Search results

I will post my work in a little bit-- sorry, I haven't had much time lately.

I was just kidding. I'm a big fan of DLC, provided it's not crappy stuff like Horse Armor.

Remember the days where games stood on their own merit and didn't need expansion packs?

Well, people were upset about Fallout 3 DLC's too.

I think that $10 for a DLC is a little bit of a ripoff, but I also think that if it's entertaining and if buying it supports the possibility for Obsidian to work on future Fallouts I'm probably not going to quibble over 5 or 6 extra bucks.

Well, he must have some connection to the game (or is really good at guessing) because he revealed that the ghoul was featured on posters a while earlier.

It must be, unless he's talking about the dialog "around" or about the character, not actually her lines.

Have you ever watched Red Dwarf? I'm pretty sure that Cat Jules is based on the character on the show who was descended from an actual cat. This "cat" ancestor is why he acts like... well... a cat.

DAMMIT DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND THAT THIS COMMUNITY LOVES TO HATE THINGS?

Oh man, could anyone who has listened to the podcast quickly summarize anything important? Any news on what the "aesthetic" version of the ghoul is?

One of the dudes (the one who talks about how much he hated the person playing him) says "check out the muscles on this character model I've got. It's so exaggerated, it's ridiculous!" I think that it fits with the style of the game, though.

He is right, though, that the hero models are unrealistic. Don't they even complain about it in the Cafe of Broken Dreams? :wink:

Maybe he is the man from the Ultra-Luxe billboards... :P

Really? I guess that you must know what you're talking about, but it's called a "tech demo" in the files section and guide, both on NMA. I'm personally taking more issue with this: I don't think that anyone would mind much if it was as buggy as Gamebryo, as long as it kept the Fallout...

NetHack is the one I've played the most. First released in 1987. :smug:

Hm, that seems like the most interesting thing. More aesthetic-- does that mean that he was not a ghoul when we first saw him?

Even interpreting "ain't" and the double negative as being used ironically, it's still "nada"/10 Oh yeah, keep 'em coming! :mrgreen:

Pixote, do you have one of those?

Oh, I see. Thanks for the clarification!

How did that happen? And how could it prevent you from getting publicly available documents?