Brother None said:I'll keep the total costs under my hat, but reveal that we have roughly 120-150 EUR to go to cover the costs for both me and SuA.
And now there's about 30 left. That was fast
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0160/d016006d99c3716eafe0e86f03d1b9acf89e6cd2" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
Brother None said:I'll keep the total costs under my hat, but reveal that we have roughly 120-150 EUR to go to cover the costs for both me and SuA.
Brother None said:Brother None said:I'll keep the total costs under my hat, but reveal that we have roughly 120-150 EUR to go to cover the costs for both me and SuA.
And now there's about 30 left. That was fast![]()
mattpeckham said:Yes I can. All we failed to do was mention we were reporting for NMA. Our press credentials were legit, our appointments were legit, made under our real names and for/by legitimate gaming sites. There is nothing in this whole thing that happened that was illegitimate or against the rules of GC or Bethesda. Hence "by the book."
Right, but look BN, let's stop dancing around the core issue. I know its 2007 and go postmodernism and everyone's decided they get to apply their own personal interpretation of what "is" is, but in reality, by your own admission, you purposefully excluded your NMA creds because you knew you wouldn't get in. I don't care, I'm not passing judgment, I'm just observing a behavior that, in aggregate, makes my job that much harder. Boohoo, I know, but true any way you shake it.
If Bethesda chooses to react heavily and childishly to this preview, which was not gained by illicit means and kind of forced by their own behaviour, why should NMA get the blame? Why, exactly, is Bethesda being allowed to shove around the media like that?
Forced by their own behavior? What, because Bethesda was up front about wanting to have a press only demo sans fansites, NMA's supposed to come off as heroic for sneaking in?