TheWesDude said:
you do take a performance hit going from XP to W7, but W7 offers a lot supposedly.
i havent heard anything about how customizeable the installations are for W7, anyone want to comment? i heard that if you went with bare bones install you could get under 100 meg install sizes.
If I recall correctly (it's been a while since I installed it), there isn't really much you can choose in the actual installation, it's as lacking in choice as every version of Windows since after 98SE or so.
I think some guy on the vLite forums managed to use vLite on his Win7 disc to make a Win7 installation which used around 128 MBs of RAM, but I think it still used a whole bunch of HDD space. It was also extremely barebone with a lot of functionality removed, installed on an old PentiumIII laptop with 256 MBs of RAM. I wouldn't recommend that kind of trimming for any fairly new computer, at least not until vLite is updated with real support for Win7.
My laptop's installation (which I'm writing this from) takes up somewhere around 11 GBs of HDD space and uses ~650 MBs of RAM with Spotify, 2 Firefox tabs and Avira Antivirus (free version). This is with a non-vLited installation, though I've shut a number of services down, based on the recommendations from the
Black Viper website and my personal needs.
I would have run XP on my laptop if it hadn't been for the fact that installing graphics drivers gives a completely black screen around login time, making it pretty useless for games and stuff.
Win7 works pretty well for the most part once a lot of the useless graphical fluff has been deactivated. I (as some kind of semi-minimalist) personally find it bad taste to have large borders and shadows and semi-transparent parts of the windows that waste screen space without adding any practical benefit (if anyone knows some way in which this whole Aero debacle is beneficial from a practical point of view, please correct me).
Win7 has some new functionality compared to XP, but also lacks some things XP had, and in my opinion it's more of a pain to configure/maintain. Still, a bit better (and faster) than Vista in some ways (possibly a bit worse in some other ways, too), and it has pretty good driver support for all the hardware I've seen it being used on.