To be honest welsh, I think this is probably being blown a little out of proportion. Saying that a few incidents (carried out by a few individuals) proves there is a climate of mistrust seems like something of an exaggeration to me. Yes, it can't have been good for muslim/non-muslim relations, but it's not like there is a religious war going on. Also, from what I've heard, most of the "retaliation" attacks were carried out by teenage boys, which makes it an even worse gauge for public opinion - teenage boys are far more likely to be hotheaded andd narrowminded. Not to mention easily led by one with stronger convictions.
I'm still in dubio about this. I see a lot of remarks along the way of "Islam sucks", but I haven't talked to many people thinking that, and I've talked to even fewer people with actually radical ideas about this. But that may be the spheres where I'm involved in.
A few facts stand out, though:
Wilders has outbid the VVD (the liberals) here, Wilders is the most extreme right-winger around with a very critical attitude of the Islam (he does say he isn't anti-Islam, but anti-extremism, though). The VVD is also critical of the Islam, but less so than Wilders, and has more than a century of history behind it, yet is falling short of Wilders. A lot, even.
The letters sent to Metro (free newspaper) give an indication that a lot of people seem to think that Islam has to go, can't be a part of Western society etc. Sounds that are critical of that view are diminishing.
There are more examples and events that have happened that have only worsened, not improved, the relationships between Islam and others. I think that Europe is becoming a battleground against Islam, the problem is whether that battle is justified. I think I'll have to read the Qu'Ran now. Hrmph.
EDIT: Interesting NPR article, but nothing new. *shrugs*