Wasteland 2 new screenshot

Talking about Polish, what is most popular dish of Poland?
Just curious because I haven't ate or heard about east Europe Cuisines.

anyway. complain about graphics are too familiar to me.
I guess I heard that kind of complain from fo3 fanboys when they trying Fo 1,2

and seriously, know game's quality only by graphic?
good graphic=good game, bad graphic= poor game?
well then, this game would be great
http://www.gameinformer.com/games/r...-rome-is-as-fun-as-dialing-phone-numbers.aspx
doesn't it?

think about Arcanum or TOEE. both games' graphics are not that good compare to other games at that time.
but as a game, it's one of the masterpiece.
grahics doesn't matter that much.

and WL2's graphics doesn't look so terrible.
it's doesn't look bother too much to play.
 
I have no idea what are you talking about! Did anyone suggest anything about the quality of the game as a whole?!

So many backers seem to overcompensate, this thread is not about new features or gameplay elements or writing, just new screenshots... is it so far fetched that people will discuss what they see?!

Here take your new Ranger badge:
[spoiler:39285bb359]
amsk5f.jpg
[/spoiler:39285bb359]
 
Personally I think it needs to look a little better.

I usually lurk rather than post, but one thing I notice is this argument on graphics always comes up. The fact is if the game can look better then it's a better game.

Not saying that all effort should be put into looks at the expense of the rest of the game, but it wouldn't hurt to put a bit of effort into the visuals that add atmosphere to the game.
 
Surf Solar said:
Are you serious? :lol:

He is talking about the amount of finetuning, looking into details, putting rough stuff together. "polishing". You may want to consult a vocabulary?

lol no, I wasn't serious.

But "polish" in every use is the absolute last thing that happens to a product, be it a diamond or an automobile, so until the game is finished, it's rather unfair to call it lacking polish. If it's still ugly at full release then it's a problem.
 
4rekl said:
Personally I think it needs to look a little better.

I usually lurk rather than post, but one thing I notice is this argument on graphics always comes up. The fact is if the game can look better then it's a better game.

Not saying that all effort should be put into looks at the expense of the rest of the game, but it wouldn't hurt to put a bit of effort into the visuals that add atmosphere to the game.

Yeah. I there's a difference between deprioritizing graphics and neglecting them.

No one wanted Wasteland 2 to spend its money becoming some graphical showcase -- but that's not to say that aesthetics aren't important.

I had a girl tell me one time that the first thing she noticed about a guy in terms of judging his attractiveness was his shoes. They didn't have to be expensive shoes, or even clean new shoes -- they just had to fit. old chuck taylors are fine if that's your style.

Someone mentioned arcanum earlier, which, i thought had an aesthetic style that worked (for what it was). Same with Baldurs gate and fo and any number of older games.

There's just something about this game that is just borderline without style. Not that I'll dislike the game, I might even love it. But its look is just something that right now doesn't work for me aesthetically. It's like it's wearing white tube socks, dress shoes, and shorts.
 
fred2 said:
I have no idea what are you talking about! Did anyone suggest anything about the quality of the game as a whole?!
maybe I was too sleepy to confunsed other community's articles with this. :oops:
 
Back
Top