C2B said:I don't ... really see the similiarites.
C2B said:@Alec
...
What's the relevance?
C2B said:Wh.... What? How does THIS look like 1950 style? Hell, this looks more overproportionated muscles than the All Roads style.
What ?C2B said:Good let's call me ignorant. Saves everything.![]()
Take Watchmen for example, the art is not stellar awesome or anything, but it works perfectly with the writing. The art is tailored to fit the writing like a well-cut suit a qentleman - nothing is lost; often the opposite is the case. Haven't read it in a while now, but I remember it being excellent.Expresate said:In my opinion the story matters more than the pictures.
I have to admit that for a while I actually thought that it was a cover for a real comic book and Fallout had been a comic before being made into that awesome game. But I was 10 at the time and do not feel embarrassed any moreFallout 1 loading screen "comic cover"was indeed great.
sweetwarsaw said:Well, at least Samuel L. Jackson is in it.
![]()
Comic artists often use models when drawing. It's not Bethesda's doing that the characters may look like a famous person. That's just the comic industry, not that they have celebrities modeling for them.Gaspard said:Beth is all for celebrities it seems, heh - or the artist just sucks beyond balls
alec said:+- 60 pages doesn't make a graphic novel. Maybe it would be better to call it what it is: a comic. And not a very good one at that either. It's mainstream stuff, inked the way Marvel used to ink during the nineties. The style is not reminiscent of classic Fallout at all. Big fail in that department. But yeah, I guess those things don't matter anymore nowadays, do they? As long as there's a lot of sand and rocks and badass looking people, it's Fallout, eh?
Ausir said:The whole thing being illustrated by Darrow would be pretty kick-ass, though.