the irony: a communist government overthrown by union workers. Heh.

In any case, what makes you say I don't have a moral base to criticize the current American government? I'm supposed to look at it as something completely alien, incomprehensible and out of my reach, for being a (the offense) Non-American?

Human rights record? Does Poland have any current facilities such as Gunatanamo Bay? Is it legal in Poland for police to search your house and jail you, without trial, under the pretext of being a terrorist? Legal for Police to storm schools and shove guns up kids' mouths?

bushPoliceState.jpg


BTW the miranda rights went away with the passing of the patriot act, IIRC. Remaining silent falls under collaboration, punished with up to 5 years of prison.


Anyways, again not my point.

Yet you agree, that civil rights have been going downhill, and accept it willingly, justifying it a supposed foaming 300 million army of "Islamofascists" crawling all over the globe to nuke NYC.
For how long will the civil rights be going downhill? As long as "The 300 Million enemy" is destroyed?. Man, that's the oldest trick in the book to strip a nation from its civil rights. "Danger danger we're under attack! Obey the government, obey the cops, don't think too much, and don't criticize the government in a crisis situation".

Remember 1984 and the chapter about the state of perpetual war, made up to terrorize the population and have a better control over it?

That's what I meant with the "goons" thing.
 
CCR (on prisoner treatment) said:
Now, America certainly has a history of this at diffirent points, but generally treatment of prisoners/activists is better then ... Europe.
Which parts of Europe?
Which parts of America?
When?
If you include how black prisoners (prior to the equality movement) used to be treated in (particularly) southern prisons it puts a bit of a slant on the matter.
I would also say that (nowadays) prisoner treatment in British prisons is much better than in America. So much so that we are accused (correctly) of pampering our prisoners in many cases.
CCR (on the BNP) said:
Yep, I am, I'll admit. But I still find it fairly scary, as you probably do.
Indeed, particularly as support for them seems to be growing more in the North of England (where I live) and Scotland (I think).
CCR (on US policy) said:
But, IMHO, we are still better then any nation in Europe (save maybe the Dutch, arguably) in terms of freedom and some other aspects, or having a milirty that is quite civilized and effective at avoiding unnessicary casualties
I would dispute this as well. Aside from the matter of gun ownership (which many Americans often seem to believe is vitally important to freedom (No, don't anyone get into this, we've had more than enough gun threads)), I'd say that we Brits have it better (particularly after the patriot act, which, in my view, surrenders an amazingly large amount of your freedom).
The US army does not seem to be that bothered about casualties (except their own). Example: You do not bomb the fuck out of wedding parties 'cos you think they might be enemy safe houses. (remember: "Bad people have parties too")
Wooz (on patriot act) said:
BTW the miranda rights went away with the passing of the patriot act, IIRC. Remaining silent falls under collaboration, punished with up to 5 years of prison.
Fuck, that would scare the fuck out of me if I were an American.

Bollocks!
Once again, my post ends up sounding anti-American, despite that not being the intended (or desired) tone of it.
 
CCR said:
But, IMHO, we are still better then any nation in Europe (save maybe the Dutch, arguably) in terms of freedom and some other aspects, or having a milirty that is quite civilized and effective at avoiding unnessicary casualties
I just realized that after talking to a friend of mine who's home now on leave after serving over a year in Iraq as a special lieutenant, this is a totally false claim. He and his buddies didn't give a fuck who or what they were shooting at. He was invovled with several shady dealings that went on. He and several other of his pals over there also came up with a grand scheme to make what could be millions from the future Iraqi oil-fueled economy after only investing a few hundred US. Their investments already has paid off 50 times itself and is expected to pay off itself 100 times THAT in five years once the economy assumedly stabalizes itself there when mass oil production can resume. On top of that, these investments' legality is highly questionable.

Do YOU personally know anybody who's served over there?
 
I just realized that after talking to a friend of mine who's home now on leave after serving over a year in Iraq as a special lieutenant, this is a totally false claim. He and his buddies didn't give a fuck who or what they were shooting at. He was invovled with several shady dealings that went on. He and several other of his pals over there also came up with a grand scheme to make what could be millions from the future Iraqi oil-fueled economy after only investing a few hundred US. Their investments already has paid off 50 times itself and is expected to pay off itself 100 times THAT in five years once the economy assumedly stabalizes itself there when mass oil production can resume. On top of that, these investments' legality is highly questionable.
O rly?

I don't really know (or, for that matter, care) about personal situations, despite how much this stinks of corruption. The American military HAS spent millions to prevent civilian casualties in Iraq and Afghanstan, and we have been better here then the Euros in the Balkans, not to mention the nastiness of a quarter of a century ago.

What exactly was the nature of the investment?


Which parts of Europe?
Which parts of America?
When?
If you include how black prisoners (prior to the equality movement) used to be treated in (particularly) southern prisons it puts a bit of a slant on the matter.
I would also say that (nowadays) prisoner treatment in British prisons is much better than in America. So much so that we are accused (correctly) of pampering our prisoners in many cases.
I was thinking of how Europe deals with student riots. In retrospect it's not really fair, as America does'nt have a similar situation with riots, and when it does (Seattle), it gets involved because a some insane group of anarchists think that destroying a Starbucks will help the Anarchist cause.

Indeed, particularly as support for them seems to be growing more in the North of England (where I live) and Scotland (I think).
Where in the north? I spent a year in Birmingham with my grandmother.


I would dispute this as well. Aside from the matter of gun ownership (which many Americans often seem to believe is vitally important to freedom (No, don't anyone get into this, we've had more than enough gun threads)), I'd say that we Brits have it better (particularly after the patriot act, which, in my view, surrenders an amazingly large amount of your freedom).

No, not really. You don't have anything as strong as a bill of rights, and no cult of the constitution like we have here.

Patriot act is temporary, again.

Fuck, that would scare the fuck out of me if I were an American.

Again, it's in extreme situations. Wooz made it sounds like we've just gotten rid of it.

In any case, what makes you say I don't have a moral base to criticize the current American government? I'm supposed to look at it as something completely alien, incomprehensible and out of my reach, for being a (the offense) Non-American?

No one sense the Nazis has wanted to get rid of the Polish way of life. Last time I checked Poland still does'nt like Germany (and many fear that the EU is just another German attempt to grab Polish land, irony once you consider what happened to the German population in modern Poland).

Human rights record? Does Poland have any current facilities such as Gunatanamo Bay? Is it legal in Poland for police to search your house and jail you, without trial, under the pretext of being a terrorist? Legal for Police to storm schools and shove guns up kids' mouths?

I went to an "urban" school for two years. Some bad shit happened there (a girl in my own grade threw away her living babie into a garbage can, a shotgun was found), but nothing like this. In a country of 280 million people and racial tension, this shit happens.

Also, what does that have to do with the patriot act, GWB or anything about America's civil liberties? The police here where punsihed.


Yet you agree, that civil rights have been going downhill, and accept it willingly, justifying it a supposed foaming 300 million army of "Islamofascists" crawling all over the globe to nuke NYC.
You make me sound like a Nazi. I'm not. These people DO want to kill us. Do you think 9/11 was just some bizzare mistake, or a Mossaud conspiricy? We have the obligation to do everything we can to stop the possible death of millions. To me it is no longer even a question, and if you had family or friends in Chicago, New York or Los Angeles, you'd probably feel the same way.

Remember 1984 and the chapter about the state of perpetual war, made up to terrorize the population and have a better control over it?
Ocenia has always been at war with Eurasia!

Another red herring. This is a real, actual threat, that has already claimed some 3,000 lives, and we did not start this war.....unless you think that Saudi Arabia is holy land, do you?
 
CCR said:
Where in the north? I spent a year in Birmingham with my grandmother.
Leeds, the heart of Yorkshire.
Your grannie's a Brummie?
Bwahaha!

Again, it's in extreme situations. Wooz made it sounds like we've just gotten rid of it.
You pretty much have. Really all the powers that be have to do is say "Uh...He's a terrorist!" and they can do what they like.
Reminds me of another period of US history.
You don't have anything as strong as a bill of rights, and no cult of the constitution like we have here.
Not in one document no. I think we're well enough protected if the gov't goes nasty (besides which, our government does not have the level of power over us that yours does). And your "cult of constitution" really is what you have. Worship of a 200+ year old document is daft. Much of it still applies, but other bits (*cough*gun ownership*cough*) don't apply as they did when it was drafted.
 
I don't want to debate who started this war.

I'm pointing out that If you people don't defend your damn civil rights NOW, nobody will defend or take them back in your place. It's all there is to it, really.

And I could care less about having a supposed national-historical moral base.
 
ConstinpatedCraprunner said:
Patriot act is temporary, again.

Kind of like how income tax was temporary? If history has shown us anything it is that it's a lot easier to give up rights and freedoms than to get them back.
 
Kind of like how income tax was temporary? If history has shown us anything it is that it's a lot easier to give up rights and freedoms than to get them back.

Yep. That's certainly true. But there's already a substantial amount of people against it, and it's growing, and it will continue to grow as the War on Terror starts to boil down.

I'm pointing out that If you people don't defend your damn civil rights NOW, nobody will defend or take them back in your place. It's all there is to it, really.
Well, I'd consider living without fear of nuclear annihalation a civil right, would'nt you? Again, you just can't understand the situation. And again, we are defending it. Especially if John Kerry get's elected, it's unlikely that there will be a Patriot Act II: This Time Its Personal, and even if there is a massive attack, and GWB is till president, it's not going to continue.

Again, this is not some continuous, systematic attack on America's civil rights. The Patriot Act was passed after the most violent day in American history sense Antitem due to a group of fanatics that want nothing less then total world domination.

And I could care less about having a supposed national-historical moral base.
Ow, on the contrary, it is. You're acting like Mr. Innocent, and you still think that America's the one oversimplyfying things. Truth is, no conflict is without some kind of relitivism. Even WW2. Remember how evil the Sovites where, or the concentration camps of Japanese citizens, or Belgium's abuse of the Congo?

Yet it was still a justified conflict. Same here. America is not perfect, yet we are fighting against an enemy that is, in compariosn, evil.
 
CCR said:
What exactly was the nature of the investment?
I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you and then be killed myself by my friend.

What exactly it was is irrelevant. What my point is is that illegal activities are widespread even during this "civilized" war that we are engaged in. Trying to deny or justify it is just plain stupid.
 
Leeds, the heart of Yorkshire.
Your grannie's a Brummie?
Bwahaha!
She lives in Sutton Coldfield, which is halfway to Lichfield, where I spent most of my time. Lichfield is, IMHO, one of the greatest towns in Europe, and I can say from expiriance that it's better then the parts of Leeds I saw.

You pretty much have. Really all the powers that be have to do is say "Uh...He's a terrorist!" and they can do what they like.
Reminds me of another period of US history.
No. The case would be thrown out as there is no reason to belive he is a terrorist. The people who drafted The Patriot Act are'nt stupid or evil, they don't want to get rid of Miranda.

Not in one document no. I think we're well enough protected if the gov't goes nasty (besides which, our government does not have the level of power over us that yours does). And your "cult of constitution" really is what you have. Worship of a 200+ year old document is daft. Much of it still applies, but other bits (*cough*gun ownership*cough*) don't apply as they did when it was drafted.
Yep. But I'd argue that America has a stronger Democratic tradition then GB, and the Cult of the Constitution is, typically, fairly effective at fighting totalitarianism at home.
 
Ozrat said:
CCR said:
What exactly was the nature of the investment?
I'd tell you, but then I'd have to kill you and then be killed myself by my friend.

What exactly it was is irrelevant. What my point is is that illegal activities are widespread even during this "civilized" war that we are engaged in. Trying to deny or justify it is just plain stupid.
I'm not going to deny it, but America HAS spent alot of money trying to not kill people it should'nt, despite some proporganda (the weddin "bombing" was actually a myth, at least the second).
 
ConstinpatedCraprunner said:
[She lives in Sutton Coldfield, which is halfway to Lichfield, where I spent most of my time. Lichfield is, IMHO, one of the greatest towns in Europe, and I can say from expiriance that it's better then the parts of Leeds I saw.
Never been there, nor do I really know anything about it. Leeds has some pretty crappy areas, hardly ghettoes but not much better, it also has some nicer ones. Like any town i s'pose.
No. The case would be thrown out as there is no reason to belive he is a terrorist. The people who drafted The Patriot Act are'nt stupid or evil, they don't want to get rid of Miranda.
It would be thrown out of court, but wasn't part of the patriot act that they could hold you, without any charges or evidence, for as long as they wanted?
I don't think the people who drafted it really care one way or the other about your rights, just about getting their man/men/whatever.
 
The American Army is, oddly enough, the most humane fighting force I can think of.....ever.

iraqis_tortured_wp-e.jpg



Maybe this doesn't count as being in the war though, and maybe this:

1atta0119.jpg


doesn't either, so I'll just include this too:

treem.jpg



Ever arrested? Ever learn what habeus corpus is? Have that in Europe, do you?

brutality.jpg


thomasjones.jpg



Habeus corpus? Most of these cops don't speak latin, methinks.


My point is that one should expect everything, and not be convinced of anything. Blindness is dangerous. You never know when you can fall down a hole.


Meh. I'm off to play America's army.
 
Big_T_UK wrote:
I'd say that we Brits have it better (particularly after the patriot act
Did you ever hear of the Official Secrets Act passed by parliament?

Big_T_UK Wrote:
Worship of a 200+ year old document is daft.

I suppose we should say the same thing about the English 'worship' of the Magna Carta.

Or the French worship of the 'Code Du Napoleon'


As parts of those are no longer relevant, but still used. To criticize the US Constitution and claim European countries do not do the same thing is ludicrous.

Ozrat wrote:
What exactly it was is irrelevant. What my point is is that illegal activities are widespread even during this "civilized" war that we are engaged in.

There you are quite wrong, without proof it is still an unfounded assertion. Just another rumor till proven. Or have you given up on the innocent till proven guilty part ?

Cheers Thorgrimm
 
An idiot in Australia has been sentenced to 25 years in prison for associating with dangerous terrorists. This sort of extreme and unjust reaction is indicative of the paranoia that governments around the world are caught up in. Fear of terrorism is almost reaching the level of the Cold War 'Red Scare'.

Although it can be useful to have documents such as a constitution, they are unneccesary as long as people know what is right (especially the judiciary). The Magna Carta is not 'worshipped', as the US Constitution is, because such things are not as relevent to some people today due to cultural and historical differences. To each, their own.
 
quietfanatic wrote:
Fear of terrorism is almost reaching the level of the Cold War 'Red Scare'.

I certainly agree with you on that part, as i also have my strong disapproval of the 'patriot act' and the committee for state security, otherwise known as the homeland defense dept. But to claim that the reverence Americans have for the document that our government is based on is no longer relevant is just an illustration of not really knowing what it states. I disagree strongly with a lot of things that the current administration is doing, but that does not invalidate the document that it is based on.


Cheers Thorgrimm
 
Thorgrimm said:
But to claim that the reverence Americans have for the document that our government is based on is no longer relevant is just an illustration of not really knowing what it states.

I mean't such things are not relevant to some people, while they are very important to others.

The Magna Carta is not 'worshipped', as the US Constitution is, because such things are not as relevent to some people today due to cultural and historical differences. To each, their own.


An example of another reason why it can sometimes seem to be pointless for people of diametrically opposed views to debate. However it is beneficial because it promotes shared understanding and reinforces one's belief.
 
quietfanatic wrote:
An example of another reason why it can sometimes seem to be pointless for people of diametrically opposed views to debate.

Since i revere all governmental documents from all nations that guarantee the rights of it's citizens, does that mean by your statement above that you do not like documents that guarantee the rights of it's citizens? Please enlighten me.


Cheers Thorgrimm
 
ThorGrimm said:
There you are quite wrong, without proof it is still an unfounded assertion. Just another rumor till proven. Or have you given up on the innocent till proven guilty part ?
Actually, I saw what this investment was with my own two shocked eyes, and I was told in great detail by this person exactly why its not legal so that I wouldn't be giving any details away.

But thanks for questioning my integrity.
 
ConstinpatedCraprunner said:
Patriot act is temporary, again.

This interests me. Is this "temporary" defined in more concrete terms? "Temporarily" (literally, "dočasně") is, after all, how Soviet troops were stationed in Czechoslovakia after 1968, and in the end it took a revolution to get them out.
 
Back
Top