Diarmada said:Kharn, did you listen to the January 31st edition, it had some stuff on F3 as well, a few points (around the 37 minute mark)....
That would've been more useful then
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0160/d016006d99c3716eafe0e86f03d1b9acf89e6cd2" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
Bernard said:Kharn, they seem to see not only youself as being representitive of the community, but also as the community of being representative of you. They haven't understood the context of the article, or really who you are and how you represent yourself, and in so doing they've simply resorted to lazy stereotyping. In the process, they've managed to attribute the opinions of the naysayers to yourself, whereas it seem fairly obvious to me that - especially under the circustances you discussed in Glittering Gems... you've been pretty decent and even-handed in dealing with hype and rumour (they won't have seen your various pleas for caution with respect to rumour, for instance).
They do slip up there, like this: "We don't know *anything* about Bethesda and what they're doing for Fallout 3 yet, we don't know squat. And yet they are completely obsessed and they have this delusion that the fanbase of Fallout, and they talk amongst each other and have their own community (...)"
What he *WANTS* to say here is "We don't know nothing, but yet they're bashing it", but there's not a hint in the article and few on the frontpage that there's some kind of massive bashing-without-knowing going on.
Skynet said:They read the article yes, yet they didn't understand it.
Oh, I don't know, that might be a bit harsh. They cover it very superficially, so it's hard to gauge how well they got it.
But believe me, I've seen a lot worse response, people simply not bothering to read it or understand it and instead taking the excuse to flame us.
Skynet said:If accepting values that I find repulsive and discarding my experience to "embrace" the new Fallout is what they want, they can suck on my Panamanian dick.
I don't think anyone of us will. NMA certainly won't. If it sucks, we'll always have a good job of modding out the suck.
Smoke_Jaguar said:Kharn, I agree with you that any publicity is good, but I've never heard of these Gamers with Jobs
I have. They're not one of the biggest sites out there, but they're consistent, often critical, are careful about falling for hype. Generally, they're a shite lot better than Gamespy.