Dr Fallout
Centurion
Australian mate, we have a lot of kangaroos, even in the outskirts of cities. It's actually pretty cool when you see a Kangaroo in the hills, though they run away often as not.
Why 3 was better than 4
- Thread starter Throatpunch
- Start date
Sn1p3r187
Carolinian Shaolin Monk
I have a question. Does the Australian military use the kangaroos for battle? Like put explosives in their pouch and they come hopping at some Taliban fighters and they explode?
Dr Fallout
Centurion
Yeah, we also ride to school on kangaroos. Also, we use drop bears instead of bombs. A lot more dangerous.
Slayerite
Hates (virtually) Everyone on the site.
Fallout 4 is better than 3. That's all.
Ben Soto
Professional Salt Shaker
Time to summon the shitstorm!
Fallout 4, from the few hours I've played, was, if nothing else, fun. The shooting is fun. The settlement building is fun. There are fun quests. It's not a good RPG, and I probably wouldn't rate it any higher than a 7, if that, but it's fun. Dumb fun, but after playing masterpieces like NV and Stanley Parable, I enjoy turning my brain off for a little bit and just having some fun.
Falllout 3 isn't even that. The shooting is absolutely terrible. There is exactly one quest I enjoyed (the Wasteland Survival Guide, mostly because Moira is really the only character I can stand) and there is nothing else to hold my interest.
It has no redeeming qualities. 4 has an interesting(-looking) world to explore. 3 is endless swathes of green, grey and brown.
Every year, I try and play 3 again, and every year, I remember why I hate it. It is the worst game I ever played.
Fallout 4, from the few hours I've played, was, if nothing else, fun. The shooting is fun. The settlement building is fun. There are fun quests. It's not a good RPG, and I probably wouldn't rate it any higher than a 7, if that, but it's fun. Dumb fun, but after playing masterpieces like NV and Stanley Parable, I enjoy turning my brain off for a little bit and just having some fun.
Falllout 3 isn't even that. The shooting is absolutely terrible. There is exactly one quest I enjoyed (the Wasteland Survival Guide, mostly because Moira is really the only character I can stand) and there is nothing else to hold my interest.
It has no redeeming qualities. 4 has an interesting(-looking) world to explore. 3 is endless swathes of green, grey and brown.
Every year, I try and play 3 again, and every year, I remember why I hate it. It is the worst game I ever played.
0wing
Все умрут, а я волномут
Time to close it by argumentum ad hominem: You don't play much of first person shooters or games with advanced crafting systems like some of these terrible japanese 'rpgs' or factorio or even just far cry 2/3/4, do you?
Ben Soto
Professional Salt Shaker
Never played Factorio, I have played Far Cry 1 and 3, neither of which I particularly like, and the last JRPG I played was the original Final Fantasy (more specifically, the GBA remake.) I play a metric ass-ton of FPSes (in the past two and a half months, I've played Serious Sam: TSE, Stalker: Call of Pripyat, Doom II, Delta Force, BioShock and the aforementioned few hours of F4 [I believe it was around level 5] and I'm currently running through Half-Life 1 again.)
Dr Fallout
Centurion
Far Cry 3 and 4 is fun. After that, Fallout 4 pales in comparison.
DerGogan
It Wandered In From the Wastes
Not really.
Dr Fallout
Centurion
Agreed, Fallout 3 had a modicum of choice.
Big No
Watch as I open and close this door
The only real thing 4 has over 3 is that 4 looks prettier, not much else.
0wing
Все умрут, а я волномут
And concenquences. Sometimes even reasonable.
Dr Fallout
Centurion
Apart from that strict talking down by your father for nuking a town.