TheWesDude
Sonny, I Watched the Vault Bein' Built!

here is my problem... how are C&D orders NOT proof of one of the following when beth did not hold ownership of the products in the trilogy pack
it seems to me that it could be proof of A or B whichever applies
2. Should Bethesda pay Interplay’s costs for responding to the preliminary injunction? (decided)?
No.
To get a costs order Interplay needed to show that Bethesda pursued a preliminary injunction to enforce its trademark rights because of:
(a) Malice/fraud;
(b) economic coercion;
(c) pursued groundless arguments; or
(d) failed to cite controlling law.
Her Honour found that Interplay had failed to establish any of the above.
it seems to me that it could be proof of A or B whichever applies