POLL: Trump or Hillary

TRUMP OR HILLARY FOR US PRESIDENT 2016?

  • Donald Trump

    Votes: 30 34.5%
  • Hillary Clinton

    Votes: 10 11.5%
  • Just shoot me already

    Votes: 47 54.0%

  • Total voters
    87
  • Poll closed .
They still have enough genetic similarity between them to be consider the same race.
Ok, lets give a different example.

Say hypothetically a white french person moved to England, and had children there. Would those children be English?
 
Then the Child is French
But you see, that's where your views start to fall apart.

Earlier, I gave the example of Brittany and Paris. You said that they have enough genetic similarities to be considered the same race.

However, people from Brittany are mostly descended from the Celts, whereas people from mainland France are mostly descended from Germanic Tribes(Mainly the Franks)

This means that people in Brittany are far more genetically similar to Welsh or Scottish people than they are to other French people.

This also means that people from mainland France have more similarities to people from England than they do to people from Brittany.

So by your logic, people from two different regions of France, can't both count as French.
 
But you see, that's where your views start to fall apart.

Earlier, I gave the example of Brittany and Paris. You said that they have enough genetic similarities to be considered the same race.

However, people from Brittany are mostly descended from the Celts, whereas people from mainland France are mostly descended from Germanic Tribes(Mainly the Franks)

This means that people in Brittany are far more genetically similar to Welsh or Scottish people than they are to other French people.

This also means that people from mainland France have more similarities to people from England than they do to people from Brittany.

So by your logic, people from two different regions of France, can't both count as French.
A lot of the French also descended from the Celts who used to occupy that area (and more) in pre-Roman times. You do have to keep in mind that a lot of mixing of the different European races went on and it is due to the fact that European races are so similar to eachother that theres not as much of a conflict when they mix.

Gonna be honest I think we're all kinda stepping out of our depth here at this point. I was merely stating that there are different genetic traits between certain peoples even among different European peoples and that you can't reasonably call someone who doesn't even share any of their traits a member of that people.
 
A lot of the French also descended from the Celts who used to occupy that area (and more) in pre-Roman times. You do have to keep in mind that a lot of mixing of the different European races went on and it is due to the fact that European races are so similar to eachother that theres not as much of a conflict when they mix.
The point still stands that there are more genetic differences between Britons and Parisians than Parisians and English

So which one counts as being French?
 
The point still stands that there are more genetic differences between Britons and Parisians than Parisians and English
Not really since you're basing it on their Celtic ancestry which Parisians also have as Celts were also present in that area.
 
Not really since you're basing it on their Celtic ancestry which Parisians also have as Celts were also present in that area.
But there were also Celts in most of Britain as well, that doesn't mean that modern day English people are descended as much from Celts as the Welsh were.
 
*great points*
*strange counter argument*
*even better point*
* much strange counter argument*

sisyphus1008ww.jpg

Yes, I do the same.
 
But there were also Celts in most of Britain as well, that doesn't mean that modern day English people are descended as much from Celts as the Welsh were.
But by that logic then that doesn't mean that Brittany is any more, less or the same amount of being descended from the Celts than the Welsh/English

This conversation is really going nowhere tbh as like I said we're both getting way off topic of this already off topic debate
*no argument at all*
And then there was a poor shmuck named Crni Vuk who had no arguments and provided nothing worthwhile to the thread and tried to substitute snark for intelligence.
 
Oh dear, its the day before it's decided who wins and who loses. It's the decision of trash vs garbage......................................yay (shoot me already pls).
 
Wonder how a thread on Trump somehow got lumped in with nationalistic viewpoints? Who am I kidding? Didn't read.
 
Seems like it often gets mixed up with racism. Why does it always involve being afraid of people not like you, or thinking you are better than them? Why does it often trigger war like the first World War? Maybe because it makes people feel like they are special fucking cornflakes when they are just as awful as every other piece of shit on the planet? Not sure really, but I consider myself a patriot and I wouldn't be caught dead saying we need to separate the races to preserve our heritage, or whatever nonsense is currently being spouted.
 
You make it sound as if Nationalism is bad.


Because it is bad.


EDIT: This fucking thread. Gotta hand it to you, Vergil. You beat Illuminati Confirmed. That guy was an idiot, fair and square, but some of the stuff you posted at several points here and there made me think you weren't the type. Damn, was I wrong, man.
You really are the type of the person who will go through 10,000 various entries which contradict your worldview and when you find that single one that affirms it, you will hold on to it. Admiring the persistence right there, but that's about the only thing that's positive about you.
And that tinfoil hat is looking sharp.
 
Last edited:
EDIT: This fucking thread. Gotta hand it to you, Vergil. You beat Illuminati Confirmed. That guy was an idiot, fair and square, but some of the stuff you posted at several points here and there made me think you weren't the type. Damn, was I wrong, man.
You really are the type of the person who will go through 10,000 various entries which contradict your worldview and when you find that single one that affirms it, you will hold on to it. Admiring the persistence right there, but that's about the only thing that's positive about you.
And that tinfoil hat is looking sharp.
Except not a single person gave any sort of scientific evidence to contradict what I was saying.
But by all means just call me an idiot and don't form any arguments, I'm sure that's the best way to get people to change their views on things and prove yours is correct. I may disagree with @JO'Geran but at least his responses had a little more substance than "wow i cant even believe you right now you're just so wrong ugh"
That being said I just feel absolutely BTFO by your epic takedown right now and am not sure how I'll ever recover.
Now, do you have any refutations to what I said or would you like to keep pretending I care what you of all people think of me in a derailed thread on an internet forum for a dying game series?
 
Back
Top