Vice City was amazing at the time, made the stuff that made GTA III great, even better, but I really like GTA IV.
Brother None said:Lexx said:It all starts pretty good but sooner or later there comes the point in the game, where I need to replay every mission 2, 3, 4 times until I get it done
So, uh, your complaint is that some missions are challenging?
Dopemine Cleric said:It's funny that the choice of VC pissed off everyone else, and made me happy that your not one of the fuddy-duddy ass-hats kharn.
Lexx said:In fact, yes. But it's not the "challenging" what is the real problem. The real problem is, that you need to redo it endless often, because you need to learn the missions.
I'm hoping you're not thinking this because Vice City got so high on the list - it's a great game.Ausdoerrt said:I really hope BN decides to troll everyone and puts Fallout 3 as his #1 on the list Could write a long review about innuvashun and immershun and all
I'd like to see what he'd say for all three of these.Brother None said:No, Dragon Age. RPG of the Decade.Reconite said:Fallout 3 will be number 1, just you wait...Phil the Nuka-Cola Dude said:I'm calling Oblivion in the top 5.
you already gave them all yourself. haven't got much to add to it, really.Brother None said:I'm trying but I can't find an actual argument in there.SuAside said:GTA? VC? better than the previous games? wtf you on, Kharn?
lolwatSuAside said:hamfisted relatively braindead console-y game vs storydriven deep games.
that's why it says "relatively" instead of just "braindead".Reconite said:lolwatSuAside said:hamfisted relatively braindead console-y game vs storydriven deep games.
GTA games rely a lot on the storyline and missions... and actually require thinking. They are not "relatively braindead", play GTA IV, it has the deepest story overall in a GTA game.
Calling it braindead at all is incorrect, it's not Halo 3/Fallout 3 where they spell it all out for you.SuAside said:that's why it says "relatively" instead of just "braindead".
-_- Did I say that? Of-fucking-course not.SuAside said:or are you going to claim VC's missions are as complicated as Arcanum's with just as many ways to resolve them?
It was more of a suggestion of which GTA game you should play if you're looking for story, because it looks to me you're judging GTA based solely on how it looks.SuAside said:it being the "deepest story overall in a GTA games" doesn't really say much in a series where setting hare krishnas (sp?) on fire is one of the more memorable objectives...
Reconite said:I'd like to see what he'd say for all three of these.
SuAside said:i'd be hard for me to believe if you said you played VC more than the Troika games, tbfh. now, that's entirely up to you obviously.
Black said:I tried playing VC. I got to the mission with the helicopter-toy and that was it for me.
AskWazzup said:Since you already listed a GTA game so high (had lots of fun with, but can't see any "TOP10 quality material" in it), a logical continuation to this list should include Mafia! Because everyone knows that Mafia>GTA
SuAside said:it being the "deepest story overall in a GTA games" doesn't really say much in a series where setting hare krishnas (sp?) on fire is one of the more memorable objectives...
Brother None said:Not...really...I guess you just suck?
Lexx said:Also I just wrote about VC and not about SA or IV.
In GTA IV when you die you keep your weapons (as said above), in GTA SA if you have the right girlfriends in the game they will keep your weapons for you if you die or get busted, in GTA VCS you can buy your weapons back from the police after dying or getting busted.Lexx said:Well, then I put the next point on the list: If you die, you loose your weapons and I hate this too.
Try running into people and divebombing them.samothethief said:The most appealing thing to me in IV was the new Ragdoll engine. Man, the first two days I kept ramming people with different type of cars